Stochastic design optimization accounting for structural and distributional design variables

被引:5
|
作者
Ren, Xuchun [1 ]
Rahman, Sharif [2 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Southern Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Statesboro, GA 30460 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Augmented polynomial dimensional decomposition; Distributional design variables; Stochastic design optimization; Structural design variables; DIMENSION-REDUCTION METHOD; RELIABILITY-BASED OPTIMIZATION; ROBUST DESIGN; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; DECOMPOSITION;
D O I
10.1108/EC-10-2017-0409
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Purpose - This paper aims to present a new method, named as augmented polynomial dimensional decomposition (PDD) method, for robust design optimization (RDO) and reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) subject to mixed design variables comprising both distributional and structural design variables. Design/methodology/approach - The method involves a new augmented PDD of a high-dimensional stochastic response for statistical moments and reliability analyses; an integration of the augmented PDD, score functions, and finite-difference approximation for calculating the sensitivities of the first two moments and the failure probability with respect to distributional and structural design variables; and standard gradient-based optimization algorithms. Findings - New closed-form formulae are presented for the design sensitivities of moments that are simultaneously determined along with the moments. A finite-difference approximation integrated with the embedded Monte Carlo simulation of the augmented PDD is put forward for design sensitivities of the failure probability. Originality/value - In conjunction with the multi-point, single-step design process, the new method provides an efficient means to solve a general stochastic design problem entailing mixed design variables with a large design space. Numerical results, including a three-hole bracket design, indicate that the proposed methods provide accurate and computationally efficient sensitivity estimates and optimal solutions for RDO and RBDO problems.
引用
收藏
页码:2654 / 2695
页数:42
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Structural optimization with several discrete design variables per part by outer approximation
    Stolpe, Mathias
    Sandal, Kasper
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2018, 57 (05) : 2061 - 2073
  • [22] Design Optimization with imprecise Random Variables
    Herrmann, Jeffrey W.
    SAE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING, 2009, 2 (01) : 99 - 107
  • [23] Analysis and design of aerocapture tether with accounting for stochastic errors
    Tragesser, SG
    Longuski, JM
    JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 1998, 35 (05) : 683 - 689
  • [24] Analysis and design of aerocapture tether with accounting for stochastic errors
    Purdue Univ, West Lafayette, United States
    J Spacecr Rockets, 5 (683-689):
  • [25] STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION AND OPTIMIZATION OF DESIGN PROCESS
    ZIMMERMANN, R
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR FLUGWISSENSCHAFTEN UND WELTRAUMFORSCHUNG, 1978, 2 (05): : 321 - 329
  • [26] Structural Design Optimization for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks using Stochastic Computing
    Li, Zhe
    Ren, Ao
    Li, Ji
    Qiu, Qinru
    Yuan, Bo
    Draper, Jeffrey
    Wang, Yanzhi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 DESIGN, AUTOMATION & TEST IN EUROPE CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION (DATE), 2017, : 250 - 253
  • [27] Optimization of a wheel profile accounting for design robustness
    Markine, V. L.
    Shevtsov, I. Y.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART F-JOURNAL OF RAIL AND RAPID TRANSIT, 2011, 225 (F5) : 433 - 441
  • [28] INTEGRATED ANALYSIS AND DESIGN IN STOCHASTIC OPTIMIZATION
    MAGLARAS, GK
    NIKOLAIDIS, E
    STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION, 1990, 2 (03): : 163 - 172
  • [29] New Stochastic algorithm for design optimization
    de Sousa, FL
    Ramos, FM
    Paglione, P
    Girardi, RM
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2003, 41 (09) : 1808 - 1818
  • [30] Polyurethane design using stochastic optimization
    Eslick, John
    Camarda, Kyle
    16TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING AND 9TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PROCESS SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2006, 21 : 769 - 774