Impact strength of cemented implant interfaces

被引:1
|
作者
Kocak, Sait [1 ]
Sekercioglu, Tezcan [2 ]
机构
[1] Pamukkale Univ, Mech Engn Dept, Denizli, Turkey
[2] Pamukkale Univ, Mechatron Engn Dept, Denizli, Turkey
关键词
Bone cement; cemented joint replacement; cement-bone interface; implant-cement interface; impact strength; ACRYLIC BONE-CEMENT; STAINLESS-STEEL INTERFACES; FEMORAL COMPONENTS; MANTLE THICKNESS; IN-VITRO; FAILURE; FRACTURE; SHEAR; MICROMECHANICS; STIFFNESS;
D O I
10.3139/120.111481
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
Bone cement is a polymer used as filler material for the attachment of bone to implants in cemented joint replacements. Stronger interdigitation of the bone cement with both the implant and the bone provides a more durable surgical intervention. In previous studies published in the literature to date, tensile, shear and multi-axial stress occurring on the interfaced surfaces of the cement due to static and dynamic loads acting on the femur have been tested. This study investigated the impact strength of both implant-cement and cement-bone interfaces in a cemented implant. The effects of different implant materials, blasting sand particle size and cement mantle thickness on impact strength were investigated. It was determined that the surface roughness values of the implant materials increased as larger blasting sand particles were applied. As the surface roughness increased, the interfacial impact strength also increased. The impact strength of the cement-bone interface was higher than that of the implant-cement interface. The optimum mantle thickness in terms of impact strength was found to be 2 mm. Under impact force, failure will occur at the implant-bone cement interface.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 276
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Shear Strength of Artificially Cemented Sands
    Lee, Moon-Joo
    Choi, Sung-Kun
    Lee, Woojin
    MARINE GEORESOURCES & GEOTECHNOLOGY, 2009, 27 (03) : 201 - 216
  • [32] Strength and failure of cemented granular matter
    Topin, V.
    Delenne, J.-Y.
    Radjaie, F.
    Brendel, L.
    Mabille, F.
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL E, 2007, 23 (04): : 413 - 429
  • [33] Adhesion and reliability of interfaces in cemented total joint arthroplasties
    Ohashi, KL
    Romero, AC
    McGowan, PD
    Maloney, WJ
    Dauskardt, RH
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1998, 16 (06) : 705 - 714
  • [34] Technique for removing a cemented superstructure from an implant abutment
    Okamoto, M
    Minagi, S
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2002, 87 (02): : 241 - 242
  • [35] STRENGTH OF POLYMER INTERFACES
    WOOL, RP
    WILLETT, JL
    MCGAREL, OJ
    YUAN, BL
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1987, 194 : 175 - POLY
  • [36] 'Explanting' the well-fixed, cemented acetabular implant
    Arshad, H.
    Chirodian, N.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2013, 95 (02) : 158 - 158
  • [37] Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments
    Dudley, J. E.
    Richards, L. C.
    Abbott, J. R.
    AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 2008, 53 (04) : 332 - 339
  • [38] Choosing your implant - Cemented, tricompartmental, and posterior stabilized
    Laskin, RS
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2005, 20 (04): : 7 - 9
  • [39] Reliability of retrievable cemented implant-supported prostheses
    Nissan, Joseph
    Snir, David
    Rosner, Ofir
    Kolerman, Roni
    Chaushu, Liat
    Chaushu, Gavriel
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2016, 115 (05): : 587 - 591
  • [40] DESIGN FOR ARTIFICIAL CROWN CEMENTED TO CUSTOM IMPLANT ABUTMENT
    MORGANO, SM
    HADDAD, MJ
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1994, 72 (03): : 344 - 345