Reduction in ventilatory response to CO2 with relaxation feedback during CO2 rebreathing for ventilator patients

被引:2
|
作者
Holliday, JE [1 ]
Lippmann, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Med Serv, St Louis, MO 63106 USA
关键词
CO2; rebreathing; EEG; neural respiratory drive; ventilator; weaning;
D O I
10.1378/chest.124.4.1500
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Previous studies have shown that relaxation biofeedback reduced the amount of time spent receiving ventilation for difficult-to-wean patients. Objective: The present study was begun to test the hypothesis that the underlying mechanism of biofeedback ventilator weaning was the reduction of neural respiratory drive (NRD). Design: Prospective. Setting: Pulmonary Medicine division in a Veterans Affairs hospital and the St. Louis Regional Medical Center. Subjects: Twenty-four patients who were receiving mechanical ventilation were randomly assigned to either the biofeedback group or the control group. Intervention: Respiratory relaxation feedback (RFB) was administered while a single variable, PaCO2, was inputted to the respiratory control system and the output was measured. While rebreathing 7% CO2/93% O-2, the biofeedback group received a CO2 trial session and a CO2 RFB session, and the control group received a CO2 trial session and a CO2 no-feedback (NFB) session. Measurements and results: There was a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in respiratory and EEG parameters for the RFB group at maximal end-tidal CO2 (mean [+/- SE]; 70 +/- 0.2 mm Hg) between the CO2 trial and the CO2 RFB session compared to the control group where there was no significant difference between the results of the CO2 trial and the CO2 NFB session. The mean values for the CO2 trial and CO2 RFB session for the biofeedback group were as follows: occlusion pressure 0.1 s from the onset of inspiration, 8.42 +/- 1.08 and 6.48 +/- 0.78 cm H2O (which reflects NRD), respectively; minute inspiratory ventilation, 15.84 +/- 0.81 and 13.91 +/- 0.72 L/min, respectively; mean inspiratory flow, 670 +/- 2.28 and 581 +/- 35 mL/s, respectively; respiration rate, 32 +/- 2.28 and 31.2 +/- 2.58 breaths/min, respectively; and chest background electromyography, 4.89 +/- 0.71 and 3.54 +/- 0.54 muV, respectively. The mean electroencephalograph outputs for the CO2 trial and CO2 RFB session for the biofeedback group were as follows: mean EEG frequency, 14.78 +/- 0.98 and 13.06 +/- 0.59 Hz, respectively; and beta EEG power, 3.1 +/- 0.03 and 2.39 +/- 0.19, muV(2), respectively; and gamma EEG power, 2.96 +/- 0.34 and 2.24 +/- 0.24 muV(2), respectively. Conclusion: We conclude that the decrease in respiratory parameters reflecting NRD induced by RFB represents a key mechanism for the previously demonstrated effectiveness of biofeedback in reducing weaning time from mechanical ventilation.
引用
收藏
页码:1500 / 1511
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] VENTILATORY RESPONSE TO PULSES OF INHALED CO2 DURING EXERCISE IN MAN
    JACOBI, MS
    PATIL, CP
    SAUNDERS, KB
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1987, 382 : P51 - P51
  • [42] Patients with Cystic Fibrosis Have Blunted and Delayed Response to CO2 Rebreathing
    Sherman, M. S.
    Hoag, J.
    Hadeh, A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 179
  • [43] VENTILATORY RESPONSE TO INCREASING ARTERIAL CO2 TENSION EMPLOYING A REBREATHING METHOD IN NORMAL INDIVIDUALS AND IN PATIENTS WITH CARDIAC DISEASE
    PAULI, HG
    NOE, FE
    COATES, EO
    JOURNAL OF LABORATORY AND CLINICAL MEDICINE, 1959, 54 (01): : 26 - 37
  • [44] QUANTIFICATION OF DIAPHRAGMATIC EMG RESPONSE TO CO2 REBREATHING IN HUMANS
    LOPATA, M
    EVANICH, MJ
    LOURENCO, RV
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1977, 43 (02) : 262 - 270
  • [45] MATURATION OF CO2 RESPONSIVITY IN NEONATAL RABBITS USING CO2 REBREATHING TECHNIQUE
    YEE, WFH
    SCARPELLI, EM
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1983, 31 (03): : A698 - A698
  • [46] Mechanical limitation during CO2 rebreathing in young patients with cystic fibrosis
    Fauroux, Brigitte
    Nicot, Frederic
    Boelle, Pierre-Yves
    Boule, Michele
    Clement, Annick
    Lofaso, Frederic
    Bonora, Monique
    RESPIRATORY PHYSIOLOGY & NEUROBIOLOGY, 2006, 153 (03) : 217 - 225
  • [47] VENTILATORY RESPONSE TO CO2 OF PATIENTS WITH DIFFUSE PULMONARY INFILTRATIONS OR FIBROSIS
    PATTON, JMS
    FREEDMAN, S
    CLINICAL SCIENCE, 1972, 43 (01) : 55 - &
  • [48] THE VENTILATORY RESPONSE TO CO2 WITHIN OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA PATIENTS
    Earing, C. M. N.
    Moore, J. P.
    McKeon, D. J.
    Kubis, H-P
    THORAX, 2013, 68 : A62 - A62
  • [49] VENTILATORY RESPONSE TO CO2 IN BIRDS .2. CONTRIBUTION BY INTRA-PULMONARY CO2 RECEPTORS
    SCHEID, P
    GRATZ, RK
    POWELL, FL
    FEDDE, MR
    RESPIRATION PHYSIOLOGY, 1978, 35 (03): : 361 - 372
  • [50] AUTOMATIC MONITORING OF BREATH-TO-BREATH OCCLUSION PRESSURE AND VENTILATORY PARAMETERS DURING CO2 REBREATHING
    DELAVAULT, E
    SAUMON, G
    GEORGES, R
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1984, 6 (01): : 3 - 8