Diagnosis of Vespa affinis venom allergy: use of immunochemical methods and a passive basophil activation test

被引:2
|
作者
Gunasekara, Peshala [1 ]
Handunnetti, S. M. [1 ]
Premawansa, Sunil [2 ]
Kaluarachchi, Pradeep [3 ]
Karunatilake, Chandima [4 ]
Ratnayake, Indra P. [5 ]
Dias, R. K. S. [6 ]
Premakumara, G. A. S. [7 ]
Dasanayake, W. M. D. K. [4 ]
Seneviratne, Suranjith L. [8 ,9 ,10 ]
de Silva, Rajiva [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colombo, Inst Biochem Mol Biol & Biotechnol, Colombo 3, Sri Lanka
[2] Univ Colombo, Fac Sci, Dept Zool & Environm Sci, Colombo 3, Sri Lanka
[3] A Baur & Co Pvt Ltd, Healthcare Div, 62 Jethawana Rd, Colombo 14, Sri Lanka
[4] Med Res Inst, Dept Immunol, Colombo 8, Sri Lanka
[5] Dist Hosp, Bandarawela, Sri Lanka
[6] Univ Kelaniya, Fac Sci, Dept Zool & Environm Management, Dalugama, Sri Lanka
[7] Univ Colombo, Dept Basic Sci & Social Sci, Colombo, Sri Lanka
[8] Royal Free Hosp, Inst Immun & Transplantat, London, England
[9] UCL, London, England
[10] Univ Colombo, Fac Med, Dept Surg, Colombo 8, Sri Lanka
来源
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
CD63; IgE cross-reactivity; Insect venom allergy; Passive basophil activation test; Vespa affinis; REACTIVE CARBOHYDRATE DETERMINANTS; YELLOW JACKET VENOM; HYMENOPTERA-VENOM; WASP STINGS; DOUBLE POSITIVITY; CROSS-REACTIVITY; IGE; HORNET; SENSITIVITY; CD63;
D O I
10.1186/s13223-019-0394-6
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Allergy to Vespa affinis venom is common in the Asia Pacific region. Venom preparations for diagnosis are not commercially available for this species. Methods: The prominent allergens in V. affinis venom were identifiedusing immunochemical methods. Use of ImmunoCAP of Vespula vulgaris crude venom/its components and a passive basophil activation test (BAT) in the diagnosis of patients who had anaphylaxis to V. affinis venom (n = 30) were also accessed. The IgE double-positivity rates (positive to both hornet and honeybee) in ImmunoCAP and the passive BAT were determined. Results: High IgE reactivity was seen with the five allergens in V. affinis venom; 96% (29/30) for 34 and 24 kDa, 93% (28/30) for 45 kDa and 90% (27/30) reactivity for the 100 and 80 kDa respectively. IgE cross-reactivity was low with ImmunoCAP using V. vulgaris venom (43%; 13/30) and Ves v1 (3%; 1/30), but relatively high with Ves v5 (73%; 22/30). All patients (100%) were positive to V. affinis venom in passive BAT. In ImmunoCAP, a high double-positivity rate (76%; 23/30) was detected while no double-positivity was detected in passive BAT. Conclusions: High IgE reactivity for five allergens of V. affinis points to the potential of using these allergens in component resolved diagnosis (CRD). The passive BAT has shown its importance as a promising diagnostic tool with high accuracy. It would be particularly useful in cases with doubtful double-positive results of other diagnostic tests.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Use of a basophil activation test as a complementary diagnostic tool in the diagnosis of severe peanut allergy in adults
    Rentzos, Georgios
    Lundberg, Vanja
    Lundqvist, Christina
    Rodrigues, Rui
    van Odijk, Jenny
    Lundell, Anna-Carin
    Pullerits, Teet
    Telemo, Esbjorn
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL ALLERGY, 2015, 5
  • [42] BASOPHIL ACTIVATION TEST IN FOOD ALLERGY
    Moretto, Mauro
    Arbasi, Mariacristina
    Carbonetti, Enrica
    di Franco, Anna
    Guidotti, Samantha
    Peveri, Silvia
    Savi, Eleonora
    Rossi, Agostino
    CYTOMETRY PART B-CLINICAL CYTOMETRY, 2012, 82B (06) : 385 - 385
  • [43] The basophil activation test in wasp venom allergy: sensitivity, specificity and monitoring specific immunotherapy
    Erdmann, SM
    Sachs, B
    Kwiecien, R
    Moll-Slodowy, S
    Sauer, I
    Merk, HF
    ALLERGY, 2004, 59 (10) : 1102 - 1109
  • [44] Importance of basophil activation testing in insect venom allergy
    Mitja Kosnik
    Peter Korosec
    Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, 5 (1)
  • [45] The CD63 basophil activation test in Hymenoptera venom allergy:: a prospective study
    Sturm, GJ
    Böhm, E
    Trummer, M
    Weiglhofer, I
    Heinemann, A
    Aberer, W
    ALLERGY, 2004, 59 (10) : 1110 - 1117
  • [46] Basophil activation test in allergy diagnostics
    Nowakowska, Karolina
    Krolewicz, Emilia
    Gamian, Andrzej
    Barg, Wojciech
    POSTEPY HIGIENY I MEDYCYNY DOSWIADCZALNEJ, 2020, 74 : 548 - 555
  • [47] THE BASOPHIL ACTIVATION TEST IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ALLERGY: TECHNICAL ISSUES AND CRITICAL FACTORS
    Sturm, Gunter
    CYTOMETRY PART B-CLINICAL CYTOMETRY, 2010, 78B (06) : 408 - 408
  • [48] Is the basophil activation test (BAT) a reliable tool in the diagnosis of soy allergy?
    Teodorowicz, M.
    Breedveld, A. C.
    Jansen, A. P. H.
    Ruine-Mans-Koerts, J.
    Wichers, H. J.
    Savelkoul, H. F. J.
    ALLERGY, 2014, 69 : 47 - 48
  • [49] The basophil activation test in the diagnosis of allergy: technical issues and critical factors
    Sturm, G. J.
    Kranzelbinder, B.
    Sturm, E. M.
    Heinemann, A.
    Groselj-Strele, A.
    Aberer, W.
    ALLERGY, 2009, 64 (09) : 1319 - 1326
  • [50] Basophil activation test role in food allergy diagnosis: preliminary results
    Aruanno, A.
    Mezzacappa, S.
    Buonomo, A.
    Pecora, V
    Colagiovanni, A.
    Rizzi, A.
    Pascolini, L.
    Ricci, A.
    Di Rienzo, A.
    Liuzzo, M.
    Nucera, E.
    Schiavino, D.
    ALLERGY, 2012, 67 : 155 - 155