Neuromodulation Special Issue Evidence-based umbrella review of cognitive effects of prefrontal tDCS

被引:12
|
作者
Farhat, Luis C. [1 ]
Carvalho, Andre F. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Solmi, Marco [5 ,6 ]
Brunoni, Andre R. [1 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Psiquiatria, Fac Med FMUSP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Ctr Addict & Mental Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychiat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Deakin Univ, IMPACT Strateg Res Ctr Innovat Mental & Phys Hlth, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[5] Univ Padua, Padua Neurosci Ctr, Padua, Italy
[6] Univ Padua, Dept Neurosci, Padua, Italy
[7] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Psychiat, Lab Neurosci LIM 27, Fac Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[8] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Internal Med, Fac Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
umbrella review; non-invasive brain stimulation; cognition; psychology; psychiatry; reproducibility; DIRECT-CURRENT STIMULATION; NONINVASIVE BRAIN-STIMULATION; WORKING-MEMORY IMPROVEMENT; PSYCHIATRIC-DISORDERS; CURRENT THERAPY; FOOD CRAVINGS; METAANALYSIS; HEALTHY; DEPRESSION; SCHIZOPHRENIA;
D O I
10.1093/scan/nsaa084
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, which has been increasingly used as an investigational tool in neuroscience. In social and affective neuroscience research, the prefrontal cortex has been primarily targeted, since this brain region is critically involved in complex psychobiological processes subserving both 'hot' and 'cold' domains. Although several studies have suggested that prefrontal tDCS can enhance neuropsychological outcomes, meta-analyses have reported conflicting results. Therefore, we aimed to assess the available evidence by performing an umbrella review of meta-analyses. We evaluated the effects of prefrontal active vs sham tDCS on different domains of cognition among healthy and neuropsychiatric individuals. A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 was employed to evaluate the quality of meta-analyses, and the GRADE system was employed to grade the quality of evidence of every comparison from each meta-analysis. PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched, and 11 meta-analyses were included resulting in 55 comparisons. Only 16 comparisons reported significant effects favoring tDCS, but 13 of them had either very low or low quality of evidence. Of the remaining 39 comparisons which reported non-significant effects, 38 had either very low or low quality of evidence. Meta-analyses were rated as having critically low and low quality. Among several reasons to explain these findings, the lack of consensus and reproducibility in tDCS research is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 60
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Introduction to the Special Issue: Legislation Related to Children’s Evidence-Based Practice
    Eric Trupin
    Suzanne Kerns
    Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 2017, 44 : 1 - 5
  • [42] Special issue on evidence-based government: secure, transparent and responsible digital governance
    Chun, Soon Ae
    Adam, Nabil R.
    Noveck, Beth Simone
    INFORMATION POLITY, 2018, 23 (02) : 119 - 123
  • [43] Introduction to the Special Issue: Legislation Related to Children's Evidence-Based Practice
    Trupin, Eric
    Kerns, Suzanne
    ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2017, 44 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [44] Evidence-Based Tailoring of Treatment to Patients, Providers, and Processes: Introduction to the Special Issue
    Zilcha-Mano, Sigal
    Constantino, Michael J.
    Eubanks, Catherine F.
    JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 90 (01) : 1 - 4
  • [45] The Second Annual Musculoskeletal Biologics Special Issue Highlights Evidence-Based Therapies
    Lubowitz, James H.
    Matzkin, Elizabeth
    Rossi, Michael J.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2024, 40 (05):
  • [46] An Evidence-Based Review of Cognitive Rehabilitation in Medical Conditions Affecting Cognitive Function
    Langenbahn, Donna M.
    Ashman, Teresa
    Cantor, Joshua
    Trott, Charlotte
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2013, 94 (02): : 271 - 286
  • [47] An Evidence-Based Systematic Review on Cognitive Interventions for Individuals With Dementia
    Hopper, Tammy
    Bourgeois, Michelle
    Pimentel, Jane
    Qualls, Constance Dean
    Hickey, Ellen
    Frymark, Tobi
    Schooling, Tracy
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2013, 22 (01) : 126 - 145
  • [48] Evidence-based actions within the multilevel system of schools - Requirements, processes, and effects (EviS) Special Issue Editorial
    Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, Olga
    JOURNAL FOR EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ONLINE-JERO, 2016, 8 (03): : 5 - 13
  • [49] Evidence-Based Special Education in the Context of Scarce Evidence-Based Practices
    Cook, Bryan G.
    Carter, Erik W.
    Cote, Debra L.
    Kamman, Margaret
    McCarthy, Tessa
    Miller, Michel L.
    Scala, Gina
    Travers, Jason
    TEACHING EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 2014, 47 (02) : 81 - 84
  • [50] Are current scoliosis school screening recommendations evidence-based and up to date? A best evidence synthesis umbrella review
    Plaszewski, Maciej
    Bettany-Saltikov, Josette
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 23 (12) : 2572 - 2585