Development and validation of a prediction model for bothersome stress urinary incontinence after prolapse surgery: a retrospective cohort study

被引:9
|
作者
Oh, S. [1 ]
Lee, S. [2 ]
Hwang, W. Y. [3 ]
Suh, D. H. [3 ]
Jeon, M. J. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Ctr Precis Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Bundang Hosp, Seongnam, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Coll Med, 103 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
关键词
Prediction model; prolapse surgery; stress urinary incontinence; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; URETHRAL CLOSURE PRESSURE; WOMEN; SACROCOLPOPEXY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.17036
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To develop and validate a prediction model for bothersome stress urinary incontinence after prolapse surgery and to compare it with an existing clinical prediction model (CUPIDO model). Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Two tertiary hospitals in South Korea. Population A total of 1142 patients who underwent prolapse surgery with or without a concomitant midurethral sling. Methods To construct a prediction model, we performed logistic regression using both exhaustive and stepwise variable selection, validating the model both internally and externally. Main outcome measures Bothersome stress urinary incontinence defined as the presence of bothersome symptoms of stress urinary incontinence and/or subsequent continence procedure one year after surgery. Results Postoperative bothersome stress urinary incontinence occurred in 10% of patients. A model containing six predictors (age, diabetes mellitus, subjective urinary incontinence, prolapse reduction stress test result, type of prolapse surgery, and a concomitant midurethral sling) showed excellent performance for predicting bothersome stress urinary incontinence (area under the curve 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.62-0.86) and outperformed the CUPIDO model (area under the curve 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.49-0.76; DeLong's test P = 0.014). Conclusions This prediction model might be a useful tool to guide patient decision making regarding a concomitant continence procedure at the time of prolapse surgery. The predictive value of this model needs to be validated further in cohorts with different characteristics. Tweetable abstract The proposed prediction model for bothersome stress urinary incontinence after prolapse surgery outperforms an existing model.
引用
收藏
页码:1158 / 1164
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Recurrence of Stress Urinary Incontinence After Midurethral Sling Revision: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Shaw, Jonathan
    Wohlrab, Kyle
    Rardin, Charles
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 23 (03): : 184 - 187
  • [22] Effect of Concurrent Prolapse Surgery on Stress Urinary Incontinence Outcomes After TVTO
    Rapp, David E.
    Dolat, Mary Ellen
    Wiley, Joshua
    Rowe, Bruce
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 23 (04): : 244 - 249
  • [23] Development and external validation of clinical predictive model for stress urinary incontinence in Chinese women : a multicenter retrospective study
    Zhang, Dan
    Zhou, Min
    Zhang, Mingya
    Zhang, Youfang
    Wu, Donghui
    Weng, Ruijuan
    Tang, Min
    Munemo, Zvikomborero Panashe Rejoice
    Zhang, Hongxiu
    BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [24] Validation of a Model Predicting De Novo Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women Undergoing Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery
    Jelovsek, J. Eric
    van der Ploeg, J. Marinus
    Roovers, Jan-Paul
    Barber, Matthew D.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 133 (04): : 683 - 690
  • [25] Stress urinary incontinence before and after vaginal reconstructive surgery, retrospective observational study
    Svabik, K.
    Martan, A.
    Masata, J.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2007, 18 : S194 - S194
  • [26] Single-Incision Sling Versus Polyacrylamide Hydrogel During Transvaginal Prolapse Surgery for Occult Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Abdelaziz, Ahmed
    Walters, Mark
    Karram, Mickey
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY, 2024, 40 (03) : 169 - 175
  • [27] Re: Risk Factors for Urinary Retention after Urogynecologic Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Prediction Model
    不详
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (02): : 473 - 474
  • [28] Urinary incontinence after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse
    Lensen, Ellen J. M.
    Withagen, Mariella I. J.
    Kluivers, Kirsten B.
    Milani, Alfredo L.
    Vierhout, Mark E.
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2013, 32 (05) : 455 - 459
  • [29] Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence in Rural Fujian, China
    Wang, Qi
    Jiang, Xiao-Xiang
    Que, Yan-Zhen
    Wan, Xiao-Ying
    Lin, Chao-Qin
    RISK MANAGEMENT AND HEALTHCARE POLICY, 2024, 17 : 1101 - 1112
  • [30] Combined stress urinary incontinence surgery at the time of prolapse surgery - is it justified?
    Juul, L.
    van Rensburg, J. A.
    SAJOG-SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2009, 15 (03): : 86 - 88