An identity and reputation approach to understanding the Dark Triad in the workplace

被引:10
|
作者
McLarty, Benjamin D. [1 ]
Whitman, Daniel S. [2 ]
Kluemper, Donald H. [3 ]
Tao, Siyi [3 ]
机构
[1] Mississippi State Univ, Coll Business, Dept Management & Informat Syst, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Rucks Dept Management, Baton Rouge, LA USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Dept Managerial Studies, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
Machiavellianism; narcissism; organizational citizenship behavior; personality; psychopathy; socioanalytic theory; JOB-PERFORMANCE; WORK BEHAVIOR; INTERPERSONAL PERCEPTION; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; 5-FACTOR MODEL; SELF-REPORTS; BRIGHT-SIDE; PERSONALITY; MACHIAVELLIANISM; TRAITS;
D O I
10.1002/job.2569
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Previous research examining the Dark Triad (DT) of personality (i.e., Machiavellianism, narcissism and psychopathy) in the workplace has theorized and assessed the DT almost exclusively from a "self" view perspective (e.g., self-ratings). In this paper, we extend what is known about dark personality by drawing from socioanalytic theory to make the case that the identity (i.e., "self" view) and reputation (i.e., "other" view) elements of the DT are distinct and complimentary concepts that must be examined in concert. Specifically, we hypothesize and demonstrate that understanding the interaction of identity-based DT and reputation-based DT enhances our ability to predict supervisor-rated organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). Utilizing response surface techniques to test our hypotheses, we demonstrate that significant differences exist between different combinations of identity- and reputation-based assessments of the DT and their relationship with OCB. More specifically, we find that supervisor-rated citizenship decreases at an accelerating rate when both self-views and coworker-views of the DT are considered. As such, accounting for DT identity and reputation simultaneously provides a more comprehensive understanding of how the DT relates to OCB. Therefore, we show that reputation-based aspects of the DT, in concert with identity-based DT, enhance our knowledge about how dark personality impacts OCB.
引用
收藏
页码:524 / 545
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Test of Two Brief Measures of the Dark Triad: The Dirty Dozen and Short Dark Triad
    Maples, Jessica L.
    Lamkin, Joanna
    Miller, Joshua D.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2014, 26 (01) : 326 - 331
  • [42] Workplace bullies, not their victims, score high on the Dark Triad and Extraversion, and low on Agreeableness and Honesty-Humility
    Daderman, Anna M.
    Ragnestal-Impola, Carina
    HELIYON, 2019, 5 (10)
  • [43] Dark Triad Traits and Cyberbullying Perpetration: Addressing Current Limitations in Dark Triad Studies
    Tang, Karen T. Y.
    Mungall, Luke R.
    Blais, Julie
    Pruysers, Scott
    DEVIANT BEHAVIOR, 2025,
  • [44] Understanding Relationships Among the Dark Triad Personality Profile and Romantic Partners' Conflict Communication
    Horan, Sean M.
    Guinn, Trey D.
    Banghart, Scott
    COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2015, 63 (02) : 156 - 170
  • [45] Understanding Academic Dishonesty in University Settings: The Interplay of Dark Triad Traits and Moral Disengagement
    Kokkinos, Constantinos M.
    Antoniadou, Nafsika
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 185 (05): : 309 - 322
  • [46] Dark Entrepreneurship, the 'Dark Triad' and Its Potential 'Light Triad' Realization in 'Green Entrepreneurship'
    Cooke, Philip
    URBAN SCIENCE, 2020, 4 (04)
  • [47] Structure of Darkness: The Dark Triad, the ''Dark" Empathy and the ''Dark" Narcissism
    Gojkovic, Vesna
    Dostanic, Jelena
    Duric, Veljko
    PRIMENJENA PSIHOLOGIJA, 2022, 15 (02): : 237 - 268
  • [48] A systems approach to understanding how reputation contributes to competitive advantage
    Brønn C.
    Brønn P.S.
    Corporate Reputation Review, 2015, 18 (2) : 69 - 86
  • [49] Academic entitlement and the Dark Triad
    Young, Emma
    PSYCHOLOGIST, 2022, 35 : 25 - 26
  • [50] The Dark Triad and facets of personality
    Christopher Marcin Kowalski
    Philip A. Vernon
    Julie Aitken Schermer
    Current Psychology, 2021, 40 : 5547 - 5558