Outcomes of Digital Biomarker-Based Interventions: Protocol for a Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews

被引:8
|
作者
Motahari-Nezhad, Hossein [1 ]
Pentek, Marta [2 ]
Gulacsi, Laszlo [2 ,3 ]
Zrubka, Zsombor [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Corvinus Univ Budapest, Doctoral Sch Business & Management, Budapest, Hungary
[2] Obuda Univ, Univ Res & Innovat Ctr, Hlth Econ Res Ctr, Becsi Ut 96-B, H-1034 Budapest, Hungary
[3] Corvinus Univ Budapest, Corvinus Inst Adv Studies, Budapest, Hungary
来源
JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS | 2021年 / 10卷 / 11期
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
digital biomarker; outcome; systematic review; meta-analysis; digital health; mobile health; Grading of Recommendations; Assessment; Development and Evaluation; AMSTAR-2; review; biomarkers; clinical outcome; interventions; wearables; portables; digestables; implants; IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR; FUNNEL-PLOT; PUBLICATION BIAS; GRADE; QUALITY; FILL; TRIM;
D O I
10.2196/28204
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Digital biomarkers are defined as objective, quantifiable, physiological, and behavioral data that are collected and measured using digital devices such as portables, wearables, implantables, or digestibles. For their widespread adoption in publicly financed health care systems, it is important to understand how their benefits translate into improved patient outcomes, which is essential for demonstrating their value. Objective: The paper presents the protocol for a systematic review that aims to assess the quality and strength of the evidence reported in systematic reviews regarding the impact of digital biomarkers on clinical outcomes compared to interventions without digital biomarkers. Methods: A comprehensive search for reviews from 2019 to 2020 will be conducted in PubMed and the Cochrane Library using keywords related to digital biomarkers and a filter for systematic reviews. Original full-text English publications of systematic reviews comparing clinical outcomes of interventions with and without digital biomarkers via meta-analysis will be included. The AMSTAR-2 tool will be used to assess the methodological quality of these reviews. To assess the quality of evidence, we will evaluate the systematic reviews using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. To detect the possible presence of reporting bias, we will determine whether a protocol was published prior to the start of the studies. A qualitative summary of the results by digital biomarker technology and outcomes will be provided. Results: This protocol was submitted before data collection. Search, screening, and data extraction will commence in December 2021 in accordance with the published protocol. Conclusions: Our study will provide a comprehensive summary of the highest level of evidence available on digital biomarker interventions, providing practical guidance for health care providers. Our results will help identify clinical areas in which the use of digital biomarkers has led to favorable clinical outcomes. In addition, our findings will highlight areas of evidence gaps where the clinical benefits of digital biomarkers have not yet been demonstrated.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Choice of primary outcomes in randomised trials and systematic reviews evaluating interventions for preterm birth prevention: a systematic review
    Meher, S.
    Alfirevic, Z.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 121 (10) : 1188 - 1194
  • [42] Effectiveness of interventions for dry eye: a protocol for an overview of systematic reviews
    McCann, Paul
    Kruoch, Zanna
    Qureshi, Riaz
    Li, Tianjing
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (06):
  • [43] Effects of digital health interventions on the psychological outcomes of perinatal women: umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
    Lau, Ying
    Chew, Han Shi Jocelyn
    Ang, Wei How Darryl
    Ang, Wen Wei
    Yeo, Chin Yi
    Lim, Grace Zhi Qi
    Wong, Sai Ho
    Lau, Siew Tiang
    Cheng, Ling Jie
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2024, 18 (02) : 229 - 254
  • [44] Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with periodontal disease and the effectiveness of interventions in decreasing this risk: Protocol for systematic overview of systematic reviews
    Vanterpool S.F.
    Tomsin K.
    Reyes L.
    Zimmermann L.J.
    Kramer B.W.
    Been J.V.
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 5 (1)
  • [45] Identification of outcomes reported for hospital antimicrobial stewardship interventions using a systematic review of reviews
    Yousuf, Shazia
    Rzewuska, Magdalena
    Duncan, Eilidh
    Ramsay, Craig
    [J]. JAC-ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE, 2022, 5 (01):
  • [46] A review of systematic reviews on pain interventions in hospitalized infants
    Yamada, Janet
    Stinson, Jennifer
    Lamba, Jasmine
    Dickson, Alison
    McGrath, Patrick J.
    Stevens, Bonnie
    [J]. PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 2008, 13 (05): : 413 - 420
  • [47] Systematic reviews of psychosocial interventions for autism: an umbrella review
    Seida, Jennifer Krebs
    Ospina, Maria B.
    Karkhaneh, Mohammad
    Hartling, Lisa
    Smith, Veronica
    Clark, Brenda
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2009, 51 (02): : 95 - 104
  • [48] PSYCHOLOGICAL INTERVENTIONS FOR RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF REVIEWS
    Prothero, L.
    Barley, E.
    Galloway, J.
    Georgopoulou, S.
    Sturt, J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2016, 23 : S70 - S70
  • [49] Systematic reviews of complex interventions: framing the review question
    Squires, Janet E.
    Valentine, Jeffrey C.
    Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 66 (11) : 1215 - 1222
  • [50] Interventions for loneliness in older adults: a systematic review of reviews
    Patil, Uday
    Braun, Kathryn L.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 12