Viewing Imaging Studies: How Patient Location and Imaging Site Affect Referring Physicians

被引:0
|
作者
Homayounieh, Fatemeh [1 ]
Singh, Ramandeep [1 ]
Chen, Tianqi [2 ]
Sugarman, Ellen J. [3 ]
Schultz, Thomas J. [3 ]
Digumarthy, Subba R. [1 ]
Dreyer, Keith J. [1 ]
Kalra, Mannudeep K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, 75 Blossom Court,Room 248, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Data Sci, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Partners HealthCare Syst, Dept Informat Syst, Boston, MA USA
关键词
CT; MR; Radiology reports; Referring physician; Patient location; Imaging use;
D O I
10.1007/s10278-019-00279-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to assess if clinical indications, patient location, and imaging sites predict the viewing pattern of referring physicians for CT and MR of the head, chest, and abdomen. Our study included 166,953 CT/MR images of head/chest/abdomen in 2016-2017 in the outpatient (OP, n = 83,981 CT/MR), inpatient (IP, n = 51,052), and emergency (ED, n = 31,920) settings. There were 125,329 CT/MR performed in the hospital setting and 41,624 in one of the nine off-campus locations. We extracted information regarding body region (head/chest/abdomen), patient location, and imaging site from the electronic medical records (EPIC). We recorded clinical indications and the number of times referring physicians viewed CT/MR (defined as the number of separate views of imaging in the EPIC). Data were analyzed with the Microsoft SQL and SPSS statistical software. About 33% of IP CT and MR studies are viewed > 6 times compared to 7% for OP and 19% of ED studies (p < 0.001). Conversely, most OP studies (55%) were viewed 1-2 times only, compared to 21% for IP and 38% for ED studies (p < 0.001). In-hospital exams are viewed (>= 6 views; 39% studies) more frequently than off-campus imaging (>= 6 views; 17% studies) (p < 0.001). For head CT/MR, certain clinical indications (i.e., stroke) had higher viewing rates compared to other clinical indications such as malignancy, headache, and dizziness. Conversely, for chest CT, dyspnea-hypoxia had much higher viewing rates (> 6 times) in IP (55%) and ED (46%) than in OP settings (22%). Patient location and imaging site regardless of clinical indications have a profound effect on viewing patterns of referring physicians. Understanding viewing patterns of the referring physicians can help guide interpretation priorities and finding communication for imaging exams based on patient location, imaging site, and clinical indications. The information can help in the efficient delivery of patient care.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 340
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Viewing Imaging Studies: How Patient Location and Imaging Site Affect Referring Physicians
    Fatemeh Homayounieh
    Ramandeep Singh
    Tianqi Chen
    Ellen J. Sugarman
    Thomas J. Schultz
    Subba R. Digumarthy
    Keith J. Dreyer
    Mannudeep K. Kalra
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2020, 33 : 334 - 340
  • [2] Auto-faxing imaging reports to referring physicians
    Robertson, P
    Day, D
    Leung, D
    Chien, E
    LimaSimao, F
    JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 1997, 10 (03) : 109 - 112
  • [3] Auto-Faxing imaging reports to referring physicians
    Pauline Robertson
    Dennis Day
    Desmond Leung
    Eugene Chien
    Fatima Lima-Simao
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 1997, 10 : 109 - 112
  • [4] Auto-faxing imaging reports to referring physicians
    Robertson, Pauline
    Day, Dennis
    Leung, Desmond
    Chien, Eugene
    Lima-Simao, Fatima
    1997, W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA, United States (10)
  • [5] Radiologists' Recommendations for Additional Imaging on Inpatient CT Studies: Do Referring Physicians Follow Them?
    Hanley, Owen
    Lotfi, Amir
    Sanborn, Tiara
    Friderici, Jennifer L.
    Fitzgerald, Janice
    Manikantan, Poornima
    Canty, Linda
    Stefan, Mihaela S.
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 110 (12) : 770 - 774
  • [6] Leasing imaging facilities to referring physicians: Fee shifting or fee splitting?
    Berlin, L
    Berlin, JW
    RADIOLOGY, 2005, 234 (01) : 44 - 48
  • [7] Imaging May Delay Transfer of Rural Trauma Victims: A Survey of Referring Physicians
    Lee, Cortney Y.
    Bernard, Andrew C.
    Fryman, Lisa
    Coughenour, Jeff
    Costich, Julia
    Boulanger, Bernard
    Chang, Phillip
    Kearney, Paul A.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2008, 65 (06): : 1359 - 1363
  • [8] Satisfaction of Imaging Report Rendered in Emergency Setting: A Survey of Radiology and Referring Physicians
    Manoonchai, Naree
    Kaewlai, Rathachai
    Wibulpolprasert, Arrug
    Boonpramarn, Ugrit
    Tohmee, Adul
    Phongkitkarun, Sith
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2015, 22 (06) : 760 - 770
  • [9] Computers in radiology - Review and interpretation of MR imaging studies with PACS: Creating uniform series descriptors for radiologists and referring physicians
    Schwartz, LH
    Kijewski, P
    Lynch, K
    Lis, E
    Panicek, DM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (03) : 575 - 577
  • [10] FREQUENCY AND COST OF DIAGNOSTIC-IMAGING IN OFFICE PRACTICE - A COMPARISON OF SELF-REFERRING AND RADIOLOGIST-REFERRING PHYSICIANS
    TEMPLE, PC
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 324 (19): : 1372 - 1372