Establishing a limit of recognition for a vapor sensor array

被引:47
|
作者
Zellers, ET [1 ]
Park, J
Hsu, T
Groves, WA
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Environm & Ind Hlth, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Chem, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Dept Prevent Med & Environm Hlth, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ac980344w
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Organic vapor analysis with microsensor arrays relies principally on two output parameters: the response pattern, which provides qualitative information, and the response sensitivity, which determines the limit of detection (LOD). The latter is used to define the operating limit in the low-concentration range, under the implicit assumption that, if a vapor can be detected, it can be identified and differentiated from other vapors on the basis of its response pattern. In this study, the performance of an array of four polymer-coated surface acoustic wave vapor sensors was explored using calibrated response data from 16 solvent vapors in Monte Carlo simulations coupled with pattern recognition analysis. The statistical modeling revealed that the ability to recognize a vapor from its response pattern decreases with decreasing vapor concentration, as expected, but also that the concentration at which errors in vapor recognition become excessive is well above the calculated LOD in most cases, despite the LOD being based on the least sensitive sensor in the array. These results suggest the adoption of a limit of recognition (LOR), defined as the concentration below which a vapor can no longer be reliably recognized from its response pattern, as an additional criterion for evaluating the performance of multisensor arrays. ih generalized method for estimating the LOR is presented, as well as a means for improving the LOR via residual error analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:4191 / 4201
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Harmful Gas Recognition Exploiting a CTL Sensor Array
    Wang, Qihui
    Xie, Lijun
    Zhu, Bo
    Zheng, Yao
    Cao, Shihua
    SENSORS, 2013, 13 (10) : 13509 - 13520
  • [22] Galfenol Whisker Sensor Array for Texture Recognition and Reconstruction
    Weng L.
    Luo X.
    Qi F.
    Li Z.
    Liu K.
    Diangong Jishu Xuebao/Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2024, 39 (04): : 966 - 975
  • [23] Pattern recognition of a gas sensor array using impedance
    Lee, YS
    Joo, BS
    Choi, NJ
    Kang, BH
    Lee, DD
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 2000, 37 (06) : 862 - 865
  • [24] Preprocessing of SAW Sensor Array Data and Pattern Recognition
    Jha, Sunil K.
    Yadava, R. D. S.
    IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (10) : 1202 - 1208
  • [25] Activity Recognition Based on Thermopile Imaging Array Sensor
    Liang, Qingshan
    Yu, Lei
    Zhai, Xuping
    Wan, Zaihong
    Nie, Hong
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRO/INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (EIT), 2018, : 770 - 773
  • [26] SINGLE SH-SAW SENSOR AS A DISTRIBUTED SENSOR ARRAY FOR LIQUIDS RECOGNITION
    Kryshtal, R. G.
    Medved, A. V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON SMART SENSING AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2009, 2 (04): : 602 - 611
  • [27] Chemiresistive ionogel sensor array for the detection and discrimination of volatile organic vapor
    Zhu, Xiangrong
    Zhang, Haijuan
    Wu, Jianmin
    SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL, 2014, 202 : 105 - 113
  • [28] Porous graphene oxide chemi-capacitor vapor sensor array
    Teradal, Nagappa L.
    Marx, Sharon
    Morag, Ahiud
    Jelinek, Raz
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C, 2017, 5 (05) : 1128 - 1135
  • [29] QCM virtual sensor array: Vapor identification and molecular weight approximation
    Speller, Nicholas C.
    Siraj, Noureen
    McCarter, Kevin S.
    Vaughan, Stephanie
    Warner, Isiah M.
    SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL, 2017, 246 : 952 - 960
  • [30] PIEZOELECTRIC CRYSTAL SENSOR ARRAY USED AS AN ORGANIC VAPOR SENSING SYSTEM
    CAO, Z
    LIN, HG
    WANG, BF
    WANG, KM
    YU, RQ
    MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 52 (02) : 174 - 180