A framework for model-based assessment of resilience in water resource recovery facilities against power outage

被引:4
|
作者
Juan-Garcia, Pau [1 ,2 ]
Rieger, Leiv [3 ]
Darch, Geoff [4 ]
Schraa, Oliver [3 ]
Corominas, Lluis [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Atkins SNC Lavalin, 500 Pk Ave Hub, Bristol BS32 4RZ, Avon, England
[2] Univ Girona, Sci & Technol Pk, Catalan Inst Water Res ICRA, Emili Grahit 101, Girona 17003, Spain
[3] InCTRL Solut Inc, 7 Innovat Dr,Suite 107, Dundas, ON L9H 7H9, Canada
[4] Anglian Water Serv Ltd, Thorpe Wood House,Thorpe Wood, Peterborough PE3 6WT, Cambs, England
[5] Univ Girona, Placa St Domenec 3, Girona 17004, Spain
关键词
WRRF resilience; Modelling; Stressor; Dynamic airflow model; Quantitative assessment; Uncertainty; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; WASTE; PERFORMANCE; EFFICIENCY; REALISM;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2021.117459
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Current practice to enhance resilience in Water Resource Recovery Facilities (WRRFs) is to ensure redundancy or back-up for most critical equipment (e.g. pumps or blowers). Model-based assessment allows evaluation of different strategies for quantitatively and efficiently enhancing resilience and justifying the allocation of resources. The goal of this study is to provide guidance for the development of tailored deterministic models of fullscale WRRFs. A framework for model-based resilience assessment is proposed that provides guidance on data collection, model selection, model calibration and scenario analysis. The framework is embedded into the Good Modeling Practice (GMP) Unified Protocol, providing a new application for resilience assessment and an initial set of stressors for WRRFs. The usefulness of the framework is illustrated through a resilience assessment of the WRRF of Girona against power outage. Results show that, for the Girona facility, limited energy back-up can cause non-compliance of WRRF discharge limits in the case of a blower power shut-down of 6 h, and around 12 h when the blower shut-down is also combined with a shut-down of the recirculation pumps. The best option to enhance resilience would be increasing the power back-up by 218%, which allows the plant to run with recirculation pumps and blowers at minimum capacity. In such a case, resilience can be further enhanced by manipulating the air supply valves to optimise the air distribution, to balance oxygen needs in each reactor with the overall system pressure. We conclude that, with industry consensus on what is considered an acceptable level of resilience, a framework for resilience assessment would be a useful tool to enhance the resilience of our current water infrastructure. Further research is needed to establish if the permit structure should accommodate levels sof functionality to account for stress events.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Model-Based Prioritisation Exercise for the European Water Framework Directive
    Daginnus, Klaus
    Gottardo, Stefania
    Paya-Perez, Ana
    Whitehouse, Paul
    Wilkinson, Helen
    Zaldivar, Jose-Manuel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 8 (02): : 435 - 455
  • [22] Numerical solution of a multi-class model for batch settling in water resource recovery facilities
    Buerger, Raimund
    Diehl, Stefan
    Carmen Marti, M.
    Mulet, Pep
    Nopens, Ingmar
    Torfs, Elena
    Vanrolleghem, Peter A.
    APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2017, 49 : 415 - 436
  • [23] Framework for Designing Virtual Water and Power Supply Networks with Interdependent Characteristics for Resilience Assessment
    Miao, Huiquan
    Gao, Siyuan
    Wang, Ding
    BUILDINGS, 2022, 12 (10)
  • [24] Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of small water resource recovery facilities: Comparison of mechanical and lagoon systems
    Thompson, Matthew
    Moussavi, Sussan
    Li, Shaobin
    Barutha, Philip
    Dvorak, Bruce
    WATER RESEARCH, 2022, 215
  • [25] Vulnerability and Resilience Assessment of Power Systems: from Deterioration to Recovery via a Topological Model Based on Graph Theory
    Beyza, Jesus
    Bravo, Victor M.
    Garcia-Paricio, Eduardo
    Yusta, Jose M.
    Artal-Sevil, Jesus S.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE XXII 2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL AUTUMN MEETING ON POWER, ELECTRONICS AND COMPUTING (ROPEC 2020), VOL 4, 2020,
  • [26] Model-based System Safety Assessment of Aircraft Power Plant
    Li, Yan
    Gong, Qi
    Su, Duo
    3RD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AIRCRAFT AIRWORTHINESS (ISAA 2013), 2014, 80 : 85 - 92
  • [27] A hybrid approach based energy management for building resilience against power outage by shared parking station for EVs
    Sridharan, S.
    Sivakumar, S.
    Shanmugasundaram, N.
    Swapna, S.
    Prabhu, V. Vasan
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2023, 216
  • [28] A model-based framework for the analysis of team communication in nuclear power plants
    Chung, Yun Hyung
    Yoon, Wan Chul
    Min, Daihwan
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2009, 94 (06) : 1030 - 1040
  • [29] MBFHA: A Framework for Model-Based Functional Hazard Assessment for Aircraft Systems
    Lai, Kimberly
    Robert, Thomas
    Shindman, David
    Olechowski, Alison
    INCOSE International Symposium, 2023, 33 (01) : 431 - 447
  • [30] Integrated System Design and Safety Framework for Model-Based Safety Assessment
    Krishnan, Rahul
    Bhada, Shamsnaz Virani
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 79311 - 79334