Subsurface imaging with low frequency SAR - Field validation in Egypt using a Ground-Penetrating Radar

被引:0
|
作者
Grandjean, G [1 ]
Paillou, P [1 ]
Baghdadi, N [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liege, Liege, Belgium
来源
REMOTE SENSING IN TRANSITION | 2004年
关键词
low frequency radar; penetration in soils; ground-penetrating radar; airborne SAR;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
We study the capabilities of low frequency radar systems to sound the subsurface in and countries. This approach is based on the coupling between two complementary radar techniques: the airborne Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) used in L-band (1.2 GHz) for imaging large scale subsurface structures, and the Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR) used between 500 and 900 MHz for sounding soils at a local scale, from the surface down to several meters. In this paper, we first recall the results obtained on the well-known site of Bir Safsaf (southern Egypt). The comparison between L-band SAR and GPR sections shows that penetration effects occur in many places, revealing rich subsurface structures. A numerical model is then proposed for quantitatively interpreting the SAR/GPR data. This model is based on electric field extrapolation in the frequency domain, taking into account the looking specificities of both the SAR and GPR systems. Simulated signals from given realistic geological cross sections can then be analyzed in order to understand the contribution of volume backscattering on both of radar systems. These results suggest that airborne radar systems in a lower frequency range (P-L band) should be able to detect soil structures down to several meters, leading to innovative Earth observation systems for geological and hydrogeological mapping in and regions.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 298
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ballast evaluation using ground-penetrating radar
    Gallagher, Gerard
    Leiper, Quentin
    Clark, Maxwell
    Forde, Michael
    Railway Gazette International, 2000, 156 (02) : 101 - 102
  • [32] Imaging the structure of cave ice by ground-penetrating radar
    Hausmann, H.
    Behm, M.
    CRYOSPHERE, 2011, 5 (02): : 329 - 340
  • [33] Application of ground-penetrating radar to the identification of subsurface piping in blanket peat
    Holden, J
    Burt, TP
    Vilas, M
    EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2002, 27 (03) : 235 - 249
  • [34] Validation of ALOS/PALSAR Subsurface Penetration Depth in Farafra Oasis as an Arid Region Based on Field Ground-Penetrating Radar Measurements
    Mansour, Khamis
    Zaher, Mohamed Abdel
    Al Deep, Mohamed
    Medhat, Noha
    Ebrahim, Shereen
    Mohamed, Abbas
    SENSING AND IMAGING, 2024, 25 (01):
  • [35] Evaluating use of ground-penetrating radar for identifying subsurface flow pathways
    Gish, TJ
    Dulaney, WP
    Kung, KJS
    Daughtry, CST
    Doolittle, JA
    Miller, PT
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2002, 66 (05) : 1620 - 1629
  • [36] Subsurface Propagation Velocity Estimation Methods in Ground-Penetrating Radar: A Review
    Panda, Swarna Laxmi
    Maiti, Subrata
    Sahoo, Upendra Kumar
    IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING MAGAZINE, 2022, 10 (04) : 70 - 89
  • [37] Ground-penetrating radar attribute analysis for visualization of subsurface archaeological structures
    Khwanmuang, Wisarat
    Udphuay, Suwimon
    Leading Edge, 2012, 31 (08): : 946 - 949
  • [38] Modeling of ground-penetrating radar for accurate characterization of subsurface electric properties
    Lambot, S
    Slob, EC
    van den Bosch, I
    Stockbroeckx, B
    Vanclooster, M
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2004, 42 (11): : 2555 - 2568
  • [39] Forward Simulation and Image Analysis of Ground-Penetrating Radar for Subsurface Pipes
    Ling Dai-jian
    Fu Shi-hu
    Yuan Jianli
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING II, PTS 1-4, 2013, 256-259 : 1212 - 1216
  • [40] Detection of subsurface permafrost features with ground-penetrating radar, Barrow, Alaska
    Hinkel, KM
    Doolittle, JA
    Bockheim, JG
    Nelson, FE
    Paetzold, R
    Kimble, JM
    Travis, R
    PERMAFROST AND PERIGLACIAL PROCESSES, 2001, 12 (02) : 179 - 190