A review on learning effects in prospective technology assessment

被引:59
|
作者
Thomassen, Gwenny [1 ,2 ]
Van Passel, Steven [1 ]
Dewulf, Jo [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, Dept Engn Management, Prinsstr 13, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Res Grp Sustainable Syst Engn, Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
来源
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS | 2020年 / 130卷
关键词
Learning effects; Life cycle assessment; Techno-economic assessment; Prospective technology assessment; Learning-by-doing; Learning curve; Progress rate; Experience curve; COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS; EXPERIENCE CURVE; RENEWABLE ENERGY; POWER-GENERATION; SOLAR POWER; TECHNOECONOMIC EVALUATION; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; SCENARIO ANALYSIS; CARBON CAPTURE; BIOMASS POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2020.109937
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Global environmental problems have urged the need for developing sustainable technologies. However, new technologies that enter the market have often higher economic costs and potentially higher environmental impacts than conventional technologies. This can be explained by learning effects: a production process that is performed for the first time runs less smooth than a production process that has been in operation for years. To obtain a fair estimation of the potential of a new technology, learning effects need to be included. A review on the current literature on learning effects was conducted in order to provide guidelines on how to include learning effects in prospective technology assessment. Based on the results of this review, five recommendations have been formulated and an integration of learning effects in the structure of prospective technology assessment has been proposed. These five recommendations include the combined use of learning effects on the component level and on the end product level; the combined use of learning effects on the technical, economic and environmental level; the combined use of extrapolated values and expert estimates; the combined use of learning-by-doing and learning-by-searching effects and; a tier-based method, including quality criteria, to calculate the learning effect. These five complementary strategies could lead to a clearer perspective on the environmental impact and cost structure of the new technology and a fairer comparison base with conventional technologies, potentially resulting in a faster adoption and a shorter time-to-market for sustainable technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Simulation studies: a new method of prospective technology assessment and design
    C. Kumbruck
    M. J. Schneider
    Quality of Life Research, 1999, 8 : 161 - 170
  • [42] Simulation studies: a new method of prospective technology assessment and design
    Kumbruck, C
    Schneider, MJ
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1999, 8 (1-2) : 161 - 170
  • [43] Prospective mathematics teachers learning complex numbers using technology
    Gaona, Jorge
    Soledad Lopez, Silvia
    Montoya-Delgadillo, Elizabeth
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL EDUCATION IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 55 (09) : 2219 - 2248
  • [44] Machine Learning and Stress Assessment: A Review
    Faraz, Syed
    Ali, Syed Saad Azhar
    Adil, Syed Hasan
    2018 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING TRENDS IN ENGINEERING, SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY (ICEEST), 2018,
  • [45] Health Technology Assessment in nursing: a literature review
    Ramacciati, N.
    INTERNATIONAL NURSING REVIEW, 2013, 60 (01) : 23 - 30
  • [46] A review of technology assessment of green gasoline processing
    Naimah, Khoirun
    Mardanie, B. Rifai
    Dwi, L. Melinda
    Adi, S. Nugroho
    Sulistiyanto
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2020, 6 : 1641 - 1649
  • [47] Review of Terahertz Technology Readiness Assessment and Applications
    Albert Redo-Sanchez
    Norman Laman
    Brian Schulkin
    Thomas Tongue
    Journal of Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves, 2013, 34 : 500 - 518
  • [48] ETHICS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Bellemare, Christian A.
    Dagenais, Pierre
    K.-Bedard, Suzanne
    Beland, Jean-Pierre
    Bernier, Louise
    Daniel, Charles-Etienne
    Gagnon, Hubert
    Legault, Georges-Auguste
    Parent, Monelle
    Patenaude, Johane
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2018, 34 (05) : 447 - 457
  • [49] Ethics in health technology assessment. Review
    Garcia-Leon, F. J.
    JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE QUALITY RESEARCH, 2019, 34 (01) : 20 - 28
  • [50] A review of wind-resource-assessment technology
    Singh, S
    Bhatti, TS
    Kothari, DP
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY ENGINEERING, 2006, 132 (01) : 8 - 14