Molecular Biomarkers in Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:48
|
作者
Sareen, Heena [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Yafeng [1 ,2 ]
Becker, Therese M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Roberts, Tara L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
de Souza, Paul [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Powter, Branka [1 ]
机构
[1] Ingham Inst Appl Med Res, Ctr Circulating Tumour Cell Diagnost & Res, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, South Western Clin Sch, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
[3] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Med, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, Australia
[4] Liverpool Hosp, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
关键词
glioblastoma; prognostic biomarkers; systematic review; meta-analysis; GROWTH-FACTOR RECEPTOR; MGMT PROMOTER METHYLATION; DEATH-LIGAND; PHASE-II; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA; MALIGNANT GLIOMA; TEMOZOLOMIDE; BEVACIZUMAB; EXPRESSION;
D O I
10.3390/ijms23168835
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive cancer with poor prognosis that needs better treatment modalities. Moreover, there is a lack of reliable biomarkers to predict the response and outcome of current or newly designed therapies. While several molecular markers have been proposed as potential biomarkers for GBM, their uptake into clinical settings is slow and impeded by marker heterogeneity. Detailed assessment of prognostic and predictive value for biomarkers in well-defined clinical trial settings, if available, is scattered throughout the literature. Here we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic and predictive significance of clinically relevant molecular biomarkers in GBM patients. Material and methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to retrieve publications from 3 databases (Pubmed, Cochrane and Embase) from January 2010 to December 2021, using specific terms. The combined hazard ratios (HR) and confidence intervals (95% CI) were used to evaluate the association of biomarkers with overall survival (OS) in GBM patients. Results: Twenty-six out of 1831 screened articles were included in this review. Nineteen articles were included in the meta-analyses, and 7 articles were quantitatively summarised. Fourteen studies with 1231 GBM patients showed a significant association of MGMT methylation with better OS with the pooled HR of 1.66 (95% CI 1.32-2.09, p < 0.0001, random effect). Five studies including 541 GBM patients analysed for the prognostic significance of IDH1 mutation showed significantly better OS in patients with IDH1 mutation with a pooled HR of 2.37 (95% CI 1.81-3.12; p < 0.00001]. Meta-analysis performed on 5 studies including 575 GBM patients presenting with either amplification or high expression of EGFR gene did not reveal any prognostic significance with a pooled HR of 1.31 (95% CI 0.96-1.79; p = 0.08). Conclusions: MGMT promoter methylation and IDH1 mutation are significantly associated with better OS in GBM patients. No significant associations were found between EGFR amplification or overexpression with OS.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MOLECULAR BIOMARKERS IN PERIPARTUM CARDIOMYOPATHY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Cherubin, S.
    Peoples, T.
    Gillard, J.
    Lakhal-Littleton, S.
    Kurinczuk, J.
    Nair, M.
    JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2020, 74 : A25 - A25
  • [2] GLIOBLASTOMA TREATMENT RESPONSE MACHINE LEARNING MONITORING BIOMARKERS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Booth, T. C.
    Chelliah, A.
    Roman, A.
    Al Busaidi, A.
    Shuaib, H.
    Luis, A.
    Mirchandani, A.
    Alparslan, B.
    Mansoor, N.
    Ashkan, K.
    Ourselin, S.
    Modat, M.
    Grzeda, M.
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2021, 23 : 11 - 12
  • [3] lncRNAs as prognostic molecular biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zheng, Chuqian
    Liu, Xiuxia
    Chen, Leifeng
    Xu, Zheng
    Shao, Jianghua
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (35) : 59638 - 59647
  • [4] Dexamethasone in Patients with Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Scheffler, Pierre
    Fung, Christian
    Momjian, Shahan
    Koessinger, Dominik
    Haeni, Levin
    Neidert, Nicolas
    Straehle, Jakob
    Volz, Florian
    Schnell, Oliver
    Beck, Juergen
    El Rahal, Amir
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (07)
  • [5] Bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, T.
    Xin, Q.
    Kang, J-M
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 25 (21) : 6480 - 6491
  • [6] Molecular biomarkers for objective assessment of symptomatic pulpitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Karrar, Riham N.
    Cushley, Siobhan
    Duncan, Henry F.
    Lundy, Fionnuala T.
    Abushouk, Salma A.
    Clarke, Mike
    El-Karim, Ikhlas A.
    INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2023, 56 (10) : 1160 - 1177
  • [7] Biomarkers of neurodegeneration in schizophrenia: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wilson, Jack Christopher
    Liu, Kathy Y.
    Jones, Katherine
    Mahmood, Jansher
    Arya, Utkarsh
    Howard, Rob
    BMJ MENTAL HEALTH, 2024, 27 (01):
  • [8] Biomarkers in retinopathy of prematurity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Almutairi, Mariam
    Chechalk, Katherine
    Deane, Emelia
    Fox, Rebecca
    Janes, Ava
    Maguire-Henry, Tidgh
    McCabe, Devin
    O'Connor, Cole
    Quirk, Joseph
    Swan, Evan
    White, Katherine
    McCreery, Kathryn
    Isweisi, Eman
    Stewart, Philip
    Branagan, Aoife
    Roche, Edna F.
    Meehan, Judith
    Molloy, Eleanor J.
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2024, 12
  • [9] Biomarkers in psoriatic arthritis: A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Wirth, Theo
    Balandraud, Nathalie
    Boyer, Laurent
    Lafforgue, Pierre
    Pham, Thao
    FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [10] Biomarkers and Tourette syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jiang, Yanlin
    Li, Yuan
    Chen, Xi
    Zhai, Rui
    Peng, Yaqi
    Tai, Ran
    Zhou, Congxiao
    Wang, Junhong
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2024, 15