Analysis of the Referral Rates of Newborn Hearing Screening Test According to Childbirth Delivery Methods in Neonatal Care Units

被引:2
|
作者
Seo, Ganghyeon [1 ]
Choi, Hyo Geun [2 ]
Jang, Sookyung [1 ]
Choi, Sun [1 ]
Lee, Sa Ra [3 ]
Park, Su-Kyoung [1 ]
机构
[1] Hallym Univ, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, 1 Singil Ro, Seoul 07441, South Korea
[2] Hallym Univ, Hallym Sacred Heart Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, 22 Gwanpyeong Ro 170beon Gil, Anyang 14068, South Korea
[3] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 88 Olymp Ro 43 Gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
关键词
newborn hearing screening; auditory brainstem response; otoacoustic emissions; cesarean section; referral rate; FAILURE; GUIDELINES; MODE;
D O I
10.3390/jcm10132923
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
It is known that neonates born by cesarean delivery (CD) may have higher referral rates than those born by vaginal delivery (VD) for newborn hearing screening (NHS). False-positive NHS results can increase costs and parental anxiety. This study analyzed the differences in NHS referral rates according to delivery methods in Level I, II, and III neonatal care units. A retrospective chart review was done for 2322 infants (4644 ears) with delivery records who underwent NHS between 2004 and 2017. The first NHS was performed immediately before discharge when the infant was in good condition via the automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) or automated otoacoustic emissions (AOAE). There were 98 neonates (196 ears) who underwent both AABR and AOAE simultaneously as the first NHS, 30 of which failed. We used a total of 4810 ears in this analysis. Of all enrolled ears, 2075 ears were of neonates born by CD, and 2735 ears were of neonates born by VD. A total of 2460 ears were from patients in Level III neonatal intensive care units (NICU) and 2350 ears were from Level I and II neonatal care units. The overall referral rate was higher in infants born via CD (4.5%) than VD (3.2%). In Level I and II neonatal intensive care units, the referral rate was significantly higher in those born via CD (3.0%) than via VD (1.4%). Further, based on the screening method, AABR (75.8%) was more frequently used than AOAE (24.2%), thereby revealing AABR's higher referral rate in CD (2.9%) than in VD (1.2%). The referral rate of infants who underwent the NHS within three days of birth was higher in the CD group (3.0%) than in the VD group (1.3%). There was no significant difference in the referral rate depending on the delivery method when infants were hospitalized for more than four days or hospitalized in the NICU. The referral rate according to the delivery methods was significantly higher when the NHS test was performed for healthy newborns in the Level I and II neonatal care units born by CD within 72 h using AABR. Therefore, we recommend that the hearing screening test for newborns delivered by cesarean section be performed after 72 h of age. The results of this study may reduce the false-positive NHS results, unnecessary further tests, and parental anxiety.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [31] The Impact of Post-Birth Timing on OAE Test Efficacy: An Observational Analysis of Neonatal Hearing Screening
    Kumar, Sanjay
    Natraj, Rashmi
    Dutta, Angshuman
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2024, 76 (04) : 3396 - 3404
  • [32] Analysis of Down syndrome newborn outcomes in three neonatal intensive care units in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    Alfaro, Hanna Gabriela da Cruz
    Gomes Jr, Saint Clair
    de Sa, Renato Augusto Moreira
    Araujo Jr, Edward
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2024, 70 (03):
  • [33] ROP screening and treatment in four district-level special newborn care units in India: a cross-sectional study of screening and treatment rates
    Sabherwal, Shalinder
    Gilbert, Clare
    Foster, Allen
    Kumar, Praveen
    BMJ PAEDIATRICS OPEN, 2021, 5 (01)
  • [34] What to scale first? A cross-sectional analysis of factors affecting cesarean delivery rates at first referral units in Bihar, India
    Pendleton, Anna Alaska
    Dutta, Rohini
    Shukla, Minal
    Jayaram, Anusha
    Gadgil, Anita
    Hembram, Sasmita
    Roy, Nobhojit
    Raykar, Nakul P. P.
    GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, 2023, 16 (01)
  • [35] Newborn hearing screening: Effectiveness, importance of high-risk factors, and characteristics of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit and well-baby nursery
    Korres, S
    Nikolopoulos, TP
    Komkotou, V
    Balatsouras, D
    Kandiloros, D
    Constantinou, D
    Ferekidis, E
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2005, 26 (06) : 1186 - 1190
  • [36] Assessing Loss to Follow-up After Newborn Hearing Screening in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Sociodemographic Factors That Affect Completion of Initial Audiological Evaluation
    Cheung, Anthony
    Chen, Tammy
    Rivero, Rachel
    Hartman-Joshi, Kristin
    Cohen, Michael B.
    Levi, Jessica R.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2022, 43 (02): : 577 - 581
  • [37] Comparison of newborn hearing screening results between well babies and neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit for more than 5 days: Analysis based on the national database in Korea for 9 years
    Chang, Jiwon
    Oh, Seung-Ha
    Park, Su-Kyoung
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (06):
  • [38] Analysis of the Storage Methods for Raw Human Milk from Mothers with Infants Admitted to a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, According to Brazilian Regulations
    Bonzanini Grazziotin, Maria Celestina
    Grazziotin, Ana Laura
    Vidal, Newton Medeiros
    de Souza Freire, Marcia Helena
    Vieira Cavalcante da Silva, Regina Paula Guimaraes
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN LACTATION, 2016, 32 (03) : 446 - 454
  • [39] Sepsis prediction during outbreaks at neonatal intensive care units through body surface screening for Gram-negative bacteria: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Harder T.
    Haller S.
    Eckmanns T.
    Seidel J.
    BMC Research Notes, 11 (1)
  • [40] HEARING-LOSS SCREENING IN THE NEONATAL INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT - AUDITORY BRAIN-STEM RESPONSE VERSUS CRIB-O-GRAM - A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
    PRAGER, DA
    STONE, DA
    ROSE, DN
    EAR AND HEARING, 1987, 8 (04): : 213 - 216