Cadazolid vs Vancomycin for the Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infection: Systematic Review with Meta-analysis open access plus

被引:4
|
作者
Muhammad, Aziz [1 ]
Simcha, Weissman [2 ]
Rawish, Fatima [3 ]
Sabih, Rajani [4 ]
Albert, Eid [5 ]
Ali, Nawras [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Dept Internal Med, Med Ctr, Kansas City, KS 66160 USA
[2] Touro Coll Osteopath Med, New York, NY USA
[3] Univ Toledo, Dept Internal Med, Med Ctr, 2801 W Bancroft St, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[4] Dow Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Surg, Karachi, Pakistan
[5] Univ Kansas, Div Infect Dis, Med Ctr, Kansas City, KS 66160 USA
[6] Univ Toledo, Dept Gastroenterol, 2801 W Bancroft St, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
来源
CURRENT CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY | 2020年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
Cadazolid; Clostridioides difficile; adverse events; diarrhea; recurrence; treatment; vancomycin; METRONIDAZOLE; FIDAXOMICIN; DIARRHEA;
D O I
10.2174/1574884714666190802124301
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend the use of vancomycin for the initial treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infection (CDI). Cadazolid, an experimental drug, has been utilized and compared in several studies with varying results. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using electronic databases [Medline, Google Scholar and Cochrane] for eligible studies. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comparing cadazolid with vancomycin for CDI treatment were included. Demographic variables and outcomes (CDI resolution, CDI recurrence, and adverse events) were collected. The primary outcome was clinical cure rate defined as the resolution of CDI at the end of a 10-day course. RESULTS: Two studies with three RCTs met the inclusion criteria with a total of 1283 patients with CDI who received either cadazolid 250 mg twice daily (624 patients) or vancomycin 125 mg four times daily (659 patients). Clinical cure rate at the end of the treatment was not statistically significant (pooled OR= 0.82; 95% CI = 0.61 to 1.11; p=0.20; I-2= 0%). Sustained clinical response at clinical follow-up was also not significantly different (pooled OR = 1.14; 95% CI = 0.91 to 1.43; p=0.27; I-2 = 0 %). Cadazolid had a lower recurrence rate than vancomycin (pooled OR = 0.71; 95% CI = 0.52 to 0.98; p=0.04; I-2 = 13 %). CONCLUSION: Cadazolid is non-inferior to vancomycin and offers a promising alternative for the treatment of CDI. More studies including RCTs and longitudinal studies with large and diverse patient population are needed to further confirm this. Furthermore, cadazolid should also be compared with fidaxomicin in a head-to-head trial to evaluate their efficacy for CDI.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:4 / 10
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SUROTOMYCIN (A NOVEL ANTIBIOTIC) VS VANCOMYCIN FOR CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE INFECTION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META ANALYSIS
    Aziz, Muhammad
    Chandrasekar, Viveksandeep Thogulva
    Desai, Madhav
    Fatima, Rawish
    Jackson, Mollie
    Sharma, Prateek
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 154 (06) : S421 - S421
  • [22] Oral vancomycin prophylaxis for the prevention of Clostridium difficile infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Babar, Sumbal
    El Kurdi, Bara
    El Iskandarani, Mahmoud
    Haddad, Ibrahim
    Imam, Zaid
    Alomari, Mohammad
    Myers, James
    Moorman, Jonathan
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 41 (11): : 1302 - 1309
  • [23] Efficacy and Safety of Monoclonal Antibodies Against Clostridioides difficile Toxins for Prevention of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Akiyama, Shintaro
    Yamada, Akihiro
    Komaki, Yuga
    Komaki, Fukiko
    Micic, Dejan
    Sakuraba, Atsushi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 55 (01) : 43 - 51
  • [24] Association Between Immunosuppressive Therapy and Outcome of Clostridioides difficile Infection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Li, Yiting
    Cai, Haifeng
    Sussman, Daniel A.
    Donet, Jean
    Dholaria, Kevin
    Yang, Jiajia
    Panara, Ami
    Croteau, Ryan
    Barkin, Jamie S.
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2022, 67 (08) : 3890 - 3903
  • [25] EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES AGAINST CLOSTRIDIOIDES DIFFICILE TOXINS FOR PREVENTION OF RECURRENT CLOSTRIDIOIDES DIFFICILE INFECTION; A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Akiyama, Shintaro
    Yamada, Akihiro
    Komaki, Yuga
    Komaki, Fukiko
    Micic, Dejan
    Sakuraba, Atsushi
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 158 (06) : S535 - S535
  • [26] Association Between Immunosuppressive Therapy and Outcome of Clostridioides difficile Infection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yiting Li
    Haifeng Cai
    Daniel A. Sussman
    Jean Donet
    Kevin Dholaria
    Jiajia Yang
    Ami Panara
    Ryan Croteau
    Jamie S. Barkin
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2022, 67 : 3890 - 3903
  • [27] Laboratory Diagnostic Methods for Clostridioides difficile Infection: the First Systematic Review and Meta-analysis in Korea
    Chung, Hae-Sun
    Park, Jeong Su
    Shin, Bo-Moon
    ANNALS OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2021, 41 (02) : 171 - +
  • [28] Faecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Baunwall, Simon Mark Dahl
    Lee, Mads Ming
    Eriksen, Marcel Kjaersgaard
    Mullish, Benjamin H.
    Marchesi, Julian R.
    Dahlerup, Jens Frederik
    Hvas, Christian Lodberg
    ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2020, 29-30
  • [29] Efficacy of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin in the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection: A systematic meta-analysis
    Zhao, Zihan
    Wu, Yarui
    Geng, Xuhua
    Yuan, Congrui
    Fu, Yi
    Yang, Guibin
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (32)
  • [30] Estimating Clostridioides difficile infection-associated readmission rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Eubank, Taryn A.
    Jantarathaneewat, Kittiya
    Jo, Jinhee
    Garey, Kevin W.
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024,