Radical Prostatectomy With and Without Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Pretreatment for High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer: A Comparative Propensity Score Matched Analysis

被引:13
|
作者
Narita, Shintaro [1 ,7 ]
Nara, Takcioshi [1 ]
Kanda, Sohei [1 ]
Numakura, Kazuyuki [1 ]
Saito, Mitsuru [1 ]
Inoue, Takamitsu [1 ,7 ]
Satoh, Shigeru [1 ]
Nanjo, Hiroshi [2 ]
Tsuchiya, Norihiko [3 ,7 ]
Mitsuzuka, Koji [4 ,7 ]
Koie, Takuya [5 ,7 ]
Kawamura, Sadafumi [6 ,7 ]
Ohyama, Chikara [5 ,7 ]
Tochigi, Tatsuo [6 ,7 ]
Arai, Yoichi [4 ,7 ]
Habuchi, Tomonori [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Akita Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita 0108543, Japan
[2] Akita Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Akita, Japan
[3] Yamagata Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Yamagata, Japan
[4] Tohoku Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
[5] Hirosaki Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan
[6] Miyagi Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, Natori, Miyagi, Japan
[7] MJUCSG, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Combined androgen blockade; Docetaxel; Estramustine phosphate; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Prostatectomy; ANDROGEN-DEPRIVATION THERAPY; DOSE ESTRAMUSTINE PHOSPHATE; RANDOMIZED PHASE-II; HORMONE-THERAPY; DOCETAXEL; PREDNISONE; SURVIVAL; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.clgc.2018.09.019
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We compared the outcomes in patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) with radical prostatectomy (RP) alone. The biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCR) rate in patients with a single high-risk factor was significantly lower in the NCHT group. NCHT before RP can reduce the risk of BCR in patients with a single high-risk factor. Background: To investigate the clinical outcomes in patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) treated with neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) before radical prostatectomy (RP). Patients and Methods: Our NCHT protocol involved complete androgen blockade followed by 6 cycles of docetaxel (30 mg/m 2 ) plus estramustine phosphate (560 mg). NCHT was provided to 60 patients with PCa before RP, and we compared the clinical and pathologic outcomes with those of 349 patients with high-risk PCa who underwent RP alone using propensity score matching. The data for those who underwent RP alone were obtained from the Michinoku Japan Urological Cancer Study Group database. Results: In the NCHT group, 10.0% experienced pathologic complete response, 3.3% had positive surgical margins, and 13.3% developed severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher) after RP. The median follow-up duration was 42.5 months, and the 5-year biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival was 60.1%. In multivariate analysis, pN+ was an independent prognostic factor for BCR (hazard ratio = 5.251, 95%CI 1.300-21.201; P = .020). In propensity score matching, the BCR rate in the NCHT group was significantly lower than that in the RP alone group (P = .021). In subgroup analyses, the BCR rate in patients with a single high-risk factor was significantly lower in the NCHT group than in the RP-alone group (P = .027). Conclusion: NCHT before RP can reduce the risk of BCR in patients with high-risk PCa, particularly if a single high-risk factor is present. However, the potential for perioperative complications should be considered. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E113 / +
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Overall survival of high-risk prostate cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy followed by radical prostatectomy at a single institution
    Fujita, Naoki
    Koie, Takuya
    Ohyama, Chikara
    Tanaka, Yoshimi
    Soma, Osamu
    Matsumoto, Teppei
    Yamamoto, Hayato
    Imai, Atsushi
    Tobisawa, Yuki
    Yoneyama, Tohru
    Hatakeyama, Shingo
    Hashimoto, Yasuhiro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 22 (06) : 1087 - 1093
  • [32] Biochemical Outcome after Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer
    Roder, M.
    Berg, K.
    Christensen, I
    Gruschy, L.
    Brasso, K.
    Iversen, P.
    UROLOGY, 2012, 80 (03) : S32 - S32
  • [33] Radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer
    Ofer Yossepowitch
    James A. Eastham
    World Journal of Urology, 2008, 26 : 219 - 224
  • [34] Radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer
    Yossepowitch, Ofer
    Eastham, James A.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 26 (03) : 219 - 224
  • [35] Radical Prostatectomy for High-risk Prostate Cancer
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Hatano, Tadashi
    Blute, Michael L.
    Myers, Robert P.
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 40 (01) : 3 - 9
  • [36] Radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer
    Ischia, Joseph
    Gleave, Martin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 20 (03) : 290 - 300
  • [37] Salvage focal ablation versus radical prostatectomy for localized radiorecurrent prostate cancer: A propensity-score matched comparison
    Light, A.
    Calleris, G.
    Gontero, P.
    Ahmed, H. U.
    Marra, G.
    Shah, T. T.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S1407 - S1408
  • [38] Predictive factors associated with differential pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy in high-risk localized prostate cancer
    Fan, Junjie
    Liang, Hua
    Gu, Yanan
    Jiang, Zhangdong
    Jiang, Fan
    Wang, Yingchun
    He, Dalin
    Wu, Kaijie
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2023, 41 (08) : 354e1 - 354e9
  • [39] Neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy combined with radical prostatectomy and extended PLND for very high risk locally advanced prostate cancer: A retrospective comparative study
    Pan, Jiahua
    Chi, Chenfei
    Qian, Hongyang
    Zhu, Yinjie
    Shao, Xiaoguang
    Sha, Jianjun
    Xu, Fan
    Wang, Yanqing
    Karnes, Robert J.
    Dong, Baijun
    Xue, Wei
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2019, 37 (12) : 991 - 998
  • [40] Matched-paired analysis of radical radiotherapy vs. prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer
    Cambeiro, M.
    Diez-Caballero, F.
    Gimeno Morales, M.
    Basterra, M.
    Aristu Mendioroz, J.
    Moreno-Jimenez, M.
    Arbea, L.
    Martinez-Monge, R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S129 - S129