Outcomes of Digital Biomarker-Based Interventions: Protocol for a Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews

被引:8
|
作者
Motahari-Nezhad, Hossein [1 ]
Pentek, Marta [2 ]
Gulacsi, Laszlo [2 ,3 ]
Zrubka, Zsombor [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Corvinus Univ Budapest, Doctoral Sch Business & Management, Budapest, Hungary
[2] Obuda Univ, Univ Res & Innovat Ctr, Hlth Econ Res Ctr, Becsi Ut 96-B, H-1034 Budapest, Hungary
[3] Corvinus Univ Budapest, Corvinus Inst Adv Studies, Budapest, Hungary
来源
JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS | 2021年 / 10卷 / 11期
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
digital biomarker; outcome; systematic review; meta-analysis; digital health; mobile health; Grading of Recommendations; Assessment; Development and Evaluation; AMSTAR-2; review; biomarkers; clinical outcome; interventions; wearables; portables; digestables; implants; IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR; FUNNEL-PLOT; PUBLICATION BIAS; GRADE; QUALITY; FILL; TRIM;
D O I
10.2196/28204
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Digital biomarkers are defined as objective, quantifiable, physiological, and behavioral data that are collected and measured using digital devices such as portables, wearables, implantables, or digestibles. For their widespread adoption in publicly financed health care systems, it is important to understand how their benefits translate into improved patient outcomes, which is essential for demonstrating their value. Objective: The paper presents the protocol for a systematic review that aims to assess the quality and strength of the evidence reported in systematic reviews regarding the impact of digital biomarkers on clinical outcomes compared to interventions without digital biomarkers. Methods: A comprehensive search for reviews from 2019 to 2020 will be conducted in PubMed and the Cochrane Library using keywords related to digital biomarkers and a filter for systematic reviews. Original full-text English publications of systematic reviews comparing clinical outcomes of interventions with and without digital biomarkers via meta-analysis will be included. The AMSTAR-2 tool will be used to assess the methodological quality of these reviews. To assess the quality of evidence, we will evaluate the systematic reviews using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. To detect the possible presence of reporting bias, we will determine whether a protocol was published prior to the start of the studies. A qualitative summary of the results by digital biomarker technology and outcomes will be provided. Results: This protocol was submitted before data collection. Search, screening, and data extraction will commence in December 2021 in accordance with the published protocol. Conclusions: Our study will provide a comprehensive summary of the highest level of evidence available on digital biomarker interventions, providing practical guidance for health care providers. Our results will help identify clinical areas in which the use of digital biomarkers has led to favorable clinical outcomes. In addition, our findings will highlight areas of evidence gaps where the clinical benefits of digital biomarkers have not yet been demonstrated.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Digital Biomarker-Based Interventions: Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
    Motahari-Nezhad, Hossein
    Al-Abdulkarim, Hana
    Fgaier, Meriem
    Abid, Mohamed Mahdi
    Pentek, Marta
    Gulacsi, Laszlo
    Zrubka, Zsombor
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (12)
  • [2] POPULATIONS, INTERVENTIONS, AND OUTCOMES IN DIGITAL BIOMARKER-BASED INTERVENTIONS' SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS: A SCOPING REVIEW
    Motahari-Nezhad, H.
    Fgaier, M.
    Pentek, M.
    Gulacsi, L.
    Zrubka, Z.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (07) : S534 - S534
  • [3] Digital Biomarker-Based Studies: Scoping Review of Systematic Reviews
    Motahari-Nezhad, Hossein
    Fgaier, Meriem
    Abid, Mohamed Mahdi
    Pentek, Marta
    Gulacsi, Laszlo
    Zrubka, Zsombor
    [J]. JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2022, 10 (10):
  • [4] Salutogenically focused outcomes in systematic reviews of intrapartum interventions: A systematic review of systematic reviews
    Smith, Valerie
    Daly, Deirdre
    Lundgren, Ingela
    Eri, Tine
    Benstoem, Carina
    Devane, Declan
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 2014, 30 (04) : E151 - E156
  • [5] Family-based interventions for substance misuse: A systematic review of systematic reviews-protocol
    Akram Y.
    Copello A.
    Moore D.
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 3 (1)
  • [6] Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: A protocol for a systematic review of methods, outcomes and effects
    Pollock A.
    Campbell P.
    Struthers C.
    Synnot A.
    Nunn J.
    Hill S.
    Goodare H.
    Watts C.
    Morley R.
    [J]. Research Involvement and Engagement, 3 (1)
  • [7] Health outcomes of Fitbit, Garmin or Apple Watch-based interventions: A systematic review of systematic reviews
    Motahari-nezhad, Hossein
    Zare, Fateme
    Akbari, Hadi
    Sadeghdaghighi, Aslan
    [J]. BALTIC JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2022, 14 (04)
  • [8] Selecting Review Outcomes for Systematic Reviews of Public Health Interventions
    Wolfenden, Luke
    Movsisyan, Ani
    McCrabb, Sam
    Stratil, Jan M.
    Yoong, Sze Lin
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 111 (03) : 465 - 470
  • [9] Interventions for Physician Burnout: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
    Kalani, Simin Dokht
    Azadfallah, Parviz
    Oreyzi, Hamidreza
    Adibi, Peyman
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 9
  • [10] The Impact of mHealth Interventions: Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
    Marcolino, Milena Soriano
    Queiroz Oliveira, Joao Antonio
    D'Agostino, Marcelo
    Ribeiro, Antonio Luiz
    Moreira Alkmim, Maria Beatriz
    Novillo-Ortiz, David
    [J]. JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2018, 6 (01):