Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without surgery for patients with resectable esophageal cancer: An analysis of the National Cancer Data Base

被引:36
|
作者
Naik, Kushal B. [1 ]
Liu, Yuan [2 ]
Goodman, Michael [1 ]
Gillespie, Theresa W. [3 ]
Pickens, Allan [3 ]
Force, Seth D. [3 ]
Steuer, Conor E. [4 ]
Owonikoko, Taofeek K. [4 ]
Ramalingam, Suresh S. [4 ]
Higgins, Kristin [5 ]
Beitler, Jonathan J. [4 ,5 ]
Shin, Dong M. [4 ]
Willingham, Field F. [6 ]
El-Rayes, Bassel [4 ]
Landry, Jerome C. [5 ]
Fernandez, Felix G. [3 ]
Saba, Nabil F. [4 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Winship Canc Inst, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[3] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[4] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hematol & Med Oncol, Winship Canc Inst, Atlanta, GA USA
[5] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Atlanta, GA USA
[6] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Digest Dis, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
chemoradiotherapy; chemotherapy; databases; esophageal neoplasms; esophagectomy; mortality; propensity score; radiotherapy; survival analysis; therapeutics; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; DEFINITIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; CHEMORADIATION; ADENOCARCINOMA; CHEMOTHERAPY; MANAGEMENT; TRIALS; TRENDS; RISK;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.30763
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUNDPatients with resectable esophageal cancer (rEC) are managed with either concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (CRSx) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone (cCR). To the authors' knowledge, there is insufficient evidence comparing the overall survival of patients treated with these 2 options. METHODSThe National Cancer Data Base was queried for rEC cases diagnosed from 2003 through 2011. Patients with previous cancers, cervical rEC, clinical stage T1N0 disease, or metastasis were excluded. cCR was defined as radiotherapy administered within 30 days of chemotherapy. CRSx was defined as cCR followed by esophagectomy within 90 days. Overall survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier methods, propensity score matching, and extended Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTSOf the 11,122 eligible patients, 8091 (72.7%) received cCR and 3031 (27.3%) received CRSx. The odds of receiving CRSx were higher among patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage II disease (vs stage III), adenocarcinoma (vs squamous cell carcinoma), lesions of the lower one-third of the esophagus, private insurance, and those living >25 miles from the treating facility or in areas with a higher median income or a greater percentage of high school-educated residents. Patients aged >70 years, female patients, African-American patients, those with 2 comorbidities, or those treated at community programs were more likely to receive cCR. After propensity score matching, the median and 10-year survival rates were found to be significantly better with CRSx (32.5 months [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 29.6-34.8 months] and 23.8% months [95% CI, 20.0-27.9 months], respectively) compared with cCR (14.2 months [95% CI, 13.4-15.5 months] and 6.1% months [95% CI, 3.9-9.0 months], respectively). CONCLUSIONSData from the National Cancer Data Base support the inclusion of surgery after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced rEC. Cancer 2017;123:3476-85. (c) 2017 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:3476 / 3485
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Will definitive chemoradiotherapy be a new normal for patients with resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer?
    Takeuchi, Hiroya
    ESOPHAGUS, 2020, 17 (04) : 363 - 364
  • [22] Will definitive chemoradiotherapy be a new normal for patients with resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer?
    Hiroya Takeuchi
    Esophagus, 2020, 17 : 363 - 364
  • [23] Chemoradiotherapy With or Without Surgery for Esophageal Squamous Cancer According to Hospital Volume
    Oliveira Duarte, Mateus Bringel
    Pereira, Eduardo Baldon
    Lopes, Luiz Roberto
    Andreollo, Nelson Adami
    Campello Carvalheira, Jose Barreto
    JCO GLOBAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 6 : 828 - 836
  • [24] Variation in the Use of Chemoradiotherapy for Stage II and III Anal Cancer: Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base
    Geltzeiler, Cristina B.
    Tsikitis, Vassiliki L.
    Kim, Jong S.
    Thomas, Charles R., Jr.
    Herzig, Daniel O.
    Lu, Kim C.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (12) : 3934 - 3940
  • [25] Variation in the Use of Chemoradiotherapy for Stage II and III Anal Cancer: Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base
    Cristina B. Geltzeiler
    Vassiliki L. Tsikitis
    Jong S. Kim
    Charles R. Thomas
    Daniel O. Herzig
    Kim C. Lu
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2016, 23 : 3934 - 3940
  • [26] National Cancer Data Base report on esophageal carcinoma
    Daly, JM
    Karnell, LH
    Menck, HR
    CANCER, 1996, 78 (08) : 1820 - 1828
  • [27] Chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy plus surgery for esophageal cancer
    Vellayappan, Balamurugan A.
    Soon, Yu Yang
    Ku, Geoffrey Y.
    Leong, Cheng Nang
    Lu, Jiade J.
    Tey, Jeremy C. S.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, (08):
  • [28] Utilization of surgical treatment for local and locoregional esophageal cancer: Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base
    Taylor, Lauren J.
    Greenberg, Caprice C.
    Lidor, Anne O.
    Leverson, Glen E.
    Maloney, James D.
    Macke, Ryan A.
    CANCER, 2017, 123 (03) : 410 - 419
  • [29] Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Among Elderly Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A National Cancer Data Base Analysis
    Hullett, C. R.
    Brower, J. V.
    Rosenberg, S. A.
    Wojcieszynski, A. P.
    Bassetti, M.
    Ritter, M. A.
    Macke, R.
    Maloney, J.
    Harari, P. M.
    Baschnagel, A. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (02): : E163 - E163
  • [30] Primary lung cancer surgery after curative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer patients
    Shien, Kazuhiko
    Yamashita, Motohiro
    Okazaki, Mikio
    Suehisa, Hiroshi
    Sawada, Shigeki
    Miyoshi, Shinichiro
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2011, 12 (06) : 1002 - 1006