Molecular Biomarkers in Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:48
|
作者
Sareen, Heena [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Yafeng [1 ,2 ]
Becker, Therese M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Roberts, Tara L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
de Souza, Paul [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Powter, Branka [1 ]
机构
[1] Ingham Inst Appl Med Res, Ctr Circulating Tumour Cell Diagnost & Res, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, South Western Clin Sch, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
[3] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Med, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, Australia
[4] Liverpool Hosp, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
关键词
glioblastoma; prognostic biomarkers; systematic review; meta-analysis; GROWTH-FACTOR RECEPTOR; MGMT PROMOTER METHYLATION; DEATH-LIGAND; PHASE-II; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA; MALIGNANT GLIOMA; TEMOZOLOMIDE; BEVACIZUMAB; EXPRESSION;
D O I
10.3390/ijms23168835
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive cancer with poor prognosis that needs better treatment modalities. Moreover, there is a lack of reliable biomarkers to predict the response and outcome of current or newly designed therapies. While several molecular markers have been proposed as potential biomarkers for GBM, their uptake into clinical settings is slow and impeded by marker heterogeneity. Detailed assessment of prognostic and predictive value for biomarkers in well-defined clinical trial settings, if available, is scattered throughout the literature. Here we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic and predictive significance of clinically relevant molecular biomarkers in GBM patients. Material and methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to retrieve publications from 3 databases (Pubmed, Cochrane and Embase) from January 2010 to December 2021, using specific terms. The combined hazard ratios (HR) and confidence intervals (95% CI) were used to evaluate the association of biomarkers with overall survival (OS) in GBM patients. Results: Twenty-six out of 1831 screened articles were included in this review. Nineteen articles were included in the meta-analyses, and 7 articles were quantitatively summarised. Fourteen studies with 1231 GBM patients showed a significant association of MGMT methylation with better OS with the pooled HR of 1.66 (95% CI 1.32-2.09, p < 0.0001, random effect). Five studies including 541 GBM patients analysed for the prognostic significance of IDH1 mutation showed significantly better OS in patients with IDH1 mutation with a pooled HR of 2.37 (95% CI 1.81-3.12; p < 0.00001]. Meta-analysis performed on 5 studies including 575 GBM patients presenting with either amplification or high expression of EGFR gene did not reveal any prognostic significance with a pooled HR of 1.31 (95% CI 0.96-1.79; p = 0.08). Conclusions: MGMT promoter methylation and IDH1 mutation are significantly associated with better OS in GBM patients. No significant associations were found between EGFR amplification or overexpression with OS.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Modifiable risk factors for glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Marcia Harumy Yoshikawa
    Nícollas Nunes Rabelo
    João Paulo Mota Telles
    Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo
    Neurosurgical Review, 46
  • [22] Modifiable risk factors for glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yoshikawa, Marcia Harumy
    Rabelo, Nicollas Nunes
    Telles, Joao Paulo Mota
    Figueiredo, Eberval Gadelha
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2023, 46 (01)
  • [23] Survival after hypofractionation in glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jane-Chloe Trone
    Alexis Vallard
    Sandrine Sotton
    Majed Ben Mrad
    Omar Jmour
    Nicolas Magné
    Benjamin Pommier
    Silvy Laporte
    Edouard Ollier
    Radiation Oncology, 15
  • [24] Active Immunotherapy for Glioblastoma Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wahyuhadi, Joni
    Haq, Irwan Barlian Immadoel
    Arifianto, Muhammad Reza
    Sulistyono, Bagus
    Meizikri, Rizki
    Rosada, Atika
    Prakoeswa, Cita Rosita Sigit
    Susilo, Rahadian Indarto
    CANCER CONTROL, 2022, 29
  • [25] Active Immunotherapy for Glioblastoma Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wahyuhadi, Joni
    Immadoel Haq, Irwan Barlian
    Arifianto, Muhammad Reza
    Sulistyono, Bagus
    Meizikri, Rizki
    Rosada, Atika
    Sigit Prakoeswa, Cita Rosita
    Susilo, Rahadian Indarto
    CANCER CONTROL, 2022, 29
  • [26] The role of lobectomy in glioblastoma management: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Arvaniti, Christina K.
    Karagianni, Maria D.
    Papageorgakopoulou, Manthia A.
    Brotis, Alexandros G.
    Tasiou, Anastasia
    Fountas, Kostas N.
    BRAIN AND SPINE, 2024, 4
  • [27] The impact of hyperglycemia on survival in glioblastoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lu, Victor M.
    Goyal, Anshit
    Vaughan, Lachlin S.
    McDonald, Kerrie L.
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 170 : 165 - 169
  • [28] Active Immunotherapy for Glioblastoma Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wahyuhadi, Joni
    Immadoel Haq, Irwan Barlian
    Arifianto, Muhammad Reza
    Sulistyono, Bagus
    Meizikri, Rizki
    Rosada, Atika
    Sigit Prakoeswa, Cita Rosita
    Susilo, Rahadian Indarto
    CANCER CONTROL, 2022, 29
  • [29] Cystic glioblastoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of characteristics and outcomes
    Sae-Huang, Morrakot
    Smith, Luke Christopher
    Usher, Inga
    Hill, Ciaran Scott
    BRAIN AND SPINE, 2022, 2
  • [30] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Biomarkers for Pediatric Pneumonia
    Gunaratnam, Lourdes Cynthia
    Robinson, Joan L.
    Hawkes, Michael T.
    JOURNAL OF THE PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASES SOCIETY, 2021, 10 (09) : 891 - 900