NOTES in visceral surgery. Current status

被引:0
|
作者
Kaehler, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Univ Klinikum Mannheim, Zentrale Interdisziplinare Endoskopie, Med Fak Mannheim, Theodor Kutzer Ufer 1-3, D-68167 Mannheim, Germany
来源
CHIRURG | 2017年 / 88卷 / 08期
关键词
Natural orifice transendolumenal surgery; Transvaginal cholecystectomy; Interventional endoscopy; Transgastric surgery; NOTES registry; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s00104-017-0435-y
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The idea to use natural orifices as an access route for operations in the body has inspired many clinicians and researchers worldwide. Some of these expected a continuation of the development from open surgery to laparoscopic surgery finally to a less invasive modality. Others hoped for economic benefits for endoscopists to take over previous surgical patients into gastroenterological departments. The first experimental studies demonstrated that the initial expectations could not be implemented in a short period of time. The available endoscopes could not be proved for advanced procedures. Key problems like sterility, infection control, tissue manipulation, safety of access closure, and specimen retrieval manifested to be too large for routine clinical use. However, the attraction of the natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) philosophy has resulted in a reduction of the number and diameters of trocars in laparoscopic surgery. Hybrid NOTES as a combination of classical laparoscopic access with natural orifice instrumentations (mostly transvaginal) have become clinical reality in many hospitals. This development fits into the long-term trend towards less invasive surgery and more effective interventional methods in endolumenal endoscopy.
引用
收藏
页码:664 / 668
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Notes on war surgery.
    Forbes, AM
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1916, 1916 : 369 - 371
  • [2] Current status of macular surgery.: Indications and operative possibilities
    Richard, G
    Böhm, A
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGE, 1999, 96 (09): : 622 - 634
  • [3] Reconstructive pelvic surgery. Current status and future perspectives
    Nyarangi-Dix, J. N.
    Djakovic, N.
    Kurosch, M.
    Haferkamp, A.
    Hohenfellner, M.
    [J]. UROLOGE, 2009, 48 (05): : 510 - 515
  • [4] Robotic colorectal surgery. Current status and future developments
    Jayne, D.
    [J]. CHIRURG, 2013, 84 (08): : 635 - 642
  • [5] Thorascopic coronary surgery. Current status and future perspectives
    Jacobs, S
    Falk, V
    Onnasch, J
    Mohr, FW
    [J]. CHIRURG, 2003, 74 (04): : 310 - 314
  • [6] Preconditioning prior to visceral oncological surgery. A paradigm shift in visceral surgery?
    Pfirrmann, D.
    Simon, P.
    Mehdorn, M.
    Haensig, M.
    Stehr, S.
    Selig, L.
    Weimann, A.
    Knoedler, M.
    Lordick, F.
    Mehnert, A.
    Gockel, I.
    [J]. CHIRURG, 2018, 89 (11): : 896 - 902
  • [7] Notes on naval and military surgery.
    不详
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1915, 2 (07) : 449 - 449
  • [8] Focused ultrasound surgery. Basics, current status, and new trends
    Jenne, JW
    Divkovic, G
    Rastert, R
    Debus, J
    Huber, PE
    [J]. RADIOLOGE, 2003, 43 (10): : 805 - 812
  • [9] The status of orthopaedic surgery.
    Roth, PB
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1920, 1920 : 921 - 921
  • [10] The present status of spinal surgery.
    Lloyd, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1901, 36 : 1011 - +