Performance Evaluation of NETCONF-Based Low Latency Cross-Connect for 5G C-RAN Architectures

被引:0
|
作者
Andrus, B. [1 ,2 ]
Autenrieth, A. [1 ]
Pachnicke, S. [3 ]
Zou, S. [1 ]
Olmos, J. J. V. [4 ]
Monroy, I. T. [5 ]
机构
[1] ADVA Opt Networking, Martinsried, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Photon Engn, Lyngby, Denmark
[3] Kiel Univ CAU, Kiel, Germany
[4] Mellanox Technol, Roskilde, Denmark
[5] Tech Univ Eindhoven, Dept Elect Engn, Eindhoven, Netherlands
来源
2018 20TH ANNIVERSARY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRANSPARENT OPTICAL NETWORKS (ICTON) | 2018年
关键词
low latency XC; C-RAN; NETCONF; 5G;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The development of 5G wireless technology is in progress looking to cope with the increasing demands for high capacity, low latency, and ubiquitous mobile access. Cloud/Centralized Radio Access Networks (C-RAN) has been proposed as a promising approach to address the 5G benchmarks. C-RAN is a rising mobile network architecture based on the centralization and pooling of baseband processing elements, with the scope of increasing resource utilization efficiency and air-interface performance gains with fast scaling multi-cell coordination. In this paper we focus on proposing and evaluating a flexible low-latency cross-connect (XC) switch that allows a dynamic scheduling of networking resources between baseband units (BBUs) and remote radio heads (RRHs) in C-RAN deployments. On the one hand, we develop a control plane mechanism for manipulating the XC configuration and state data based on a custom YANG model and Network Configuration (NTCONF) protocol. Using a standard open NETCONF interface, automation of heterogeneous C-RAN resource assignment can be facilitated for 5G architectures. Secondly, we evaluate the performance of our XC in relation to the C-RAN stringent requirements and show that the latency and jitter introduced have negligible influence compared to radio interface limits. The impact of switching delay on the performance of a live system has yet to be tested however, a measured average switching time of 252 ms could still disrupt the ongoing connections.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Task Scheduling Scheme Based on Cost Optimization in 5G/Hetnets C-RAN
    Chabbouh, Olfa
    Agoulmine, Nazim
    Ben Rejeb, Sonia
    Choukair, Zied
    WIRED/WIRELESS INTERNET COMMUNICATIONS, WWIC 2017, 2017, 10372 : 87 - 98
  • [22] Resource allocation scheme for 5G C-RAN: a Swarm Intelligence based approach
    Ari, Ado Adamou Abba
    Gueroui, Abdelhak
    Titouna, Chafiq
    Thiare, Ousmane
    Aliouat, Zibouda
    COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2019, 165
  • [23] Reinforcement Learning Based Resource Allocation for Network Slicing in 5G C-RAN
    Wang, Xiaofei
    Zhang, Tiankui
    2019 COMPUTING, COMMUNICATIONS AND IOT APPLICATIONS (COMCOMAP), 2019, : 106 - 111
  • [24] 5G基站C-RAN集中方案研究
    陶永胜
    陈大威
    广东通信技术, 2020, 40 (09) : 26 - 29
  • [25] Coverage and Fronthaul Requirements in Beyond 5G C-RAN Deployments
    Bernadas i Busquets, Noe
    Gelabert, Xavier
    Klaiqi, Bleron
    Ben Slimane, Slimane
    Sung, Ki Won
    2024 24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRANSPARENT OPTICAL NETWORKS, ICTON 2024, 2024,
  • [26] 面向5G C-RAN前传解决方案
    张海辉
    通讯世界, 2020, 27 (06) : 25 - 26
  • [27] Advantages of Co-Deployment of C-RAN and MEC in 5G
    Kanwal, Asma
    Khalid, Maeeda
    Ejaz, Isha
    Tasbeeha
    Rathore, Sheeza
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2021 INTERNATIONAL BHURBAN CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES (IBCAST), 2021, : 932 - 937
  • [28] From massive MIMO to C-RAN: the OpenAirinterface 5G testbed
    Kaltenberger, Florian
    Jiang, Xiwen
    Knopp, Raymond
    2017 FIFTY-FIRST ASILOMAR CONFERENCE ON SIGNALS, SYSTEMS, AND COMPUTERS, 2017, : 608 - 612
  • [29] 面向C-RAN的5G前传方案研究
    丁为民
    陈一伟
    胡远
    电信工程技术与标准化, 2019, 32 (07) : 56 - 58+64
  • [30] Evolution of Mobile Networks and C-RAN on the Road Beyond 5G
    Semov, Plamen
    Koleva, Pavlina
    Tonchev, Krasimir
    Poulkov, Vladimir
    Cooklev, Todor
    2020 43RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (TSP), 2020, : 392 - 398