Nondrug therapies for hypertensive patients complicated with cervical spondylosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:7
|
作者
Wang, Xinyi [1 ]
Ju, Jianqing [2 ,3 ]
Xu, Hao [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Chinese Med, Grad Sch, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] China Acad Chinese Med Sci, Xiyuan Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Clin Res Ctr Chinese Med Cardiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
cervical spondylosis; hypertension; meta-analysis; nondrug therapy; systematic review; VENTROLATERAL MEDULLA; BLOOD-PRESSURE; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000019006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose:The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of nondrug therapies for hypertensive patients complicated with cervical spondylosis.Methods:Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerned with nondrug therapies for hypertensive patients complicated with cervical spondylosis were identified by searching 5 English and Chinese databases. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted independently by 2 authors. RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis with effect estimate presented as relative risk (RR) and mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).Results:A total of 13 studies involving 929 patients were included. The majority of the included trials were assessed to be of high clinical heterogeneity and high risk of bias. The results of meta-analysis showed that there was a significant improvement in the effectiveness rate of cervical vertebra symptoms (RR=1.67, 95% CI [1.33, 2.10], P<.0001), effectiveness rate of blood pressure lowering (RR=1.35, 95% CI [1.06, 1.71], P=.02), systolic blood pressure reduction (MD=-11.05, 95% CI [-14.12, -7.98] mmHg, P<.0001), and diastolic blood pressure reduction (MD=-6.96, 95% CI [-8.89, -5.04] mmHg, P<.00001). Nondrug therapies had no significant difference compared with drugs in the effectiveness rate of overall improvement (RR=1.3, 95% CI [0.93, 1.82], P=.12). There were no serious adverse effects related to nondrug therapies in the included trials.Conclusion:The results show sound advantages of nondrug therapies over conventional medicine or sham procedure in efficacy. However, the evidence remains weak because of the high clinical heterogeneity and high risk of the included trials. Therefore, further thorough investigation, large-scale, proper-designed, randomized trials of nondrug therapies for hypertension complicated with cervical spondylosis are warranted.Prospero registration number:CRD2019123175.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cervical musculoskeletal disorders in patients with temporomandibular dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    de Oliveira-Souza, Ana Izabela S.
    Ferro, Josepha Karinne de O.
    Barros, Manuella M. M. B.
    de Oliveira, Daniella A.
    JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2020, 24 (04) : 84 - 101
  • [42] META-ANALYSIS OF NIFEDIPINE AND ENALAPRIL COMBINATION THERAPY FOR HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS WITH CORONARY HEART DISEASE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Wang, Kun
    Ma, Wenchao
    Sun, Leina
    Su, Fangcheng
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2025, 44 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [43] Therapies for bruxism: a systematic review and network meta-analysis (protocol)
    Mauro Elias Mesko
    Brian Hutton
    Jovito Adiel Skupien
    Rafael Sarkis-Onofre
    David Moher
    Tatiana Pereira-Cenci
    Systematic Reviews, 6
  • [44] Laughter-inducing therapies: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    van der Wal, C. Natalie
    Kok, Robin N.
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2019, 232 : 473 - 488
  • [45] Gastroenteritis Therapies in Developed Countries: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Freedman, Stephen B.
    Pasichnyk, Dion
    Black, Karen J. L.
    Fitzpatrick, Eleanor
    Gouin, Serge
    Milne, Andrea
    Hartling, Lisa
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (06):
  • [46] Drug Therapies for Ulcerative Proctitis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Lie, Mitchell R. K. L.
    Kanis, Shannon L.
    Hansen, Bettina E.
    van der Woude, C. Janneke
    INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, 2014, 20 (11) : 2157 - 2178
  • [47] Therapies for bruxism: a systematic review and network meta-analysis (protocol)
    Mesko, Mauro Elias
    Hutton, Brian
    Skupien, Jovito Adiel
    Sarkis-Onofre, Rafael
    Moher, David
    Pereira-Cenci, Tatiana
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, 6
  • [48] A systematic review and meta-analysis of misuse of antibiotic therapies in the community
    Kardas, P
    Devine, S
    Golembesky, A
    Roberts, C
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2005, 26 (02) : 106 - 113
  • [49] Effectiveness of smoking cessation therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Ping
    Wilson, Kumanan
    Dimoulas, Popey
    Mills, Edward J.
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2006, 6 (1)
  • [50] Physical therapies for Achilles tendinopathy: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sussmilch-Leitch, Samuel P.
    Collins, Natalie J.
    Bialocerkowski, Andrea E.
    Warden, Stuart J.
    Crossley, Kay M.
    JOURNAL OF FOOT AND ANKLE RESEARCH, 2012, 5