Removing eye-movement artifacts from the EEG during the intracarotid amobarbital procedure

被引:27
|
作者
Zhou, WD
Gotman, J
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Montreal Neurol Inst, Montreal, PQ H3A 2B4, Canada
[2] Shandong Univ, Coll Informat Sci & Eng n, Jinan 250100, Peoples R China
关键词
intracarotid amobarbital procedure (IAP); independent component analysis (ICA); correlation; artifacts; EEG;
D O I
10.1111/j.0013-9580.2005.50704.x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: The EEG is often recorded during the intracarotid amobarbital procedure (IAP) to help in the assessment of the spatial extent and the duration of the effect of the drug. In scalp recordings, the EEG is always heavily contaminated with eye movement artifacts as the patient actively performs visual tasks. Methods: Independent component analysis (ICA) is a new technique for blind source separation. In this study, we separated the EEG data recorded during the IAP into independent components using ICA. The EEG signal was reconstructed by excluding the components related to eye movement and eye blinks. Results: EEGs from 10 IAP tests were analyzed. The experimental results indicate that ICA is very efficient at subtracting eye-movement artifacts, while retaining the EEG slow waves and making their interpretation easier. Conclusions: ICA appears to be a generally applicable and effective method for removing ocular artifacts from EEG recordings during IAP, although slow waves and ocular artifacts share similar frequency distributions.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 414
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EEG SLOW WAVES AND MEMORY PERFORMANCE DURING THE INTRACAROTID AMOBARBITAL TEST
    JONESGOTMAN, M
    BOUWER, MS
    GOTMAN, J
    EPILEPSIA, 1994, 35 (01) : 61 - 69
  • [22] Removing "Cleaned" Eye-blinking Artifacts from EEG Measurements
    Heute, Ulrich
    Guzman, Alina Santillan
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL PROCESSING AND INTEGRATED NETWORKS (SPIN), 2014, : 576 - 580
  • [23] Application of envelope trend to analyze early EEG changes in the frontal regions during intracarotid amobarbital procedure in children
    Akman, Cigdem I.
    Micic, Vesna
    Quach, Michael
    Wilfong, Angus A.
    Schultz, Rebecca
    Riviello, James J., Jr.
    Chapieski, Mary L.
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2015, 43 : 66 - 73
  • [24] Effect of focus lateralization on memory assessment during the intracarotid amobarbital procedure
    Rouleau, I
    Robidoux, J
    Labrecque, R
    Denault, C
    BRAIN AND COGNITION, 1997, 33 (02) : 224 - 241
  • [25] QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS OF THE EEG IN THE INTRACAROTID AMOBARBITAL PROCEDURE .1. AMPLITUDE ANALYSIS
    AHERN, GL
    LABINER, DM
    HUTZLER, R
    OSBURN, C
    TALWAR, D
    HERRING, AM
    TACKENBERG, JN
    WEINAND, ME
    OOMMEN, KJ
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 91 (01): : 21 - 32
  • [26] The contribution of posterior circulation to memory function during the intracarotid amobarbital procedure
    M. Zijlmans
    C. J. A. Huibers
    G. J. Huiskamp
    G. A. P. de Kort
    W. C. J. Alpherts
    F. S. S. Leijten
    J. Hendrikse
    Journal of Neurology, 2012, 259 : 1632 - 1638
  • [27] Memory assessment during the intracarotid amobarbital procedure - Influence of injection order
    Bengner, T
    Haettig, H
    Merschhemke, M
    Dehnicke, C
    Meencke, HJ
    NEUROLOGY, 2003, 61 (11) : 1582 - 1587
  • [28] The contribution of posterior circulation to memory function during the intracarotid amobarbital procedure
    Zijlmans, M.
    Huibers, C. J. A.
    Huiskamp, G. J.
    de Kort, G. A. P.
    Alpherts, W. C. J.
    Leijten, F. S. S.
    Hendrikse, J.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2012, 259 (08) : 1632 - 1638
  • [29] GENERALIZED IMPLEMENTATION OF AN EYE-MOVEMENT CORRECTION PROCEDURE
    MILLER, GA
    GRATTON, G
    YEE, CM
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1988, 25 (02) : 241 - 243
  • [30] Lateralization of memory for music: Evidence from the intracarotid sodium amobarbital procedure
    Plenger, PM
    Breier, JI
    Wheless, JW
    Ridley, TD
    Papanicolaou, AC
    Brookshire, B
    Thomas, A
    Curtis, V
    Willmore, LJ
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1996, 34 (10) : 1015 - 1018