That ICS should be First Line Therapy for Asthma - Con

被引:2
|
作者
van Asperen, Peter Paul [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp Westmead, Sydney Childrens Hosp Network, Dept Resp Med, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Discipline Paediat & Child Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
asthma; child; leukotriene receptor antagonists; inhaled corticosteroids; treatment efficacy; drug safety; INHALED CORTICOSTEROIDS; PRESCHOOL-CHILDREN; CLINICAL-TRIALS; MONTELUKAST; DISORDERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.prrv.2011.05.008
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Asthma is a heterogeneous disease and it is therefore unrealistic to expect that inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) would be appropriate first line preventer therapy for all children with asthma. There is good theoretical and clinical trial evidence demonstrating that leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) are more effective than ICS for viral induced wheezing and equivalent to ICS for mild persistent asthma in children. LTRAS do not have the systemic adverse effects of ICS, are generally well tolerated and their once daily oral administration enhances adherence. LTRAs should therefore be first line preventer therapy for children with frequent intermittent or mild persistent asthma while ICS should be reserved as first line treatment for children with moderate to severe persistent asthma. Given the skew in paediatric asthma severity towards the milder end, this effectively means that LTRAs should be tried first in 2 of every 3 children with asthma requiring preventer treatment. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 252
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条