Reliability and Reproducibility of the Edmondson Grading of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Paired Core Biopsy and Surgical Resection Specimens

被引:10
|
作者
Pirisi, Mario [1 ]
Leutner, Monica [3 ]
Pinato, David J. [1 ]
Avellini, Claudio [4 ]
Carsana, Luca [3 ]
Toniutto, Pierluigi [5 ,6 ]
Fabris, Carlo [5 ,6 ]
Boldorini, Renzo [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Piemonte Orientale, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Novara, Italy
[2] Univ Piemonte Orientale, Dept Med Sci, Novara, Italy
[3] AOU Maggiore Carita, Dept Pathol, Novara, Italy
[4] Univ Udine, Dept Med & Morphol Res, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[5] Univ Udine, Dept Expt & Clin Pathol, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[6] Univ Udine, Dept Med, I-33100 Udine, Italy
关键词
LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION; HISTOLOGICAL GRADE; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; IMPACT; PARAMETERS; AGREEMENT; OUTCOMES; CANCER; HCC;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Context.-It has been claimed that the Edmondson and Steiner grading system (EGS) values should be obtained preoperatively to select patients with hepatocellular carcinoma for liver transplantation. However, EGS reliability in biopsy specimens has been questioned. Objective.-To verify the reliability of the EGS using core biopsy specimens and its reproducibility among pathologists. Design.-Paired biopsy and surgical specimens obtained from 40 patients (subset 1) were retrieved by means of computer-aided search of the pathology records and blindly and independently reviewed. The EGS interrater agreement was measured using kappa statistics. After having held a consensus meeting, pathologists graded an additional 21 paired hepatocellular carcinoma specimens (subset 2). Results.-Analyzing subset 1, pathologists gave significantly lower EGS grades to the biopsy specimens (P < .001), for which the observed agreement was 32.5% (kappa = 0.021), which increased to 82.5% (kappa = 0.186) if only 2 categories were considered (low grade, EGS I-II; high grade, EGS III-IV). The observed agreement in the case of the surgical specimens was 52.5% (kappa = 0.199), which increased to 62.5% (kappa = 0.275) when the low- and high-grade scores were merged. The observed agreement between the assessments of paired biopsy and surgical specimens was 50.0% for pathologist 1 (kappa = 0.057) and 35.0% for pathologist 2 (kappa = 0.078). Merging the EGS grades did not improve the strength of the agreement. Analyzing subset 2 (after the consensus meeting), the observed agreement between pathologists improved more on biopsies (76.2%, kappa = 0.614) than on surgical specimens (61.9%, kappa = 0.434). Conclusions.-The EGS is easily underestimated in core biopsy specimens, and interrater disagreement between pathologists can be significant unless consensus meetings are held. (Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010;134:1818-1822)
引用
收藏
页码:1818 / 1822
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Agreement between core needle biopsy and surgical excision product: the importance of the invasive breast carcinoma grading system
    Rodrigo Justi Nogueira
    Thales Müller Silvério Alves
    Mário Jefferson Quirino Louzada
    Deolino João Camilo-Júnior
    José Cândido Caldeira Xavier-Júnior
    Virchows Archiv, 2022, 480 : 713 - 714
  • [22] Is the 21-Gene Recurrence Score on Core Needle Biopsy Equivalent to Surgical Specimen in Early-Stage Breast Cancer? A Comparison of Gene Expression Between Paired Core Needle Biopsy and Surgical Specimens
    Javier I. J. Orozco
    Shu-Ching Chang
    Chikako Matsuba
    Miquel Ensenyat-Mendez
    Gary L. Grunkemeier
    Diego M. Marzese
    Janie G. Grumley
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2021, 28 : 5588 - 5596
  • [23] Is the 21-Gene Recurrence Score on Core Needle Biopsy Equivalent to Surgical Specimen in Early-Stage Breast Cancer? A Comparison of Gene Expression Between Paired Core Needle Biopsy and Surgical Specimens
    Orozco, Javier I. J.
    Chang, Shu-Ching
    Matsuba, Chikako
    Ensenyat-Mendez, Miquel
    Grunkemeier, Gary L.
    Marzese, Diego M.
    Grumley, Janie G.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (10) : 5588 - 5596
  • [24] Factors influencing agreement of Ki67 labeling index between core needle biopsy and surgical resection specimens
    Bago-Horvath, Zsuzsanna
    Roessler, Fabian
    Wimmer, Philipp
    Mittlboeck, Martina
    Kozakowski, Nicolas
    Pinker-Domenig, Katja
    Bartsch, Rupert
    Dubsky, Peter
    Filipits, Martin
    Rudas, Margaretha
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 75
  • [25] Concordance of HER2 status assessed on needle core biopsy and surgical specimens of invasive carcinoma of the breast
    Lee, Andrew H. S.
    Key, Heather P.
    Bell, Jane A.
    Hodi, Zsolt
    Ellis, Ian O.
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2012, 60 (06) : 880 - 884
  • [26] Myoepithelial Marker Expression in Breast Core Biopsy High Grade DCIS as a Predictor of Invasive Carcinoma in Subsequent Resection Specimens
    Luo, G.
    Somoza, A.
    Hill, G.
    Zhai, Q.
    Lucas, F.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2010, 23 : 61A - 61A
  • [27] Correlation between the status of resection margins in lumpectomy specimens for ductal carcinoma of the breast, core biopsy and mammographic findings.
    Chaudhuri, M
    Mai, KT
    Yazdi, HM
    Perkins, DG
    Mirsky, D
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2001, 81 (01) : 23A - 23A
  • [28] Myoepithelial Marker Expression in Breast Core Biopsy High Grade DCIS as a Predictor of Invasive Carcinoma in Subsequent Resection Specimens
    Luo, G.
    Somoza, A.
    Hill, G.
    Zhai, Q.
    Lucas, F.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2010, 90 : 61A - 61A
  • [29] Correlation between the status of resection margins in lumpectomy specimens for ductal carcinoma of the breast. Core biopsy and mammographic findings.
    Chaudhuri, M
    Mai, KT
    Yazdi, HM
    Perkins, DG
    Mirsky, D
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2001, 14 (01) : 23A - 23A
  • [30] ASO Visual Abstract: Is the 21-Gene Recurrence Score on Core Needle Biopsy Equivalent to Surgical Specimen in Early-Stage Breast Cancer?A Comparison of Gene Expression Between Paired Core Needle Biopsy and Surgical Specimens
    Javier I. J. Orozco
    Shu-Ching Chang
    Chikako Matsuba
    Miquel Ensenyat-Mendez
    Gary L. Grunkemeier
    Diego M. Marzese
    Janie G. Grumley
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2021, 28 : 643 - 644