Blood Pressure in Patients With Migraine Treated With Monoclonal Anti-CGRP (Receptor) Antibodies A Prospective Follow-up Study

被引:43
|
作者
Lentsch, Simone de Vries [1 ]
van der Arend, Britt W. H. [1 ,2 ]
VandenBrink, Antoinette Maassen [2 ]
Terwindt, Gisela M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Dept Internal Med, Med Ctr, Div Vasc Med & Pharmacol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
GENE-RELATED PEPTIDE; HYPERTENSION; SAFETY; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1212/WNL.0000000000201008
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objectives Anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) (receptor) antibodies are approved as preventive treatment for migraine. Recent concerns have been raised after a retrospective analysis of postmarketing case reports of elevated blood pressure (BP) associated with erenumab. In this prospective follow-up study, we aimed to assess the safety regarding BP in a real-world setting. Methods All people with migraine who were treated with erenumab and fremanezumab at the Leiden Headache Center between January 2019 and January 2021 were included. BP measurements were collected from baseline (T0) until 12 months of follow-up, with a 3-month interval (T1-T4). Mixed linear models were fitted with time as a fixed effect and the patient as a random effect. Results Both systolic and diastolic BP were increased at all time points T1-T4 compared with T0 (p < 0.001). The maximum estimated increase in the mean systolic BP was 5.2 mm Hg (95% CI 3.1-7.5). The maximum estimated increase in the mean diastolic BP was 3.5 mm Hg (95% CI 2.0-4.9). In the erenumab group (n = 109), both systolic and diastolic BP were increased at all time points compared with T0 (all p < 0.001). For fremanezumab (n = 87), systolic but not diastolic BP was increased compared with T0 at T1 (p = 0.006) and T2 (p = 0.004). Four patients (3.7%) with normal BP at T0 required antihypertensive treatment after erenumab was started. Discussion The mean systolic and diastolic BP increased after anti-CGRP (receptor) antibodies were started. The majority of patients remained within the normal BP limits, but some patients required antihypertensive treatment. Physicians should be aware that people with migraine may be at risk of developing hypertension when treated with anti-CGRP (receptor) antibodies, and this should be added to (inter)national treatment guidelines. Classification of Evidence This study provides Class III evidence that anti-CGRP (receptor) antibodies increase BP when used to treat patients with migraine.
引用
收藏
页码:E1897 / E1904
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Synergism of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies and onabotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of migraine
    Hennessy, E.
    Salim, A.
    Biswas, S.
    Sonneborn, C.
    Hogue, O.
    Suneja, A.
    Mays, M.
    Ahmed, Z.
    Mata, I
    HEADACHE, 2023, 63 : 170 - 171
  • [22] Predictors of response to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies: a 24-week, multicenter, prospective study on 864 migraine patients
    Piero Barbanti
    Gabriella Egeo
    Cinzia Aurilia
    Claudia Altamura
    Florindo d’Onofrio
    Cinzia Finocchi
    Maria Albanese
    Marco Aguggia
    Renata Rao
    Maurizio Zucco
    Fabio Frediani
    Massimo Filippi
    Roberta Messina
    Sabina Cevoli
    Antonio Carnevale
    Giulia Fiorentini
    Stefano Messina
    Francesco Bono
    Paola Torelli
    Stefania Proietti
    Stefano Bonassi
    Fabrizio Vernieri
    The Journal of Headache and Pain, 2022, 23
  • [23] Persistence to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies and onabotulinumtoxinA among patients with migraine: a retrospective cohort study
    Larry Charleston
    Brian Talon
    Christine Sullivan
    Carlton Anderson
    Steven Kymes
    Stephane A. Regnier
    Seema Soni-Brahmbhatt
    Stephanie J. Nahas
    The Journal of Headache and Pain, 24
  • [24] Predictors of response to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies: a 24-week, multicenter, prospective study on 864 migraine patients
    Barbanti, Piero
    Egeo, Gabriella
    Aurilia, Cinzia
    Altamura, Claudia
    D'Onofrio, Florindo
    Finocchi, Cinzia
    Albanese, Maria
    Aguggia, Marco
    Rao, Renata
    Zucco, Maurizio
    Frediani, Fabio
    Filippi, Massimo
    Messina, Roberta
    Cevoli, Sabina
    Carnevale, Antonio
    Fiorentini, Giulia
    Messina, Stefano
    Bono, Francesco
    Torelli, Paola
    Proietti, Stefania
    Bonassi, Stefano
    Vernieri, Fabrizio
    JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2022, 23 (01):
  • [25] Persistence to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies and onabotulinumtoxinA among patients with migraine: a retrospective cohort study
    Charleston, Larry
    Talon, Brian
    Sullivan, Christine
    Anderson, Carlton
    Kymes, Steven
    Regnier, Stephane A. A.
    Soni-Brahmbhatt, Seema
    Nahas, Stephanie J. J.
    JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2023, 24 (01):
  • [26] Spotlight on Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Migraine: The Clinical Evidence to Date
    Pellesi, Lanfranco
    Guerzoni, Simona
    Pini, Luigi Alberto
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 6 (06): : 534 - 547
  • [27] Peripherally acting anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies alter cortical gray matter thickness in migraine patients: A prospective cohort study
    Szabo, Edina
    Ashina, Sait
    Melo-Carrillo, Agustin
    Bolo, Nicolas R.
    Borsook, David
    Burstein, Rami
    NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL, 2023, 40
  • [28] Work impact and cost-effectiveness of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in patients with migraine
    Lazaro, C.
    Caronna, E.
    Alpuente, A.
    De la Torre, A.
    Torres, M.
    Pozo-Roisch, P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2023, 30 : 487 - 488
  • [29] Personality traits and efficacy of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine prevention
    Lovati, Carlo
    Bernasconi, Gianna
    Capogrosso, Chiara
    Molteni, Laura
    Giorgetti, Federica
    Dell'Osso, Bernardo
    Pantoni, Leonardo
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 43 (09) : 5765 - 5767
  • [30] Personality traits and efficacy of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine prevention
    Carlo Lovati
    Gianna Bernasconi
    Chiara Capogrosso
    Laura Molteni
    Federica Giorgetti
    Bernardo Dell’Osso
    Leonardo Pantoni
    Neurological Sciences, 2022, 43 : 5765 - 5767