Norm enforcement in social dilemmas: An experiment with police commissioners

被引:13
|
作者
Dickinson, David L. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Masclet, David [2 ,7 ]
Villeval, Marie Claire [3 ,4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Appalachian State Univ, Dept Econ, Boone, NC 28608 USA
[2] Univ Rennes, F-35000 Rennes, France
[3] Univ Lyon, F-69007 Lyon, France
[4] CNRS, GATE Lyon St Etienne, Ecully, France
[5] Chapman Univ, ESI, Orange, CA USA
[6] IZA, Bonn, Germany
[7] CIRANO, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Norm enforcement; Sanctions; Rewards; Voluntary contribution mechanism; Police; Experiment; PUBLIC-GOODS; COLD-PRICKLE; WARM-GLOW; PUNISHMENT; PROVISION; SANCTIONS; REWARDS; COOPERATION; MOTIVATION; REASONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.03.012
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Do individuals trained in law enforcement punish or reward differently from typical student-subjects? We analyze norm enforcement behavior of newly appointed police commissioners in both a game with positive externalities (based on a Voluntary Contribution Mechanism) and a similar game with negative externalities. Depending on the treatment, a reward or sanction institution is either exogenously or endogenously implemented. Police commissioners cooperate significantly more in both games and bear a higher burden of the sanction costs compared to non-police subjects. When the norm enforcement institution is endogenous, subjects favor rewards over sanctions, but police subjects are more likely to vote for sanctions. Police subjects also reward and sanction more than the others when the institution results from a majority vote. Our experiment suggests that lab evidence on social dilemma games with positive or negative externalities and enforcement institutions is rather robust. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 85
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条