Economic benefits of treating high-risk hypertension with angiotensin II receptor antagonists (blockers)

被引:4
|
作者
Coca, Antonio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Hosp Clin, Dept Internal Med, Hypertens Unit,Inst Med & Dermatol, E-08036 Barcelona, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00044011-200828040-00002
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Hypertension is one of the leading risk factors for cardiovascular disease and represents a major health and economic burden. Most patients with high- or very high-risk hypertension have multiple cardiovascular risk factors with or without accompanying subclinical organ damage or established cardiovascular or renal disease. Patients with severe hypertension or with moderate hypertension and one to two additional risk factors have absolute 10-year risks of cardiovascular disease of 21-30% and 15-20%, respectively. Current European treatment guidelines recommend that antihypertensive therapy be initiated rapidly and aggressively in patients with high-risk hypertension. Most patients require two or more antihypertensive agents to achieve the strict blood pressure target of < 130/80 mmHg. This article reviews the existing cost-effectiveness data on the use of angiotensin II receptor antagonists (blockers) [ARBs] in patients with high-risk hypertension. Aggressive ARB treatment of patients in the early (microalbuminuric) stages of diabetic nephropathy has a significant renoprotective effect, delaying the onset of overt (proteinuric) nephropathy. By slowing the progression of these patients to end-stage renal disease, substantial cost savings can be made. There is a paucity of cost-effectiveness data regarding the use of fixed-dose ARB plus thiazide diuretic combination therapies. Longitudinal cost-benefit studies of this attractive and efficacious first-line treatment option are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 220
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Indications for and utilization of angiotensin receptor II blockers in patients at high cardiovascular risk
    Farsang, Csaba
    VASCULAR HEALTH AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2011, 7 : 605 - 622
  • [32] Transcend aftermath: Angiotensin ii type 1 receptor antagonists (angiotensin receptor blockers) at the clinical crossroad
    Volpe M.
    High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention, 2009, 16 (1) : 1 - 6
  • [33] Systematic review: Comparative effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers for treating essential hypertension
    Matchar, David B.
    McCrory, Douglas C.
    Orlando, Lori A.
    Patel, Manesh R.
    Patel, Uptal D.
    Patwardhan, Meenal B.
    Powers, Benjamin
    Samsa, Gregory P.
    Gray, Rebecca N.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 148 (01) : 16 - 29
  • [34] Vascular benefits of angiotensin receptor blockers
    Voors, Adriaan A.
    EXPERT OPINION ON INVESTIGATIONAL DRUGS, 2007, 16 (07) : 987 - 997
  • [35] Comparing Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers on Benefits Beyond Blood Pressure
    Siragy, Helmy M.
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2010, 27 (05) : 257 - 284
  • [36] Comparing angiotensin II receptor blockers on benefits beyond blood pressure
    Helmy M. Siragy
    Advances in Therapy, 2010, 27 : 257 - 284
  • [37] Angiotensin II receptor antagonists and treatment of hypertension and renal disease
    Perico, N
    Remuzzi, G
    CURRENT OPINION IN NEPHROLOGY AND HYPERTENSION, 1998, 7 (05): : 571 - 578
  • [38] Place of angiotensin II receptor antagonists in arterial hypertension therapy
    Boytsov, S. A.
    Kolos, I. P.
    RATIONAL PHARMACOTHERAPY IN CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 4 (04) : 69 - 75
  • [39] ECONOMIC IMPACT OF SWITCHING FROM VALSARTAN TO OTHER ANGIOTENSIN II RECEPTOR BLOCKERS (ARBS) IN PATIENTS WITH HYPERTENSION
    Signorovitch, J.
    Zhang, J.
    Wu, E. Q.
    Latremouille-Viau, D.
    Yu, A. P.
    Dastani, H.
    Kahler, K. H.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2010, 13 (03) : A161 - A161
  • [40] Angiotensin II receptor blockers
    Thai, H
    Raya, T
    CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 1999, 10 (06) : 377 - 381