A Triple Bottom Line Dominant Logic for Business Sustainability: Framework and Empirical Findings

被引:49
|
作者
Svensson, Goran [1 ]
Hogevold, Nils [1 ]
Ferro, Carlos [2 ]
Varela, Juan Carlos Sosa [3 ]
Padin, Carmen [4 ]
Wagner, Beverly [5 ]
机构
[1] Kristiania Univ Coll, PB 1195, N-0107 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Vigo, Vigo, Spain
[3] Univ Turabo, Gurabo, PR USA
[4] Univ Vigo, Vigo, Spain
[5] Univ Strathclyde, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
business; corporate governance; economic; environmental; social; sustainability; triple bottom line approach; industrial marketing; business marketing; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY; PERFORMANCE; MODEL; ENVIRONMENTALISM; IMPLEMENTATION; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1080/1051712X.2016.1169119
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose: A limited number of studies have attempted to reveal the mechanism underlying integration amongst the economic, environmental, and social components of business sustainability (BS). BS refers to a company's efforts to go beyond focusing only on profitability, also to manage its environmental, social, and broader economic impact on the marketplace and society as a whole. The research objective of this study is therefore to develop and test a framework of BS, based upon the triple bottom line (TBL) approach. Methodology/approach: Companies with more than 100 employees were identified to take part in the study. Respondents included executives in charge of BS initiatives, such as chief sustainability officers, sustainable business managers, and CEOs. Ultimately, 261 companies agreed to participate. Questionnaires (and an accompanying letter with survey details and contact information on the researchers) were sent to the targeted key informant in the company. A total of 110 usable questionnaires were returned, generating a final response rate of 42.1%. Findings: To assess the underlying pattern of dimensions and items of the BS framework, factor analyses were conducted. An initial factor analysis revealed 3 separate subframeworks of BS (economic, social, and environmental dimensions of the TBL-approach), all of which demonstrate satisfactory factor solutions. A second factor analysis iteration, containing all subframeworks of BS (i.e., 20 dimensions and 60 items) generated a total explained variance of 80%, although the factor loadings of 3 dimensions and their items merged with 3 other dimensions. The final factor solution generated a satisfactory 17-factor solution and explained 83% of the variance, indicating satisfactory convergent, discriminant, and nomological validity, as well as reliability of each dimension. Research implications: The study proposes a BS framework and concludes that the measurement metrics of the BS framework, which were developed and tested, are valid and reliable. Suggestions for applications, research limitations, and further research are provided. The BS framework may be used by companies to assess and monitor their sustainable business practices in the marketplace and society. The framework provides managerial structure and guidance in terms of the dimensions to be taken into consideration and also the items for measuring each of the dimensions of the BS framework in the market and society. The study is not without its limitations and further work is needed to verify the validity and reliability of the empirical findings of the BS framework across contexts and over time. As it stands, the investigation provides a foundation for further research, offering opportunities for updates, amendments, and refinements. Originality/value/contribution: A principal contribution of this study is the empirically developed and tested BS framework. It is based on the elements of the TBL approach, consisting of dimensions and measurement items. The BS framework and its hierarchical layers provide a structured contribution that assesses and monitors the managerial implementation of sustainable business practices and sustainable business models. Furthermore, the structural properties of the BS framework, in relation to contextual variables, provide additional research opportunities for the future.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 188
页数:36
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Organizational logic to prioritize between the elements of triple bottom line
    Rodriguez, Rocio
    Svensson, Goran
    Eriksson, David
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2018, 25 (06) : 1626 - 1640
  • [32] THE EFFECT OF INNOVATION IN BUSINESS MODEL, SERVICES AND TECHNOLOGY ON FIRM SUSTAINABILITY: AN EXAMINATION USING TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE THEORY
    Faisal, Fatin Faseha
    Muhammad, Kamaruzzaman
    Ghani, Erlane K.
    ECONOMICS AND FINANCE LETTERS, 2022, 9 (02): : 170 - 179
  • [33] A triple bottom line decision framework for sustainable business location in the retail sector: a developing country perspective
    Asante-Darko, Disraeli
    Osei, Vivian
    Agbodjah, Sena
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL RESPONSIBILITY, 2024,
  • [34] Corporate conceptions of triple bottom line reporting: an empirical analysis into the signs and symbols driving this fashionable framework
    Sridhar, Kaushik
    SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL, 2012, 8 (03) : 312 - +
  • [35] Unveiling triple bottom line's influence on business performance
    Elisabete Nogueira
    Sofia Gomes
    João M. Lopes
    Discover Sustainability, 6 (1):
  • [36] The VanCity difference - A case for the triple bottom line approach to business
    Mowat, Dave
    2002, Elsevier (09)
  • [37] Sustainability in Supply Chain Management How to Execute the Triple Bottom Line
    Osland, Asbjorn
    Zhou, Shu
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 SUZHOU-SILICON VALLEY-BEIJING INTERNATIONAL INNOVATION CONFERENCE (SIIC): TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION AND DIASPORAS IN A GLOBAL ERA, 2013, : 13 - 18
  • [38] Corporate Governance and Sustainability Performance: Analysis of Triple Bottom Line Performance
    Nazim Hussain
    Ugo Rigoni
    René P. Orij
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2018, 149 : 411 - 432
  • [39] A SOCIAL EMPHASIS TO TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE REPORTING OF CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY EFFORTS
    Svensson, Goran
    Dos Santos, Maria A. O.
    Padin, Carmen
    THRIVING IN A NEW WORLD ECONOMY, 2016, : 288 - 288
  • [40] Managing knowledge in supply chains: a catalyst to triple bottom line sustainability
    He, Qile
    Gallear, David
    Ghobadian, Abby
    Ramanathan, Ramakrishnan
    PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2019, 30 (5-6) : 448 - 463