A randomized controlled trial of synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in RDS

被引:74
|
作者
Bhandari, V.
Gavino, R. G.
Nedrelow, J. H.
Pallela, P.
Salvador, A.
Ehrenkranz, R. A.
Brodsky, N. L.
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Dept Pediat, Sch Med, Div Perinatal Med, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Albert Einstein Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, Philadelphia, PA 19141 USA
关键词
premature newborn; surfactant; nasal ventilation; non-invasive ventilation;
D O I
10.1038/sj.jp.7211805
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Comparison of outcomes of infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), post-surfactant, extubated to synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) or continued on conventional ventilation (CV). Study Design: Prospective post-surfactant randomized controlled trial of primary mode SNIPPV compared with CV in infants ( born from July 2000 to March 2005) with birth weights ( BW) of 600 to 1250 g. Primary mode SNIPPV was defined as its use in the acute phase of RDS, following the administration of the first dose of surfactant. Result: There were no significant differences in the maternal demographics, antenatal steroid use, mode of delivery, BW, gestational age, gender or Apgar at 5 min between infants continued on CV (n = 21) and those extubated to primary mode SNIPPV ( n 20). Significantly, more babies in the CV group had the primary outcome of bronchopulmonary dysplasia ( BPD)/death, compared to the SNIPPV group ( 52 versus 20%, P = 0.03). There was no difference in the incidence of other common neonatal morbidities. There were no differences in the Mental or Psychomotor Developmental Index scores on follow-up between the two groups. Conclusion: Infants of BW 600 to 1250 g with RDS receiving surfactant with early extubation to SNIPPV had a significantly lower incidence of BPD/death. Primary mode SNIPPV is a feasible method of ventilation in small premature infants.
引用
收藏
页码:697 / 703
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Carbon Dioxide Level between Nasal High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation and Synchronized Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation after Extubation in Neonates: A Cross-over Randomized Controlled Trial
    Baingam, Kulthida
    Phatigomet, Manapat
    Thatrimontrichai, Anucha
    Maneenil, Gunlawadee
    Dissaneevate, Supaporn
    Janjindamai, Waricha
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2024, 41 (11) : 1495 - 1503
  • [22] Early Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP) for Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) in Infants of 28-36 weeks gestational age: a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Skariah, Tisha Ann
    Lewis, Leslie Edward
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF NEONATOLOGY, 2019, 10 (02) : 1 - 8
  • [23] Comparison of non-synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial
    Jasani, Bonny
    Nanavati, Ruchi
    Kabra, Nandkishor
    Rajdeo, Shankar
    Bhandari, Vineet
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2016, 29 (10): : 1546 - 1551
  • [24] Synchronized Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation of the Newborn: Technical Issues and Clinical Results
    Moretti, Corrado
    Gizzi, Camilla
    Montecchia, Francesco
    Barbara, Caterina Silvia
    Midulla, Fabio
    Sanchez-Luna, Manuel
    Papoff, Paola
    NEONATOLOGY, 2016, 109 (04) : 359 - 365
  • [25] Initial Treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome with Nasal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Armanian, Amir-Mohammad
    Badiee, Zohreh
    Heidari, Ghobad
    Feizi, Awat
    Salehimehr, Nima
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 5 (12) : 1543 - 1551
  • [26] Synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) decreases work of breathing (WOB) in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) compared to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP)
    Aghai, Zubair H.
    Saslow, Judy G.
    Nakhla, Tarek
    Milcarek, Barry
    Hart, James
    Lawrysh-Plunkett, Robyn
    Stahl, Gary
    Habib, Robert H.
    Pyon, Kee H.
    PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, 2006, 41 (09) : 875 - 881
  • [27] NASAL INTERMITTENT POSITIVE PRESSURE VENTILATION VERSUS NASAL CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE FOR NEONATAL RESPIRATORY FAILURE: A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED STUDY
    Tang, S.
    Shi, Y.
    Shen, J.
    Hu, Z.
    Li, H.
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2010, 68 : 260 - 261
  • [28] Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for neonatal respiratory failure: a prospective, randomized, controlled study
    Shi, Y.
    Tang, S.
    Shen, J.
    Li, H.
    KLINISCHE PADIATRIE, 2010, 222 : S12 - S12
  • [29] Reintubation Rate between Nasal High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation versus Synchronized Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation in Neonates: A Parallel Randomized Controlled Trial (Jun, 10.1055/a-2118-5351, 2023)
    Phatigomet, Manapat
    Thatrimontrichai, Anucha
    Maneenil, Gunlawadee
    Dissaneevate, Supaporn
    Janjindamai, Waricha
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2024, 41 (11) : e2 - e2
  • [30] Randomized controlled trial of nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation after extubation of very low birth weight infants
    Barrington, KJ
    Finer, NN
    Bull, D
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 1999, 45 (04) : 184A - 184A