Proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion - Minimum 5-year follow-up

被引:192
|
作者
Kim, YJ
Bridwell, KH
Lenke, LG
Kim, J
Cho, SK
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Shriners Hosp Children, St Louis Unit, St Louis, MO USA
关键词
adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; proximal junctional change; segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion; outcomes;
D O I
10.1097/01.brs.0000179084.45839.ad
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A retrospective study. Objective. To analyze the long-term proximal junctional change in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) following segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion 5 years or more after surgery. Summary of Background Data. No study has concentrated on time-dependent long-term proximal junctional change in AIS following segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion after 5 years postoperation. Risk factors for developing proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) are unknown. Methods. A total of 193 consecutive AIS patients with a minimum 5-year follow-up (Average, 7.3 years; range, 5-16.7 years) treated with segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion were evaluated. Radiographic measurements analyzed included sagittal Cobb angle at the proximal junction on preoperative, early postoperation, 2-year postoperation, and final follow-up (>= 5 years) by standing long cassette radiographs. Postoperative Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-24 outcome scores were also evaluated. Abnormal PJK was defined as the final proximal junctional sagittal Cobb angle between the lower endplate of the uppermost instrumented vertebra and the upper endplate of two vertebrae supra-adjacent, which was >10 degrees and at least 10 degrees greater than the preoperative measurement. Results. The incidence of PJK at 7.3 years postoperation was 26% (50 of 193 patients). The average proximal junctional angle increased 15.2 until 2 years postoperation and then increased 1.7 degrees until final follow-up in the PJK group (n=50). Factors that were statistically significant for PJK development were as follows: a thoracoplasty procedure (P=0.001), preoperative hyperkyphotic thoracic alignment (T5-T12>40 degrees) (P=0.015), and hybrid instrumentation (proximal hooks and distal pedicle screws) compared with the hooks only group (P=0.029). The number of fused vertebrae more than 11 was also related with PJK (P=0.08). The level of the uppermost instrumented vertebra did not affect the PJK incidence. SRS-24 outcome scores did not demonstrate any significant differences (P=0.54 for total score and P=0.49 for self-image subscale) between the PJK and non-PJK groups. Conclusion. The incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis at 7.3 years postoperation was 26% and did not progress significantly after 2 years postoperation. Risk factors for developing PJK were an associated thoracoplasty, hybrid instrumentation (proximal hooks and distal pedicle screws), and a preoperative larger sagittal thoracic Cobb angle (T5-T12>40 degrees). The SRS-24 outcome instrument was not affected by PJK.
引用
收藏
页码:2045 / 2050
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Proximal junctional kyphosis following correction surgery in the Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patient
    Zhao, Jian
    Yang, Mingyuan
    Yang, Yiling
    Chen, Ziqiang
    Li, Ming
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2018, 23 (05) : 744 - 749
  • [22] Selective Thoracic Fusion for Idiopathic Scoliosis A Comparison of Three Surgical Techniques with Minimum 5-year Follow-up
    Ruiz, John N. M.
    Kandwal, Pankaj
    Lau, Leok Lim
    Liu, Gabriel Ka Po
    Thambiah, Joseph
    Wong, Hee-Kit
    SPINE, 2022, 47 (07) : E272 - E282
  • [23] Effectiveness of cross-linking posterior segmental instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a 2-year follow-up comparative study
    Dhawale, Arjun A.
    Shah, Suken A.
    Yorgova, Petya
    Neiss, Geraldine
    Layer, Douglas J., Jr.
    Rogers, Kenneth J.
    Gabos, Peter G.
    Holmes, Laurens, Jr.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 13 (11): : 1485 - 1492
  • [24] Prediction of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis After Posterior Scoliosis Surgery With Machine Learning in the Lenke 5 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patient
    Peng, Li
    Lan, Lan
    Xiu, Peng
    Zhang, Guangming
    Hu, Bowen
    Yang, Xi
    Song, Yueming
    Yang, Xiaoyan
    Gu, Yonghong
    Yang, Rui
    Zhou, Xiaobo
    FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2020, 8
  • [25] Effect of surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis on the quality of life: a prospective study with a minimum 5-year follow-up
    Massimo Mariconda
    Claudia Andolfi
    Simone Cerbasi
    Valeria Servodidio
    European Spine Journal, 2016, 25 : 3331 - 3340
  • [26] POSTERIOR SPINAL-FUSION AND INSTRUMENTATION IN THE TREATMENT OF ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS
    YOUNGMAN, PME
    EDGAR, MA
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 1985, 67 (05) : 313 - 317
  • [27] Effect of surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis on the quality of life: a prospective study with a minimum 5-year follow-up
    Mariconda, Massimo
    Andolfi, Claudia
    Cerbasi, Simone
    Servodidio, Valeria
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 25 (10) : 3331 - 3340
  • [28] Bone Mineral Density After Spinal Fusion Surgery for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis at a Minimum 20-Year Follow-up
    Ohashi M.
    Hirano T.
    Watanabe K.
    Katsumi K.
    Shoji H.
    Mizouchi T.
    Endo N.
    Spine Deformity, 2018, 6 (2) : 170 - 176
  • [29] The effects of spinal fusion on lumbar disc degeneration in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A minimum 10-year follow-Up
    Nohara A.
    Kawakami N.
    Seki K.
    Tsuji T.
    Ohara T.
    Saito T.
    Kawakami K.
    Spine Deformity, 2015, 3 (5) : 462 - 468
  • [30] Spinal deformity progression after posterior segmental instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis
    Upasani, Vidyadhar V.
    Hedequist, Daniel J.
    Hresko, M. Timothy
    Karlin, Lawrence I.
    Emans, John B.
    Glotzbecker, Michael P.
    JOURNAL OF CHILDRENS ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 9 (01) : 29 - 37