Top-down control of cyanobacteria: A theoretical analysis

被引:65
|
作者
Gragnani, A
Scheffer, M
Rinaldi, S
机构
[1] Agr Univ Wageningen, Dept Water Qual Management & Aquat Ecol, NL-6700 DD Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Politecn Milan, Dept Elect & Informat, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[3] Politecn Milan, Res Ctr Comp Sci Environm, I-20133 Milan, Italy
来源
AMERICAN NATURALIST | 1999年 / 153卷 / 01期
关键词
plankton dynamics; cyanobacteria; top-down control; chaos;
D O I
10.1086/303146
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Field patterns and experimental results suggest that the effect of zooplankton grazing on the abundance of large colonial cyanobacteria may differ strongly from case to case. In this article we present an extensive analysis of a model that describes the competition between cyanobacteria of the Oscillatoria group and green algae exploited by Daphnia. In particular, we study the response of the model to changes in the nutrient concentration and predation by zooplanktivorous fish. The analysis is repeated for an array of different assumptions on the nutritional value of cyanobacteria and selectivity of zooplankton grazing. When fish predation pressure is so high that Daphnia density is negligible, there is competitive exclusion between the two primary producers, and over a range of nutrient levels, there are two alternative attractors: one with only cyanobacteria and one with only green algae. When fish predation pressure is lower, zooplankton becomes important, and if grazing by these animals is sufficiently selective, this may cause a third attractor on which Daphnia, cyanobacteria, and algae coexist. This "mixed" attractor may be stationary, oscillatory, or chaotic. Depending on the nutrient level, the nutritional value of cyanobacteria, and the selectivity of zooplankton, cyanobacterial dominance may be either induced or eliminated in response to reduced fish predation. This is well in line with the confusing array of field studies and experimental results.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 72
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Tackling Top-Down Protein Analysis
    Schug, Kevin
    Matheson, Alasdair
    LC GC EUROPE, 2020, 33 (02) : 96 - 99
  • [22] A buffer control method for top-down project control
    Martens, Annelies
    Vanhoucke, Mario
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 262 (01) : 274 - 286
  • [23] Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy
    Awh, Edward
    Belopolsky, Artem V.
    Theeuwes, Jan
    TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (08) : 437 - 443
  • [24] Impulsivity, Compulsivity, and Top-Down Cognitive Control
    Dalley, Jeffrey W.
    Everitt, Barry J.
    Robbins, Trevor W.
    NEURON, 2011, 69 (04) : 680 - 694
  • [25] The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control
    J. B. Hopfinger
    M. H. Buonocore
    G. R. Mangun
    Nature Neuroscience, 2000, 3 : 284 - 291
  • [26] Minimal models of top-down control of phytoplankton
    Scheffer, M
    Rinaldi, S
    FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (02) : 265 - 283
  • [27] Top-Down Control of Gestalt Motion Perception
    Nobre, Alexandre de Pontes
    Nikolaev, Andrey R.
    Van Leeuwen, Cees
    Wagemans, Johan
    PERCEPTION, 2019, 48 : 159 - 160
  • [28] Verbal instructions and top-down saccade control
    Mosimann, UP
    Felblinger, J
    Colloby, SJ
    Müri, RM
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2004, 159 (02) : 263 - 267
  • [29] The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control
    Hopfinger, JB
    Buonocore, MH
    Mangun, GR
    NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 3 (03) : 284 - 291
  • [30] On the limits of top-down control of visual selection
    Jan Theeuwes
    Erik Van der Burg
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2011, 73 : 2092 - 2103