Randomized, two-way crossover bioequivalence study of levamlodipine besylate tablets in healthy Chinese subjects

被引:8
|
作者
Xu, Su-Mei [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Yu-Lu [1 ,2 ]
Li, Dan [1 ]
Li, Xiao-Min [1 ]
Li, Dai [1 ]
Xu, Ping-Sheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Natl Inst Drug Clin Trial, Xiangya Hosp, Changsha 410008, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp, Dept Pharm, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
levamlodipine; pharmacokinetics; bioequivalent; PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY; HUMAN PLASMA; HPLC METHOD; AMLODIPINE; HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE; HYPERTENSION; COMBINATION; VALIDATION; VALSARTAN;
D O I
10.5414/CP202998
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objective: The present bioequivalence study was designed to compare the newly-developed levamlodipine besylate 2.5-mg tablet (test) with that of its 2.5-mg marketed counterpart (reference) in healthy Chinese adult male volunteers. Methods: A single-dose, randomized, open-label, twoperiod, and two-treatment self-crossover study was conducted in healthy Chinese volunteers after informed consent was obtained. In each part of the study, the subjects were randomly assigned to receive the test or reference product (5 mg levamlodipine) in a 1 : 1 ratio, and then received the alternative product, following a 14-day washout period. Plasma levamlodipine concentrations were analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters (noncompartmental model) were assessed with WinNonlin software. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and FDA (USA) bioequivalence statistical criterion of 90% CI for 80 - 125% range (set at p = 0.05) of geometric means ratios of test : reference product for Cmax, AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-infinity) were determined. Tolerability was assessed during the entire study period. Results: ANOVA indicated that the period, sequence, and formulation had no significant effect on the PK parameters (p = 0.05), although there was a statistically-significant difference between formulations in AUC(0-t) (p = 0.05). The test formulation was bioequivalent to the marketed formulation as the 90% CI for the ratio of geometric means of Cmax (84.52 - 103.00%), AUC(0-t) (87.49 - 98.23%), and AUC(0-infinity) (84.30 -103.25%) were within equivalence limits (80 - 125%) under fasting condition. No serious adverse events were found among the subjects. Conclusion: This study confirmed that test and reference levamlodipine besylate tablets were bioequivalent under fasting condition.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] BIOEQUIVALENCE OF TWO FORMULATIONS OF GLICLAZIDE IN A RANDOMIZED CROSSOVER STUDY IN HEALTHY CAUCASIAN SUBJECTS UNDER FED CONDITION
    Pop, Diana Ioana
    Oroian, Monica
    Bhardwaj, Sandeep
    Marcovici, Adriana
    Khuroo, Arshad
    Kochhar, Ravi
    Vlase, Laurian
    FARMACIA, 2018, 66 (04) : 597 - 601
  • [32] Bioequivalence of Two Formulations of Gliclazide in a Randomized Crossover Study in Healthy Caucasian Subjects Under Fasting Conditions
    Pop, Diana Ioana
    Oroian, Monica
    Bhardwaj, Sandeep
    Marcovici, Adriana
    Khuroo, Arshad
    Kochhar, Ravi
    Vlase, Laurian
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 8 (01): : 16 - 21
  • [33] A randomized, crossover, phase I clinical study to evaluate bioequivalence and safety of tofacitinib and Xeljanz? in Chinese healthy subjects
    Xu, Zhongnan
    Wang, Yanli
    Liu, Zhengzhi
    Zhang, Renjie
    Zhou, Yannan
    Yu, Jing
    Lan, Jing
    Liang, Wenzhong
    Liu, Guangwen
    Qu, Xinyao
    Chen, Jiahui
    Su, Zhengjie
    Yu, Shuang
    Cheng, Yang
    Wang, Wanhua
    Ren, Qing
    Deng, Qiaohuan
    Zhao, Yicheng
    Yang, Haimiao
    INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 109
  • [34] Bioequivalence of two misoprostol tablets in healthy Chinese volunteers: a single dose, single blind, two period, double crossover study
    Guo, R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2012, 73 (06) : 997 - 997
  • [35] Single-dose, Two-way Crossover, Bioequivalence Study of Mycophenolate Mofetil 500 mg Tablet Under Fasting Conditions in Healthy Male Subjects
    Patel, Shashank
    Chauhan, Vijay
    Mandal, Jayanta
    Shah, Samir
    Patel, Keyur
    Saptarshi, Dipak
    Maheshwari, Kirti
    Jha, Pankaj Kumar
    Kale, Prashant
    Patel, Kamlesh
    Mathew, Philip
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2011, 33 (03) : 378 - 390
  • [36] Bioequivalence and Pharmacokinetic Comparison of Two Mycophenolate Mofetil Formulations in Healthy Chinese Male Volunteers: An Open-Label, Randomized-Sequence, Single-Dose, Two-Way Crossover Study
    Zhang, Qian
    Tao, Yifu
    Zhu, Yubing
    Zhu, Dingchun
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 32 (01) : 171 - 178
  • [37] Bioequivalence Study of Atenolol Tablets in Healthy Chinese Subjects Under Fasting and Fed Conditions
    Li, Yongtao
    Huang, Yingying
    Fu, Xihua
    Xia, Jiajing
    Su, Jianfen
    Gu, Wenzhao
    Liu, Weixiong
    Jian, Jianqing
    Xu, Zuoheng
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 13 (08): : 870 - 875
  • [38] Pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence study of emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets in healthy Chinese subjects
    Lu, Chao
    Yang, Yaru
    Zhang, Qian
    Zhou, Renpeng
    Liu, Zeyuan
    Hu, Wei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 57 (12) : 623 - 632
  • [39] Lack of Bioequivalence between Two Aciclovir Tablets in Healthy Subjects
    Hossein Amini
    Mohammad Javan
    Parisa Gazerani
    Alireza Ghaffari
    Abolhassan Ahmadiani
    Clinical Drug Investigation, 2008, 28 : 47 - 53
  • [40] Lack of bioequivalence between two aciclovir tablets in healthy subjects
    Amini, Hossein
    Javan, Mohammad
    Gazerani, Parisa
    Ghaffari, Alireza
    Ahmadiani, Abolhassan
    CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2008, 28 (01) : 47 - 53