Development of a program theory for shared decision-making: a realist synthesis

被引:40
|
作者
Waldron, Tamara [1 ]
Carr, Tracey [1 ]
McMullen, Linda [2 ]
Westhorp, Gill [3 ]
Duncan, Vicky [1 ]
Neufeld, Shelley-May [1 ]
Bandura, Lori-Ann [1 ]
Groot, Gary [1 ]
机构
[1] Dept Community Hlth & Epidemiol, Hlth Sci Bldg,107 Wiggins Rd, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E5, Canada
[2] Univ Saskatchewan Arts, Dept Psychol, 154,9 Campus Dr, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A5, Canada
[3] Charles Darwin Univ, Ellengowan Dr, Casuarina, NT 0810, Australia
关键词
(3-10 words); shared decision making; Realist review; Mechanisms; Quality improvement; Health systems; Medical decision making; CANCER; CARE; MODEL; PARTICIPATION; FACILITATORS; PREFERENCES; INFORMATION; COMPETENCES; BARRIERS; ONCOLOGY;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-019-4649-1
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Shared Decision-making (SDM), a medical decision-making model, was popularized in the late 1980s in reaction to then predominate paternalistic decision-making, aiming to better meet the needs of patients. Extensive research has been conducted internationally examining the benefits of SDM implementation; however, existing theory on how SDM works, for whom, in which circumstances, and why is limited. While literature has shown positive patient, health care provider, and system benefits (SDM outputs), further research is required to understand the nuances of this type of decision-making. As such, we set out to address: "In which situations, how, why, and for whom does SDM between patients and health care providers contribute to improved engagement in the Shared Decision-making process?" Methods To achieve our study goals we conducted a seven-step realist synthesis process, which included: (1) preliminary program theory development, (2) search strategy development, (3) selection and appraisal of literature in accordance with realist methodology, (4) data extraction, (5) identification of relevant formal theories, (6) data analysis and synthesis, and (7) formation of a revised program theory with the input of stakeholders. This process was done in accordance with RAMESES guidelines and publication standards for a realist synthesis. Expert consultations were also held to ensure consistency within the SDM literature. Results Through our realist synthesis, we developed a program theory of SDM which includes three contexts (pre-existing relationship, difficulty of decision, and system support), eight mechanism sets (anxiety, trust, perception of other party capacity, perception of time, self-efficacy, world view, perception of capacity to external support, and recognition of decision), and one outcome (engagement in SDM). Conclusions As far as the authors of this paper are aware, this paper is the first to begin unpacking how SDM works, for whom, in which circumstances, and why. By examining key mechanism sets and exploring how they facilitate or inhibit SDM, we have produced a program theory that may assist health care professionals, policy makers, and patients. While further research is suggested to further unpack the concepts identified within this paper, this provides an initial understanding into the theory behind SDM. Registration PROSPERO: CRD42017062609.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Shared decision-making in question
    Charavel, M
    Bremond, A
    Moumjid-Ferdjaoui, N
    Mignotte, H
    Carrere, MO
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2001, 10 (02) : 93 - 102
  • [32] Shared Decision-Making in Pediatrics
    Sawyer, Kimberly E.
    Opel, Douglas J.
    PEDIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 71 (01) : 39 - 48
  • [33] Shared Decision-Making in Prosthodontics
    Sailer, Irena
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2020, 33 (06) : 597 - 598
  • [34] Shared decision-making in HCM
    Maron, Barry J.
    Nishimura, Rick A.
    Maron, Martin S.
    NATURE REVIEWS CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 14 (03) : 125 - 126
  • [35] Development and field testing of a consumer shared decision-making training program for adults with low literacy
    Muscat, Danielle M.
    Morony, Suzanne
    Shepherd, Heather L.
    Smith, Sian K.
    Dhillon, Haryana M.
    Trevena, Lyndal
    Hayen, Andrew
    Luxford, Karen
    Nutbeam, Don
    McCaffery, Kirsten
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2015, 98 (10) : 1180 - 1188
  • [36] Three to tango: Making the case for shared shared decision-making
    Sanatani, Michael
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2023, 112
  • [37] CYBERNETICS AND SOCIOLINGUISTICS IN DEVELOPMENT OF DECISION-MAKING THEORY
    CHEBAT, JC
    CYBERNETICA, 1977, 20 (04): : 313 - 321
  • [38] Impact of a shared decision-making program on patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia
    Piercy, GB
    Deber, R
    Trachtenberg, J
    Ramsey, EW
    Norman, RW
    Goldenberg, SL
    Nickel, JC
    Elhilali, M
    Perrault, JP
    Kraetschmer, N
    Sharpe, N
    UROLOGY, 1999, 53 (05) : 913 - 920
  • [39] Development of a shared decision-making tool in vitiligo: an international study
    Shourick, J.
    Ahmed, M.
    Seneschal, J.
    Passeron, T.
    Andreux, N.
    Qureshi, A.
    Chow, E. Y.
    Natella, P. A.
    Harris, J.
    Tran, V. -T.
    Ezzedine, K.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2021, 185 (04) : 787 - 796
  • [40] DEVELOPMENT OF AN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION SHARED DECISION-MAKING TOOL (AFSDM)
    Eckman, Mark H.
    Wise, Ruth E.
    Costea, Alexandru
    Attari, Mehran
    Munjal, Jitender
    Ireton, Robert
    Baker, Peter
    Knochelmann, Carol
    Flaherty, Matthew L.
    Leonard, Anthony C.
    Harnett, Brett M.
    Steen, Dylan
    Kues, John
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 32 : S744 - S744