The Value of Laparoscopic Simultaneous Colorectal and Hepatic Resection for Synchronous Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis: A Propensity Score Matching Study

被引:4
|
作者
Zhou, Jiamin [1 ,2 ]
Feng, Longhai [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xinxiang [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Miao [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Yiming [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Ning [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Longrong [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Ti [1 ,2 ]
Mao, Anrong [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Ye [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Lu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Dept Hepat Surg, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Med Coll, Dept Oncol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Dept Colorectal Surg, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 12卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
colorectal cancer; synchronous liver metastasis; laparoscopy; simultaneous resection; prognosis; SIMULTANEOUS R0 RESECTION; PRIMARY TUMOR; HEPATECTOMY; MANAGEMENT; COLON;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2022.916455
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeThe aim of this study is to investigate the value of total laparoscopic simultaneous colorectal and hepatic resection in patients with synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases (sCRLMs). MethodssCRLM patients who underwent simultaneous resection from December 2014 to December 2018 in Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University were recruited and analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into laparoscopic, open, and hybrid surgery groups. The intraoperative information, postoperative short-term outcome, and long-term survival were compared among the three groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baselines. ResultsA total of 281 patients were recruited. After PSM, 34 patients were selected from both the laparoscopic and the open surgery group. Forty-seven patients were also selected from both the laparoscopic and the hybrid surgery group. The clinicopathologic baselines between the laparoscopic surgery group and the other two groups were well matched. All the operation-related indicators between laparoscopic surgery and hybrid surgery were similar. However, compared with open surgery, laparoscopic surgery showed significantly longer operation time (229.09 +/- 10.94 min vs. 192.24 +/- 9.49 min, p = 0.013) and less intraoperative blood loss [100.00 (50.00-300.00) ml vs. 200.00 (150.00-400.00) ml, p = 0.021]. For postoperative morbidity, there was no significant difference between the laparoscopic surgery group and the hybrid or the open surgery group (23.40% vs. 31.91% and 17.65% vs. 26.47%, p = 0.356 and p = 0.380). Long-term survival analysis showed that there were no significant differences in all 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival, liver recurrence-free survival (RFS), and whole RFS between laparoscopic surgery and hybrid surgery (p = 0.334, p = 0.286, and p = 0.558) or open surgery (p = 0.230, p = 0.348, and p = 0.450). ConclusionsLaparoscopic simultaneous resection for sCRLM shows slight advantages in surgical safety and short-term outcome, and does not compromise long-term survival.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical effect of laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer based on propensity score matching
    Liu, Yang
    Wang, Xian-Xue
    Li, Yu-Lin
    He, Wen-Tao
    Li, Hong
    Chen, Hua
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2024, 16 (01): : 124 - 133
  • [22] The Effect of Intraoperative Fentanyl Consumption on Prognosis of Colorectal Liver Metastasis treated by Simultaneous Resection: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Zhang, Yizhou
    Chen, Qichen
    Chen, Xiao
    Zhang, Mingzhu
    Li, Peng
    Huang, Zhen
    Zhao, Hong
    Wu, Hongliang
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2022, 13 (11): : 3189 - 3198
  • [23] Redo laparoscopic colorectal resection: a retrospective analysis with propensity score matching
    Jun Sakai
    Jun Watanabe
    Hiroki Ohya
    Shogo Takei
    Kenichiro Toritani
    Yusuke Suwa
    Kenta Iguchi
    Yosuke Atsumi
    Masakatsu Numata
    Tsutomu Sato
    Kazuhisa Takeda
    Chikara Kunisaki
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 38
  • [24] Redo laparoscopic colorectal resection: a retrospective analysis with propensity score matching
    Sakai, Jun
    Watanabe, Jun
    Ohya, Hiroki
    Takei, Shogo
    Toritani, Kenichiro
    Suwa, Yusuke
    Iguchi, Kenta
    Atsumi, Yosuke
    Numata, Masakatsu
    Sato, Tsutomu
    Takeda, Kazuhisa
    Kunisaki, Chikara
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2023, 38 (01)
  • [25] Prognostic impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastasis: A propensity score matching comparative study
    Ueno, Masaki
    Komeda, Koji
    Kosaka, Hisashi
    Nakai, Takuya
    Nomi, Takeo
    Iida, Hiroya
    Tanaka, Shogo
    Ikoma, Hisashi
    Matsuda, Kenji
    Hirokawa, Fumitoshi
    Matsumoto, Masataka
    Hokuto, Daisuke
    Mori, Haruki
    Morimura, Ryo
    Kaibori, Masaki
    Yamaue, Hiroki
    Kubo, Shoji
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 94
  • [26] Comparison of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases using propensity score matching
    Beppu, Toru
    Imai, Katsunori
    Sakamoto, Yasuo
    Miyamoto, Yuji
    Baba, Hideo
    ANNALS OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2016, 1
  • [27] ROBOTIC SIMULTANEOUS RESECTION OF COLORECTAL CANCER IWTH SYNCHRONOUS LIVER METASTASIS.
    Han, M.
    Han, Y.
    Cho, M.
    Hur, H.
    Min, B.
    Lee, K.
    Kim, N.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2018, 61 (05) : E272 - E272
  • [28] Laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer facilitates simultaneous surgery of synchronous liver metastases
    Hatwell, C.
    Bretagnol, F.
    Farges, O.
    Belghiti, J.
    Panis, Y.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2013, 15 (01) : E21 - E28
  • [29] Simultaneous hepatic resection benefits patients with synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases
    Li, Yuan
    Bi, Xinyu
    Zhao, Jianjun
    Huang, Zhen
    Zhou, Jianguo
    Li, Zhiyu
    Zhang, Yefan
    Zhao, Hong
    Cai, Jianqiang
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 28 (05) : 528 - 535
  • [30] Simultaneous hepatic resection benefits patients with synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases
    Yuan Li
    Xinyu Bi
    Jianjun Zhao
    Zhen Huang
    Jianguo Zhou
    Zhiyu Li
    Yefan Zhang
    Hong Zhao
    Jianqiang Cai
    Chinese Journal of Cancer Research, 2016, 28 (05) : 528 - 535