Collegiate mathematics teaching in proof-based courses: What we now know and what we have yet to learn

被引:19
|
作者
Melhuish, Kathleen [1 ]
Fukawa-Connelly, Timothy [2 ]
Dawkins, Paul C. [1 ]
Woods, Christian [3 ]
Weber, Keith [3 ]
机构
[1] Texas State Univ, Dept Math, 601 Univ Dr, San Marcos, TX 78666 USA
[2] Ritter Hall Temple Univ, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[3] Rutgers State Univ, Grad Sch Educ, Seminary Pl, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
来源
关键词
Advanced mathematics; Instruction; Teaching; Lecture; Proof; Inquiry; ABSTRACT ALGEBRA; UNDERGRADUATE MATHEMATICS; UNIVERSITY MATHEMATICS; NOTE-TAKING; INQUIRY; STUDENTS; LECTURES; INSTRUCTORS; PERSPECTIVES; PROFESSOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.100986
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
There has been significant growth in the literature base exploring questions of teaching in undergraduate mathematics. In this paper we synthesize the literature on the teaching of proofbased undergraduate mathematics, drawing on 104 published reports from a range of countries and research traditions. We primarily differentiate the papers into those which explore lecturebased pedagogy and student-centered pedagogy. For each type of instruction, we focus on three categories of findings from the literature: description of instruction, instructor beliefs and rationales, and the relationship between instruction and students (cognitive, participatory, affective, and equity oriented). Much is known about the enactment of lecture-based teaching, including instructors' cognitive and affective goals. The student-centered literature focuses on tensions and challenges implementing curricula with a greater focus on participatory goals. Overall, there are few studies that attempt to link instructors' classroom activity and students' learning. Similarly, attention to equity is relatively lacking in the extant research.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The changing Nature of atherosclerosis: what we thought we knew, what we think we know, and what we have to learn
    Libby, Peter
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2021, 42 (47) : 4781 - 4782
  • [22] asthma in the elderly: what we know and what we have yet to know (vol 7, 8, 2014)
    Yanez, Anahi
    Cho, Sang-Hoen
    Soriano, Joan B.
    Rosenwasser, Lanny J.
    Rodrigo, Gustavo J.
    Rabe, Klaus F.
    Peters, Stephen
    Niimi, Akio
    Ledford, Dennis K.
    Katial, Rohit
    Hoyte, Flavia C. L.
    Fabbri, Leonardo M.
    Celedon, Juan C.
    Canonica, Giorgio Walter
    Busse, Paula
    Boulet, Louis-Phillippe
    Baena-Cagnani, Carlos E.
    Hamid, Qutayba
    Bachert, Claus
    Pawankar, Ruby
    Holgate, Stephen T.
    WORLD ALLERGY ORGANIZATION JOURNAL, 2014, 7
  • [23] PARP Inhibitors: What We Know and What We Have Yet to Know The Comen/Robson Article Reviewed
    Puhalla, Shannon
    ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK, 2010, 24 (01): : 62 - 66
  • [24] Paediatric Early Warning Systems in 2019: What We Know and What We’ve Yet to Learn
    Fitzsimons J.
    Pentony M.
    Current Treatment Options in Pediatrics, 2019, 5 (4) : 315 - 325
  • [25] Gender Dysphoric/Gender Variant (GD/GV) Children and Adolescents: Summarizing What We Know and What We Have Yet to Learn
    Drescher, Jack
    Byne, William
    JOURNAL OF HOMOSEXUALITY, 2012, 59 (03) : 501 - 510
  • [26] INCLUSIVE EDUCATION - WHAT DO WE KNOW AND WHAT DO WE STILL HAVE TO LEARN
    CIPANI, E
    EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 1995, 61 (05) : 498 - 500
  • [27] Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: What do we know and what will we have to learn?
    Volkova, N. I.
    Porksheyan, M. I.
    TERAPEVTICHESKII ARKHIV, 2017, 89 (02) : 91 - 98
  • [28] Cardiac magnetic resonance in myocarditis. What we know and what we have to learn
    Mavrogeni, Sophie
    Bratis, Konstantinos
    Kolovou, Genovefa
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2011, 13 (12) : 1381 - 1381
  • [29] What we know and what we still need to learn
    Humphreys, J
    Sharps, PW
    Campbell, JC
    JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 2005, 20 (02) : 182 - 187
  • [30] Of What We Know Now
    Joseph, Lawrence
    KENYON REVIEW, 2017, 39 (04): : 66 - 66