Management of diabetes in pregnancy: Comparison of guidelines with current practice at Austrian and Australian obstetric center

被引:5
|
作者
Zeck, Willibald [1 ,2 ]
Panzitt, Thomas [1 ]
Schlembach, Dietmar [1 ]
Lang, Uwe [1 ]
McIntyre, David [3 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Graz, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, A-8036 Graz, Austria
[2] Mater Misericordiae Mothers Hosp, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hosp, Sch Med, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.3325/cmj.2007.6.831
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim To compare Austrian and Australian national guidelines for gestational and pre-gestational diabetes and estimate the level to which physicians comply with their country's guidelines. Methods Austrian (ODG, Austrian Diabetes Society) and Australian guidelines (ADIPS, Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society) for the treatment of gestational diabetes and pre-gestational diabetes were systematically reviewed. Current practices in two obstetric centers in Austria and Australia were assessed by interviewing key stakeholders through questionnaires assessing different components of diabetes care. For gestational diabetes, these components were screening, abnormal oral glucose tolerance test values (mmol/L), abnormal values for diagnosis, further management when abnormal values are detected, monitoring/glucose targets (mmol/L), further management and indications for insulin therapy, route and timing of delivery, and postpartum management and counseling. For pre-gestational diabetes, the components were management during the preconceptional period, glucose target values, medical surveillance, obstetric surveillance, medication used, route and timing of delivery, and postpartum management and counseling. Results More variation was found in the management of gestational than pre-gestational diabetes. There were differences in oral glucose tolerance test and cut-off levels for diagnosing gestational diabetes in both centers and guidelines. Australian guidelines recommended two-stage screening for gestational diabetes, while Austrian guidelines recommended one-stage screening. At the Austrian obstetric center, amniocentesis was recommended for determining the start of insulin treatment in pregnant women with gestational diabetes. This approach was neither used at the Australian obstetric center nor recommended by any of the two guidelines. Conclusion Our study showed that it was difficult to standardize screening criteria and diagnostic methods for gestational and pre-gestational diabetes. National and international consensus has yet to be achieved in the management of diabetes in pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页码:831 / 841
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The management of recurrent genital herpes infection in pregnancy: A postal survey of obstetric practice
    Jolly, J
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1996, 103 (07): : 722 - 723
  • [42] THE MANAGEMENT OF RECURRENT GENITAL HERPES INFECTION IN PREGNANCY - A POSTAL SURVEY OF OBSTETRIC PRACTICE
    BROCKLEHURST, P
    CARNEY, O
    ROSS, E
    MINDEL, A
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1995, 102 (10): : 791 - 797
  • [43] Diabetes detection in Australian general practice: a comparison of diagnostic criteria
    Hilton, DJ
    O'Rourke, PK
    Welborn, TA
    Reid, CM
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2002, 176 (03) : 104 - 107
  • [44] Current best practice in the management of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy
    Townsend, Rosemary
    O'Brien, Patrick
    Khalil, Asma
    [J]. INTEGRATED BLOOD PRESSURE CONTROL, 2016, 9 : 79 - 94
  • [45] Current guidelines for the evaluation and management of atopic dermatitis: A comparison of the Joint Task Force Practice Parameter and American Academy of Dermatology guidelines
    Eichenfield, Lawrence F.
    Ahluwalia, Jusleen
    Waldman, Andrea
    Borok, Jenna
    Udkoff, Jeremy
    Boguniewicz, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2017, 139 (04) : S49 - S57
  • [46] Current dietetic practices of obesity management in Saudi Arabia and comparison with Australian practices and best practice criteria
    Almajwal, Ali
    Williams, Peter
    Batterham, Marijka
    [J]. NUTRITION & DIETETICS, 2009, 66 (02) : 94 - 100
  • [47] Ulcerative colitis management: a survey on current practice by Australian gastroenterologists
    Walker, N. M.
    Andrews, J.
    Walsh, A.
    Radford-Smith, G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 26 : 66 - 66
  • [48] Current Australian practice in the diagnosis and management of Barrett's oesophagus
    Farfus, Anthony W.
    Griffiths, Ewen A.
    Thompson, Sarah K.
    Devitt, Peter G.
    [J]. ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 83 (12) : 895 - 898
  • [49] Wilderness Medical Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diabetes Management
    VanBaak, Karin D.
    Nally, Laura M.
    Finigan, Ryan T.
    Jurkiewicz, Carrie L.
    Burnier, Andre M.
    Conrad, Barry P.
    Khodaee, Morteza
    Lipman, Grant S.
    [J]. WILDERNESS & ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2019, 30 (04) : S121 - S140
  • [50] DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF TESTOSTERONE DEFICIENCY - COMPARISON OF CURRENT GUIDELINES
    Kwong, Jethro C. C.
    Krakowsky, Yonah
    Grober, Ethan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E587 - E588