History and Outlook for Glyphosate-Resistant Crops

被引:18
|
作者
Green, Jerry M. [1 ]
Siehl, Daniel L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Green Ways Consulting LLC, Landenberg, PA 19350 USA
[2] Corteva Agrisci, Wilmington, DE USA
来源
REVIEWS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, VOL 255: GLYPHOSATE | 2021年 / 255卷
关键词
Biotechnology; Formulation; Genetically modified crops; Herbicide-resistant; Herbicide-tolerant; Resistance; Tolerance; Traits; Weed; Weed management; AMINO-ACID SUBSTITUTION; 5-ENOLPYRUVYLSHIKIMATE-3-PHOSPHATE SYNTHASE; HERBICIDE RESISTANCE; MOLECULAR-BASIS; KLEBSIELLA-PNEUMONIAE; 3-PHOSPHATE SYNTHASE; CONFER RESISTANCE; STRUCTURAL BASIS; WEED MANAGEMENT; CURRENT STATE;
D O I
10.1007/398_2020_54
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops, commercially referred to as glyphosate-tolerant (GT), started the revolution in crop biotechnology in 1996. Growers rapidly accepted GR crops whenever they became available and made them the most rapidly adopted technology in agriculture history. Adoption usually meant sole reliance on glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine, CAS No. 1071-83-6] for weed control. Not surprisingly, weeds eventually evolved resistance and are forcing growers to change their weed management practices. Today, the widespread dissemination of GR weeds that are also resistant to other herbicide modes-of-action (MoA) has greatly reduced the value of the GR crop weed management systems. However, growers continue to use the technology widely in six major crops throughout North and South America. Integrated chemistry and seed providers seek to sustain glyphosate efficacy by promoting glyphosate combinations with other herbicides and stacking the traits necessary to enable the use of partner herbicides. These include glufosinate {4-[hydroxy(methyl)phosphinoyl]-DL-homoalanine, CAS No. 51276-47-2}, dicamba (3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acid, CAS No. 1918-00-9), 2,4-D [2-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid, CAS No. 94-75-7], 4-hydroxyphenyl pyruvate dioxygenase inhibitors, acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase (ACCase) inhibitors, and other herbicides. Unfortunately, herbicide companies have not commercialized a new MoA for over 30 years and have nearly exhausted the useful herbicide trait possibilities. Today, glyphosate-based crop systems are still mainstays of weed management, but they cannot keep up with the capacity of weeds to evolve resistance. Growers desperately need new technologies, but no technology with the impact of glyphosate and GR crops is on the horizon. Although the expansion of GR crop traits is possible into new geographic areas and crops such as wheat and sugarcane and could have high value, the Roundup Ready (R) revolution is over. Its future is at a nexus and dependent on a variety of issues.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 91
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Herbicide programs for control of glyphosate-resistant canola (Brassica napus) in glyphosate-resistant soybean
    Mierau, Allyson
    Kurtenbach, Moria E.
    Johnson, Eric N.
    Gulden, Robert H.
    Weber, Jessica D.
    May, William E.
    Willenborg, Christian J.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 34 (04) : 540 - 546
  • [32] Survey of glyphosate-resistant junglerice (Echinochloa colona) accessions in dicamba-resistant crops in Tennessee
    Perkins, Clay M.
    Mueller, Thomas C.
    Steckel, Lawrence E.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 35 (03) : 412 - 418
  • [33] Economic impact of glyphosate-resistant weeds on major field crops grown in Ontario
    Soltani, Nader
    Geddes, Charles
    Laforest, Martin
    Dille, J. Anita
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 36 (05) : 629 - 635
  • [34] Evolution of Glyphosate-Resistant Weeds
    Baek, Yousoon
    Bobadilla, Lucas K.
    Giacomini, Darci A.
    Montgomery, Jacob S.
    Murphy, Brent P.
    Tranel, Patrick J.
    REVIEWS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, VOL 255: GLYPHOSATE, 2021, 255 : 93 - 128
  • [35] Glyphosate-resistant soybean cultivar response to glyphosate
    Elmore, RW
    Roeth, FW
    Klein, RN
    Knezevic, SZ
    Martin, A
    Nelson, LA
    Shapiro, CA
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2001, 93 (02) : 404 - 407
  • [36] Glyphosate Effects on Plant Mineral Nutrition, Crop Rhizosphere Microbiota, and Plant Disease in Glyphosate-Resistant Crops
    Duke, Stephen O.
    Lydon, John
    Koskinen, William C.
    Moorman, Thomas B.
    Chaney, Rufus L.
    Hammerschmidt, Raymond
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2012, 60 (42) : 10375 - 10397
  • [37] Control of volunteer glyphosate-resistant corn (Zea mays) in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max)
    Deen, W
    Hamill, A
    Shropshire, C
    Soltani, N
    Sikkema, PH
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 20 (01) : 261 - 266
  • [38] An integrated approach to control glyphosate-resistant Ambrosia trifida with tillage and herbicides in glyphosate-resistant maize
    Ganie, Z. A.
    Lindquist, J. L.
    Jugulam, M.
    Kruger, G. R.
    Marx, D. B.
    Jhala, A. J.
    WEED RESEARCH, 2017, 57 (02) : 112 - 122
  • [39] Influence of glyphosate-resistant cropping systems on weed species shifts and glyphosate-resistant weed populations
    Johnson, William G.
    Davis, Vince M.
    Kruger, Greg R.
    Weller, Stephen C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2009, 31 (03) : 162 - 172
  • [40] Glyphosate-induced weed shifts in glyphosate-resistant corn or a rotation of glyphosate-resistant corn, sugarbeet, and spring wheat
    Wilson, Robert G.
    Miller, Stephen D.
    Westra, Philip
    Kniss, Andrew R.
    Stahlman, Phillip W.
    Wicks, Gall W.
    Kachman, Stephen D.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 21 (04) : 900 - 909