Multi-stakeholder initiatives through the lens of labour regimes: Towards a heuristic analytical framework

被引:2
|
作者
Wickramasingha, Shyamain [1 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Business Sch, Dept Management Soc & Commun, Dalgas Have 15, DK-2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
关键词
Multi -stakeholder initiatives; Accord; Apparel Industry; Bangladesh; Governance; Labour; Labour regimes; GLOBAL PRODUCTION NETWORKS; SUPPLY CHAINS; DELIBERATIVE CAPACITY; PRIVATE REGULATION; GOVERNANCE; STANDARDS; CODES; POWER; POLITICS; CONDUCT;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.09.017
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
This paper develops the concept of labour regimes as an application to better understand multi-stakeholder initiatives that are established to govern labour in global production networks. The labour regimes approach connects both global production dynamics and territorialised economic, political, and social formations in understanding labour outcomes at the workplace. The labour regimes approach helps explicate the intersection of labour, capital, and the state, configured across time and space. I argue that such an analytical approach can reveal often contested, and sometimes obscured relations between stakeholders and how they shape the progress and the sustainability of multi-stakeholder initiatives. I make this case by taking the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in the Bangladeshi apparel industry as an empirical case example. This study takes a different approach from the existing works on the Accord. With the Accord having completed its tenure in 2019, this paper specifically focuses on the absence of two key national stakeholders - the state and manufactures from the Steering Committee of the Accord, and examines how this absence affected the Accord's ability to deliver its objectives. Based on qualitative research in and around the Dhaka garment cluster, the paper demonstrates that this absence of the state and manufacturers engendered paradoxical outcomes. While it helped the Accord successfully implement its building safety program in the short-term, the transition of the Accord at the end of its tenure, and thus its long-term sustainability was affected by the lack of commitment of the state and manufacturers to the Accord's mandate.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intraorganizational Bargaining in Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives
    Cutcher-Gershenfeld, Joel
    [J]. NEGOTIATION JOURNAL, 2015, 31 (04) : 393 - 400
  • [2] Towards Multi-Stakeholder Clouds
    Borysei, Bohdan
    Saroiu, Stefan
    de Lara, Eyal
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2024 THE 25TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON MOBILE COMPUTING SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS, HOTMOBILE 2024, 2024, : 47 - 52
  • [3] Input and Output Legitimacy of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives
    Mena, Sebastien
    Palazzo, Guido
    [J]. BUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY, 2012, 22 (03) : 527 - 556
  • [4] Ownership dynamics in local multi-stakeholder initiatives
    Biekart, Kees
    Fowler, Alan
    [J]. THIRD WORLD QUARTERLY, 2018, 39 (09) : 1692 - 1710
  • [5] Poster: Towards Multi-Stakeholder Clouds
    Borysei, Bohdan
    Saroiu, Stefan
    de Lara, Eyal
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2024 THE 25TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON MOBILE COMPUTING SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS, HOTMOBILE 2024, 2024, : 146 - 146
  • [6] Actor and Institutional Dynamics in the Development of Multi-stakeholder Initiatives
    Anica Zeyen
    Markus Beckmann
    Stella Wolters
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2016, 135 : 341 - 360
  • [7] Actor and Institutional Dynamics in the Development of Multi-stakeholder Initiatives
    Zeyen, Anica
    Beckmann, Markus
    Wolters, Stella
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2016, 135 (02) : 341 - 360
  • [8] Deliberation in Multi-Stakeholder Participation: A Heuristic Framework Applied to the Committee on World Food Security
    Zanella, Matheus Alves
    Goetz, Ariane
    Rist, Stephan
    Schmidt, Oscar
    Weigelt, Jes
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (02)
  • [9] Do multi-stakeholder initiatives make for better CSR?
    Tanimoto, Kanji
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2019, 19 (04): : 704 - 716