Shared expectations for protection of identifiable health care information - Report of a national consensus process

被引:11
|
作者
Wynia, MK
Coughlin, SS
Alpert, S
Cummins, DS
Emanuel, LL
机构
[1] Amer Med Assoc, Inst Eth, Chicago, IL 60610 USA
[2] Ctr Dis Control, Atlanta, GA 30333 USA
[3] Univ Notre Dame, South Bend, IN USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Sch Med, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
关键词
health policy; health care information;
D O I
10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.00515.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The Ethical Force Program is a collaborative effort to create performance measures for ethics in health care. This report lays out areas of consensus that may be amenable to performance measurement on protecting the privacy, confidentiality and security of identifiable health information. DESIGN: Iterative consensus development process. PARTICIPANTS: The program's oversight body and its expert panel on privacy include national leaders representing the perspectives of physicians, patients, purchasers, health plans, hospitals, and medical ethicists as well as public health, law, and medical informatics experts. METHODS AND MAIN RESULTS: The oversight body appointed a national Expert Advisory Panel on Privacy and Confidentiality in September 1998. This group compiled and reviewed existing norms, including governmental reports and legal standards, professional association policies, private organization statements and policies, accreditation standards, and ethical opinions. A set of specific and assessable expectations for ethical conduct in this domain was then drafted and refined through seven meetings over 16 months. In the final two iterations, each expectation was graded on a scale of 1 to 10 by each oversight body member on whether it was: (1) important, (2) universally applicable, (3) feasible to measure, and (4) realistic to implement. The expectations that did not score more than 7 (mean) on all 4 scales were reconsidered and retained only if the entire oversight body agreed that they should be used as potential subjects for performance measurement. Consensus was achieved on 34 specific expectations. The expectations fell into 8 content areas: addressing the need for transparency of policies and practices, consent for use and disclosure of identifiable information, limitations on what information can be collected and by whom, individuals' access to their own health records, security requirements for storage and transfer of information, provisions to ensure ongoing data quality, limitations on how identifiable information may be used, and provisions for meaningful accountability. CONCLUSIONS: This process established consensus on 34 measurable ethical expectations for the: protection of privacy and confidentiality in health care. These expectations should apply to any organization with access to personally identifiable health information, including managed care organizations, physician groups, hospitals, other provider organizations, and purchasers. Performance measurement on these expectations may improve accountability across the health care system.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 111
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Data protection, information governance and the potential erosion of ethnographic methods in health care?
    Lee, Rebecca R.
    McDonagh, Janet E.
    Farre, Albert
    Peters, Sarah
    Cordingley, Lis
    Rapley, Tim
    [J]. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS, 2022, 44 (01) : 211 - 217
  • [42] MENTAL HEALTH AND POLYCYSTIC OVARY SYNDROME (PCOS): EXAMINING INFORMATION SHARED TO WOMEN OF COLOR BY HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS
    Zamora, Mayra
    Sabado-Liwag, Melanie
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2020, 54 : S667 - S667
  • [43] Shared. Decision-Making: Guidelines From the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
    Raleigh, Meghan F.
    Nelson, Madalyn D.
    Nguyen, Dana R.
    [J]. AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2022, 106 (02) : 205 - 207
  • [44] Developing an Interprofessional Health Care Improvement Portfolio: Results From a Consensus Panel Process
    Godwin, Kyler M.
    Horstman, Molly J.
    Chao, Samantha
    Dolansky, Mary
    Al Mohajer, Mayar
    Naik, Aanand D.
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2022, 97 (04) : 503 - 509
  • [45] The Norwegian National Summary Care Record: a qualitative analysis of doctors' use of and trust in shared patient information
    Dyb, Kari
    Warth, Line Lundvoll
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 18
  • [46] The Norwegian National Summary Care Record: a qualitative analysis of doctors’ use of and trust in shared patient information
    Kari Dyb
    Line Lundvoll Warth
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 18
  • [47] A national action plan to meet health care quality information needs in the age of managed care
    Shaller, DV
    Sharpe, RS
    Rubin, RD
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 279 (16): : 1254 - 1258
  • [48] Implementing health information technology to improve the process of health care delivery: A case study
    Follen, Marilyn
    Castaneda, Rachel
    Mikelson, Melissa
    Johnson, Debrah
    Wilson, Alisa
    Higuchi, Keiko
    [J]. DISEASE MANAGEMENT, 2007, 10 (04): : 208 - 215
  • [49] Artificial Intelligence in Health Care A Report From the National Academy of Medicine
    Matheny, Michael E.
    Whicher, Danielle
    Thadaney Israni, Sonoo
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 323 (06): : 509 - 510
  • [50] Commentary: Point-counterpoint - The National Health Care Quality Report
    Silfen, E
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2002, 17 (03) : 86 - 88