Review of the effects of dilution of dietary energy with olestra on energy intake

The non-absorbable substitute for dietary triacylglycerol, olestra, has been marketed in the United States for fifteen years. Olestra is comprised of sucrose with six to eight of its hydroxyl groups forming ester links with long-chain fatty acids. Because olestra is not hydrolyzed by fat-splitting enzymes in the small intestine, it is not absorbed from the small intestine into blood and tissues, and therefore provides no energy that can be utilized by the body. The hedonic properties of olestra with a specific fatty acid composition are similar to those of a triacylglycerol with the same fatty acid composition. Its use by consumers has been restricted by federal regulation to the commercial preparation of savory snack food items, principally as a frying medium for potato chips. An important question about the substitution of olestra for absorbable fat in the diet is whether the consumer will sense that a smaller amount of energy has been ingested. If it is sensed, thereby providing no satiation, then consuming additional energy in later meals will compensate for the removal of absorbable energy from the diet. If it is not sensed at all, then there is no compensation, and the person reduces caloric intake. This review first summarizes studies with olestra that have focused on its effect on the physiology of appetite. In general these studies have demonstrated that olestra does not influence signals of satiation including cholecystokinin and stomach emptying. The review then discusses studies of food consumption in experimental animals in which olestra was substituted for fat in the diet. Rodents have been repeatedly observed to compensate completely for the substitution of olestra for normal fat by eating more total diet Most studies of the effect of olestra on human satiation have found incomplete or no compensation through additional energy consumption when olestra was substituted for dietary fat. In two clinical studies, however, complete compensation was observed, suggesting that experimental conditions and individual variability influence the ability to sense the substitution of olestra for absorbable fat. There is no evidence that dietary olestra causes consumption of more energy than would have been consumed without olestra in the diet. The data from animals and humans strongly suggest that the rodent is not a satisfactory model for the human in the determination of the extent of compensation by substitution of olestra for dietary fat. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.