Measurement uncertainty evaluation by kurtosis method at calibration of electrical resistance standards using a comparator

被引:0
|
作者
Zakharov, I [1 ,2 ]
Botsiura, O. [2 ]
Semenikhin, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Sci Ctr, Inst Metrol, Myronosytska Str 42, UA-61002 Kharkiv, Ukraine
[2] Kharkiv Natl Univ Radio Elect, Nauky Ave 14, UA-61166 Kharkiv, Ukraine
来源
关键词
electrical resistance standard; resistance comparator; calibration; measurement uncertainty; uncertainty budget; kurtosis method; Monte-Carlo method;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
The article provides examples of the application of electrical resistance standards in metrological practice. Existing methods for their calibration are analyzed. It is established that calibration using a comparator is the most accurate and common method for calibrating electrical resistance standards. A model for transferring the size of the resistance unit in calibration of electrical resistance standards using a comparator is considered. An expression is given for the evaluation of the value of measurand. The procedure for estimating the expanded measurement uncertainty based on the kurtosis method is described, and the uncertainty budget is drawn up. An example of evaluation of the measurement uncertainty in calibration of the resistance coil P321 using a resistance comparator P3015 is given. The coincidence of the obtained results with those got using the Monte Carlo method is shown.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 16
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fabrication and Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation for Polystyrene Nanoparticle Standards
    Chen, Chao-Jung
    Lin, Chih-Min
    Yu, Ta-Chang
    Weng, Han-Fu
    Chen, Hui
    Liu, Yi-Yu
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS, 2010, 31 (06): : 511 - 516
  • [32] Platinum resistance thermometry: the conceptual difference between calibration uncertainty and measurement uncertainty
    Tischler, M.
    METROLOGIA, 2006, 43 (06) : L45 - L46
  • [33] On the uncertainty of network analysis methods for the calibration of electrical impedance standards at high frequency
    Callegaro, Luca
    Sellone, Marco
    Shoaib, Nosherwan
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (I2MTC), 2017, : 769 - 773
  • [34] THE EXPERIENCE OF APPLICATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY EVALUATION METHODS IN CALIBRATION
    Zhussupbekov, S. S.
    Ibrayeva, L. K.
    Khan, S. G.
    Komada, P.
    NEWS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN-SERIES OF GEOLOGY AND TECHNICAL SCIENCES, 2019, (04): : 79 - 85
  • [35] Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty for Calibration the Domestic Gas Meters
    Serediuk, O. Ye
    Vynnychuk, A. H.
    Klochko, N. B.
    2019 IEEE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED OPTOELECTRONICS AND LASERS (CAOL), 2019, : 679 - 682
  • [36] Calibration and evaluation of uncertainty in the measurement of environmental electromagnetic fields
    Borsero, M
    Crotti, G
    Anglesio, L
    d'Amore, G
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2001, 97 (04) : 363 - 368
  • [37] The Measurement Uncertainty in Determining of Electrical Resistance Value by Applying Direct-Comparison Method
    Plestina, Vladimir
    Boras, Vedran
    Turic, Hrvoje
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (06)
  • [38] Uncertainty in direct method of measurement and calibration of length gauges
    Dvorakova, Renata
    Svoboda, Emil
    Sbornik, 2001, (02): : 91 - 102
  • [39] Calibration of platinum resistance thermometers - Modelling the measurement for assessing the uncertainty
    Steep, Eckhard
    Henkel, Joerg
    Sommer, Klaus-Dieter
    TM-TECHNISCHES MESSEN, 2007, 74 (10) : 514 - 520
  • [40] Influence of connecting cables on the measurement uncertainty in calibration of resistance thermometers
    Bojkovski, J
    Bergelj, F
    Pusnik, I
    Drnovsek, J
    2000 CONFERENCE ON PRECISION ELECTROMAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS DIGEST, 2000, : 301 - 302