Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty With a Pull-Through Insertion Device: Surgical Technique, Endothelial Cell Loss, and Early Clinical Results

被引:29
|
作者
Tan, Tien-En [1 ,2 ]
Devarajan, Kavya [2 ]
Seah, Xin-Yi [2 ]
Lin, Shu-Jun [2 ]
Peh, Gary Swee Lim [2 ]
Cajucom-Uy, Howard Yu [3 ]
Ang, Marcus [1 ,2 ]
Mehta, Jodhbir Singh [1 ,2 ]
Tan, Donald Tiang Hwee [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Natl Eye Ctr, 11 Third Hosp Ave, Singapore 168751, Singapore
[2] Singapore Eye Res Inst, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Singapore Eye Bank, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Camden Med Ctr, Eye & Retina Surg, Singapore, Singapore
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
DMEK; E-DMEK; EndoGlide; pull-through; endothelium-in; DMEK GRAFTS; QUANTIFICATION; COMPLICATIONS; INJECTOR; OUTCOMES; QUALITY; TISSUE;
D O I
10.1097/ICO.0000000000002268
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To describe a surgical technique for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) using a pull-through, endothelium-in insertion device, the DMEK EndoGlide. We evaluated the endothelial cell loss (ECL) associated with the EndoGlide-DMEK (E-DMEK) technique in both ex vivo and prospective clinical studies. Methods: The ex vivo study involved calcein acetoxymethyl staining and preparation of DMEK grafts, which were trifolded endothelium-in, loaded into the EndoGlide, pulled through, and unfolded in imaging dishes. Inverted fluorescent microscopy was performed, and ECL was quantified using trainable segmentation software. The prospective clinical series describes the outcomes of consecutive surgeries using the E-DMEK technique. Grafts were pulled through the EndoGlide with forceps and unfolded in the anterior chamber endothelium-down. Our main outcome measure was ECL in both studies. Results: In the ex vivo study with 9 human donor corneas, mean ECL was 15.2% +/- 5.4% (n = 9). In our clinical series of 69 eyes, leading indications for surgery were pseudophakic/aphakic bullous keratopathy (47.8%), previous failed grafts (23.2%), and Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (18.8%). Rebubbling and primary graft failure rates related to E-DMEK were 11.6% and 1.5%, respectively. Among eyes with at least 6 months of follow-up, mean preoperative endothelial cell density was 2772 (range 2457-3448) cells/mm(2), and postoperative endothelial cell density was 1830 (range 541-2545) cells/mm(2). Mean ECL was 33.6% (range 7.5-80.4; n = 32) at the 7.1 (range 6-11) months follow-up. Conclusions: The ex vivo and pilot clinical studies suggest that E-DMEK shows acceptable rates of ECL, with safe and promising early clinical outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:558 / 565
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Complex Eyes: Results With a Donor Insertion Device
    Khor, Wei-Boon
    Teo, Kelvin Y.
    Mehta, Jodhbir S.
    Tan, Donald T-H.
    CORNEA, 2013, 32 (08) : 1063 - 1068
  • [32] Endothelial Cell Loss After Needle-Push Insertion Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSEK)
    Casswell, Edward J.
    Bowes, Oliver
    Barsam, Allon
    Perry, Henry D.
    CORNEA, 2016, 35 (06) : E16 - E17
  • [33] Endothelial Cell Loss Due to Graft Injector Method in Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Dokey, Adrian
    Chamberlain, Winston
    Schallhorn, Julie Marie
    Tran, Khoa D.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2016, 57 (12)
  • [34] Clinical outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with a glaucoma drainage device
    Birbal, R. S.
    Dapena, I.
    Tong, C. M.
    Parker, J. S.
    Parker, J. S.
    Oellerich, S.
    Melles, G. R. J.
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2019, 97 : 7 - 7
  • [35] Clinical Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Eyes With a Glaucoma Drainage Device
    Birbal, Renuka S.
    Tong, C. Maya
    Dapena, Isabel
    Parker, John S.
    Parker, Jack S.
    Oellerich, Silke
    Melles, Gerrit R. J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 199 : 150 - 158
  • [36] Clinical Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Eyes With a Glaucoma Drainage Device
    Mansoori, Tarannum
    Srirampur, Arjun
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 208 : 439 - 440
  • [37] Outcomes and Early Complications Using an Endothelium-in Pull-Through Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Technique With Preloaded Versus Surgeon-Loaded Donor Tissue in Fuchs Patients
    Cho, Kyongjin
    Ali, Muhammad
    Heckenlaible, Nicolas J.
    Jabbour, Samir
    Jun, Albert S.
    Srikumaran, Divya
    CORNEA, 2024, 43 (05) : 591 - 597
  • [38] Microthin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Matsou, Artemis
    Pujari, Rathin
    Sarwar, Hammad
    Rana, Mrinal
    Myerscough, James
    Thomson, Susan M.
    Nandakumar, Girinath
    Zhang, Jufen
    Rajan, Madhavan S.
    CORNEA, 2021, 40 (09) : 1117 - 1125
  • [39] Evidence of Endothelial Cell Migration After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Jacobi, Christina
    Zhivov, Andrey
    Korbmacher, Judit
    Falke, Karen
    Guthoff, Rudolf
    Schloetzer-Schrehardt, Ursula
    Cursiefen, Claus
    Kruse, Friedrich E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 152 (04) : 537 - 542
  • [40] Peripheral Endothelial Cell Density in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts
    Lee, Brian A.
    Qureshi, Saima
    Lee, Sung
    Hou, Gene J.
    Bedard, Peter
    Hou, Joshua H.
    CORNEA, 2019, 38 (06) : 748 - 753