Viewing Imaging Studies: How Patient Location and Imaging Site Affect Referring Physicians

被引:0
|
作者
Homayounieh, Fatemeh [1 ]
Singh, Ramandeep [1 ]
Chen, Tianqi [2 ]
Sugarman, Ellen J. [3 ]
Schultz, Thomas J. [3 ]
Digumarthy, Subba R. [1 ]
Dreyer, Keith J. [1 ]
Kalra, Mannudeep K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, 75 Blossom Court,Room 248, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Data Sci, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Partners HealthCare Syst, Dept Informat Syst, Boston, MA USA
关键词
CT; MR; Radiology reports; Referring physician; Patient location; Imaging use;
D O I
10.1007/s10278-019-00279-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to assess if clinical indications, patient location, and imaging sites predict the viewing pattern of referring physicians for CT and MR of the head, chest, and abdomen. Our study included 166,953 CT/MR images of head/chest/abdomen in 2016-2017 in the outpatient (OP, n = 83,981 CT/MR), inpatient (IP, n = 51,052), and emergency (ED, n = 31,920) settings. There were 125,329 CT/MR performed in the hospital setting and 41,624 in one of the nine off-campus locations. We extracted information regarding body region (head/chest/abdomen), patient location, and imaging site from the electronic medical records (EPIC). We recorded clinical indications and the number of times referring physicians viewed CT/MR (defined as the number of separate views of imaging in the EPIC). Data were analyzed with the Microsoft SQL and SPSS statistical software. About 33% of IP CT and MR studies are viewed > 6 times compared to 7% for OP and 19% of ED studies (p < 0.001). Conversely, most OP studies (55%) were viewed 1-2 times only, compared to 21% for IP and 38% for ED studies (p < 0.001). In-hospital exams are viewed (>= 6 views; 39% studies) more frequently than off-campus imaging (>= 6 views; 17% studies) (p < 0.001). For head CT/MR, certain clinical indications (i.e., stroke) had higher viewing rates compared to other clinical indications such as malignancy, headache, and dizziness. Conversely, for chest CT, dyspnea-hypoxia had much higher viewing rates (> 6 times) in IP (55%) and ED (46%) than in OP settings (22%). Patient location and imaging site regardless of clinical indications have a profound effect on viewing patterns of referring physicians. Understanding viewing patterns of the referring physicians can help guide interpretation priorities and finding communication for imaging exams based on patient location, imaging site, and clinical indications. The information can help in the efficient delivery of patient care.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 340
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Referring Physicians Assess the Quality of Outpatient Diagnostic Imaging Services: Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a Questionnaire
    Jossen, Marianne
    Valeri, Fabio
    Heilmaier, Christina
    Schwappach, David
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2019, 191 (08): : 725 - 731
  • [22] Analysis of queueing systems in collaborative imaging centers: A patient-referring mechanism
    Chen, Ping-Shun
    Huang, Chun-Ying
    Yang, Chun-Yi
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICS & MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, 2016, 19 (05): : 721 - 737
  • [23] How Advances in Imaging Will Affect Precision Radiation Oncology
    Jaffray, David A.
    Das, Shiva
    Jacobs, Paula M.
    Jeraj, Robert
    Lambin, Philippe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 101 (02): : 292 - 298
  • [24] Imaging - how to use it in clinical studies
    Ostergaard, Mikkel
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2006, 35 : 27 - 28
  • [25] Patient evaluation - Laboratory and imaging studies
    Begun, FP
    Foley, WD
    Peterson, A
    White, B
    UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1997, 24 (01) : 97 - +
  • [26] Noninvasive Imaging for the Asymptomatic Patient How to Use Imaging to Guide Treatment Goals?
    Logan, Juliette Kathleen
    Ayers, Michael Parker
    MEDICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2022, 106 (02) : 377 - +
  • [27] How gender and communication style of physicians affect patient satisfaction: The little difference
    Mast, MS
    Kindlimann, A
    Hornung, R
    SCHWEIZERISCHE RUNDSCHAU FUR MEDIZIN PRAXIS, 2004, 93 (29-30): : 1183 - 1188
  • [28] How does angular resolution affect diffusion imaging measures?
    Zhan, Liang
    Leow, Alex D.
    Jahanshad, Neda
    Chiang, Ming-Chang
    Barysheva, Marina
    Lee, Agatha D.
    Toga, Arthur W.
    McMahon, Katie L.
    de Zubicaray, Greig I.
    Wright, Margaret J.
    Thompson, Paul M.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2010, 49 (02) : 1357 - 1371
  • [29] Mass spectrometry imaging: How will it affect clinical research in the future?
    Dilillo, Marialaura
    Heijs, Bram
    McDonnell, Liam A.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PROTEOMICS, 2018, 15 (09) : 709 - 716
  • [30] Imaging of vulnerable plaques: Will it affect patient management and influence outcomes?
    Beller, George A.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 18 (04) : 531 - 533