Efficacy of erector spinae plane block for analgesia in breast surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:92
|
作者
Leong, R. W. [1 ]
Tan, E. S. J. [1 ]
Wong, S. N. [2 ]
Tan, K. H. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Liu, C. W. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Gen Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Cent Lib, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Singapore Gen Hosp, Dept Pain Med, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Duke NUS Grad Med Sch, Dept Anaesthesiol, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
acute pain; breast surgery; erector spinae plane block; paravertebral block; pectoralis nerve block; post-surgical pain; regional anaesthesia; MODIFIED RADICAL-MASTECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; CHRONIC PAIN; ANESTHESIA; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/anae.15164
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The erector spinae plane block is a new regional anaesthesia technique that provides truncal anaesthesia for breast surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken to determine if the erector spinae plane block is effective at reducing pain scores and opioid consumption after breast surgery. This study also evaluated the outcomes of erector spinae plane blocks compared with other regional blocks. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched. We included randomised controlled trials reporting the use of the erector spinae plane block in adult breast surgery. Risk of bias was assessed with the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was used to assess trial quality. Thirteen randomised controlled trials (861 patients; 418 erector spinae plane block, 215 no blocks, 228 other blocks) were included. Erector spinae plane block reduced postoperative pain compared with no block: at 0-2 hours (mean difference (95% CI) -1.63 (-2.97 to -0.29), 6 studies, 329 patients, high-quality evidence, I-2 = 98%, p = 0.02); at 6 hours (mean difference (95% CI) -0.90 (-1.49 to -0.30), 5 studies, 250 patients, high-quality evidence, I-2 = 91%, p = 0.003); at 12 hours (mean difference (95% CI) -0.46 (-0.67 to -0.25), 5 studies, 250 patients, high-quality evidence, I-2 = 58%, p < 0.0001); and at 24 hours (mean difference (95% CI) -0.50 (-0.70 to -0.30), 6 studies, 329 patients, high-quality evidence, I-2 = 76%, p < 0.00001). Compared with no block, erector spinae plane block also showed significantly lower postoperative oral morphine equivalent requirements (mean difference (95% CI) -21.55mg (-32.57 to -10.52), 7 studies, 429 patients, high-quality evidence, I-2 = 99%, p = 0.0001). Separate analysis of studies comparing erector spinae plane block with pectoralis nerve block and paravertebral block showed that its analgesic efficacy was inferior to pectoralis nerve block and similar to paravertebral block. The incidence of pneumothorax was 2.6% in the paravertebral block group; there were no reports of complications of the other blocks. This review has shown that the erector spinae plane block is more effective at reducing postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores up to 24 hours compared with general anaesthesia alone. However, it was inferior to the pectoralis nerve block and its efficacy was similar to paravertebral block. Further evidence, preferably from properly blinded trials, is required to confirm these findings.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:404 / 413
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Erector spinae plane block for pain control after hip surgeries: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pan, Haiyan
    Fei, Guofang
    SCOTTISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023,
  • [42] Erector Spinae Plane Block Similar to Paravertebral Block for Perioperative Pain Control in Breast Surgery: A Meta-Analysis Study
    Weng, Wei-Teng
    Wang, Chi-Jane
    Li, Chung-Yi
    Wen, Huai-Wei
    Liu, Yen-Chin
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2021, 24 (03) : 203 - 213
  • [43] The safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in postoperative analgesic of PCNL: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Jiang
    Fang, Shirong
    Wang, Yuxi
    Wang, Lin
    Gao, Lunan
    Xin, Tingting
    Liu, Yuxiu
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (07):
  • [44] Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in patients after liver surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis on randomized comparative studies
    Bhushan, Sandeep
    Huang, Xin
    Su, Xiuyu
    Luo, Li
    Xiao, Zongwei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 103
  • [45] Erector Spinae Plane Block Decreases Pain and Opioid Consumption in Breast Surgery: Systematic Review
    ElHawary, Hassan
    Abdelhamid, Kenzy
    Meng, Fanyi
    Janis, Jeffrey E.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2019, 7 (11)
  • [46] Analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block in pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery: A systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Park, So Mee
    Kim, Hyo Sung
    Lim, Byung Gun
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2024, 98
  • [47] Analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae versus serratus anterior plane block in thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Muhammad Q.U.A.
    Sohail M.A.
    Azam N.M.
    Bashir H.H.
    Islam H.
    Ijaz R.
    Aquil S.
    Mansoor T.
    Dhakal B.
    Fatima T.
    Noor J.
    Khan A.S.
    Iqbal A.
    Khatri M.
    Kumar S.
    Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care, 4 (1):
  • [48] Efficacy and Safety of Erector Spinae Plane Block for Perioperative Pain Management in Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Fu, Meng-Yu
    Hao, Jie
    Ye, Lun-Hui
    Jiang, Wei
    Lv, Ying-Wen
    Shen, Jie-Liang
    Fu, Tao
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2023, 16 : 1453 - 1475
  • [49] Erector spinae plane block in breast surgery Response
    Swisher, Matthew W.
    Ilfeld, Brian M.
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2021, 46 (02) : 190 - +
  • [50] Effectiveness of erector spinae plane block for rib fracture analgesia: a systematic review protocol
    Harford, Philip
    Tran, Liem
    Pollock, Danielle
    Thiruvenkatarajan, Venkatesan
    Munn, Zachary
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2024, 22 (04) : 706 - 712