Analysis of the Referral Rates of Newborn Hearing Screening Test According to Childbirth Delivery Methods in Neonatal Care Units

被引:2
|
作者
Seo, Ganghyeon [1 ]
Choi, Hyo Geun [2 ]
Jang, Sookyung [1 ]
Choi, Sun [1 ]
Lee, Sa Ra [3 ]
Park, Su-Kyoung [1 ]
机构
[1] Hallym Univ, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, 1 Singil Ro, Seoul 07441, South Korea
[2] Hallym Univ, Hallym Sacred Heart Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, 22 Gwanpyeong Ro 170beon Gil, Anyang 14068, South Korea
[3] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 88 Olymp Ro 43 Gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
关键词
newborn hearing screening; auditory brainstem response; otoacoustic emissions; cesarean section; referral rate; FAILURE; GUIDELINES; MODE;
D O I
10.3390/jcm10132923
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
It is known that neonates born by cesarean delivery (CD) may have higher referral rates than those born by vaginal delivery (VD) for newborn hearing screening (NHS). False-positive NHS results can increase costs and parental anxiety. This study analyzed the differences in NHS referral rates according to delivery methods in Level I, II, and III neonatal care units. A retrospective chart review was done for 2322 infants (4644 ears) with delivery records who underwent NHS between 2004 and 2017. The first NHS was performed immediately before discharge when the infant was in good condition via the automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) or automated otoacoustic emissions (AOAE). There were 98 neonates (196 ears) who underwent both AABR and AOAE simultaneously as the first NHS, 30 of which failed. We used a total of 4810 ears in this analysis. Of all enrolled ears, 2075 ears were of neonates born by CD, and 2735 ears were of neonates born by VD. A total of 2460 ears were from patients in Level III neonatal intensive care units (NICU) and 2350 ears were from Level I and II neonatal care units. The overall referral rate was higher in infants born via CD (4.5%) than VD (3.2%). In Level I and II neonatal intensive care units, the referral rate was significantly higher in those born via CD (3.0%) than via VD (1.4%). Further, based on the screening method, AABR (75.8%) was more frequently used than AOAE (24.2%), thereby revealing AABR's higher referral rate in CD (2.9%) than in VD (1.2%). The referral rate of infants who underwent the NHS within three days of birth was higher in the CD group (3.0%) than in the VD group (1.3%). There was no significant difference in the referral rate depending on the delivery method when infants were hospitalized for more than four days or hospitalized in the NICU. The referral rate according to the delivery methods was significantly higher when the NHS test was performed for healthy newborns in the Level I and II neonatal care units born by CD within 72 h using AABR. Therefore, we recommend that the hearing screening test for newborns delivered by cesarean section be performed after 72 h of age. The results of this study may reduce the false-positive NHS results, unnecessary further tests, and parental anxiety.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Referral rates for newborn hearing screening based on the test time
    Chung, You Sun
    Oh, Seung-ha
    Park, Su-Kyoung
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 127
  • [2] Newborn hearing screening in a neonatal intensive care population
    Hadjidemetriou, A.
    Papadouri, T.
    Papamichael, E.
    Karaoli, C.
    Aspris, A.
    NEONATOLOGY, 2007, 92 (04) : 284 - 284
  • [3] Comparison of costs and referral rates of 3 universal newborn hearing screening protocols
    Vohr, BR
    Oh, W
    Stewart, EJ
    Bentkover, JD
    Gabbard, S
    Lemons, J
    Papile, LA
    Pye, R
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2001, 139 (02): : 238 - 244
  • [4] Determining the effect of newborn hearing screening legislation: An analysis of state hearing screening rates
    Green, Denise R.
    Gaffney, Marcus
    Devine, Owen
    Grosse, Scott D.
    PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2007, 122 (02) : 198 - 205
  • [5] Referral and Lost to System Rates of Two Newborn Hearing Screening Programs in Saudi Arabia
    Alanazi, Ahmad A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEONATAL SCREENING, 2020, 6 (03)
  • [6] Hearing screening in the newborn intensive care nursery: Comparison of methods
    Rhodes, MC
    Margolis, RH
    Hirsch, JE
    Napp, AP
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1999, 120 (06) : 799 - 808
  • [7] Changes in the Hearing Thresholds of Infants Who Failed the Newborn Hearing Screening Test and in Infants Treated in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
    Kang, Min-Young
    Jeong, Sung-Wook
    Kim, Lee-Suk
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2012, 5 : S32 - S36
  • [8] Prevalence and referral rates in neonatal hearing screening program using two step hearing screening protocol in Chennai - A prospective study
    Vignesh, S. S.
    Jaya, V.
    Sasireka, B. I.
    Sarathy, Kamala
    Vanthana, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2015, 79 (10) : 1745 - 1747
  • [9] Maintaining acceptably low referral rates in TEOAE-based newborn hearing screening programs
    Maxon, AB
    White, KR
    Culpepper, B
    Vohr, BR
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 1997, 30 (06) : 457 - 475
  • [10] Newborn hearing screening in the neonatal intensive care unit: a private hospital experience
    Kayiran, Sinan Mahir
    Genc, Erkhan
    Erdil, Aysen
    Gurakan, Berkan
    HEALTHMED, 2010, 4 (02): : 373 - 378