A Randomized Controlled Trial of Skills Transfer: From Touch Surgery to Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

被引:12
|
作者
Chidambaram, Swathikan [1 ]
Erridge, Simon [1 ]
Leff, Daniel [1 ]
Purkayastha, Sanjay [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Dept Surg & Canc, London, England
关键词
Surgical training; Medical education; Simulation; Touch Surgery; VIRTUAL-REALITY SIMULATION; COGNITIVE TASK-ANALYSIS; TECHNICAL-SKILLS; PERFORMANCE; IMPROVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.042
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Surgical training has traditionally involved teaching trainees in the operating room. However, intraoperative training is time-intensive and exposes patients to greater risks. Touch Surgery (TS) is an application that uses animation to provide simulation training via cognitive task analysis as an adjunct to intraoperative training. Methods: Forty students were recruited and randomly allocated to either a control or intervention group. Each group received the same preparation before intervention, including a 10-min introduction to laparoscopic equipment and a 15-min educational tutorial on laparoscopic cholecystectomies. The participants then received training via either TS (intervention) or written information (control). Their performance was compared using a validated scoring tool on a porcine laparoscopic cholecystectomy model. Significance was defined as P < 0.050. Results: In total, n = 22 and n = 18 participants were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between age (P = 0.320), year of medical school (P = 0.322), handedness (P = 1.000), or gender (P = 0.360) of the groups. The overall mean performance score was higher for intervention (mean +/- SD = 41.9 +/- 22.5) than control (mean +/- SD = 24.7 +/- 19.6; P = 0.016). There was no significant difference between scores for each intraoperative segment between the intervention and control group (P > 0.050). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that TS is effective for providing cognitive training in laparoscopic cholecystectomies to medical students. It is likely that this effect will be seen across modules and other platforms that use cognitive task analysis alongside high-fidelity animation. Further work is necessary to extend this to other surgical procedures for evaluating its longitudinal effectiveness. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 223
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Laparoscopic and robotic skills are transferable in a simulation setting: a randomized controlled trial
    Thomaier, Lauren
    Orlando, Megan
    Abernethy, Melinda
    Paka, Chandhana
    Chen, Chi Chiung Grace
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (08): : 3279 - 3285
  • [42] Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Report of preliminary data
    Marks, Jeffrey
    Tacchino, Roberto
    Roberts, Kurt
    Onders, Raymond
    Denoto, George
    Paraskeva, Paraskevas
    Rivas, Homero
    Soper, Nathaniel
    Rosemurgy, Alexander
    Shah, Sajani
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 201 (03): : 369 - 373
  • [43] Interim report: A randomized controlled trial comparing postoperative pain in single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Chang, Stephen Kin Yong
    Wang, Yi Liang
    Shen, Liang
    Iyer, Shridhar Ganpathi
    Shaik, Ahmad Bin Syed Buhari
    Lomanto, Davide
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2013, 6 (01) : 14 - 20
  • [44] Randomized trial of needlescopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Cheah, WK
    Lenzi, JE
    So, JBY
    Kum, CK
    Goh, PMY
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (01) : 45 - 47
  • [45] Randomized trial of needlescopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Yorganci, K
    Kaynaroglu, ZV
    Oner, Z
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (07) : 1017 - 1017
  • [46] LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS MINILAPAROTOMY CHOLECYSTECTOMY - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL
    MCMAHON, AJ
    RUSSELL, IT
    BAXTER, JN
    ROSS, S
    ANDERSON, JR
    MORRAN, CG
    SUNDERLAND, G
    GALLOWAY, D
    RAMSAY, G
    ODWYER, PJ
    LANCET, 1994, 343 (8890): : 135 - 138
  • [47] Virtual Reality Training Versus Blended Learning of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy A Randomized Controlled Trial With Laparoscopic Novices
    Nickel, Felix
    Brzoska, Julia A.
    Gondan, Matthias
    Rangnick, Henriette M.
    Chu, Jackson
    Kenngott, Hannes G.
    Linke, Georg R.
    Kadmon, Martina
    Fischer, Lars
    Mueller-Stich, Beat P.
    MEDICINE, 2015, 94 (20)
  • [48] A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Training in Skills Transfer for Novices Performing a Simulated NOTES Task
    Nehme, Jean
    Sodergren, Mikael Hans
    Sugden, Colin
    Aggarwal, Rajesh
    Gillen, Sonja
    Feussner, Huburtus
    Yang, Guang-Zhong
    Darzi, Ara
    SURGICAL INNOVATION, 2013, 20 (06) : 631 - 638
  • [49] The nursing and financial implications of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: data from a randomized controlled trial
    Norwood, M. G. A.
    Stephens, J. H.
    Hewett, P. J.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2011, 13 (11) : 1303 - 1307
  • [50] Evaluation of a remote-controlled laparoscopic camera holder for basic laparoscopic skills acquisition: a randomized controlled trial
    Amin, Mohammad S. A.
    Aydin, Abdullatif
    Abbud, Nurhan
    Van Cleynenbreugel, Ben
    Veneziano, Domenico
    Somani, Bhaskar
    Goezen, Ali Serdar
    Palou Redorta, Juan
    Khan, M. Shamim
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Makanjuoala, Jonathan
    Ahmed, Kamran
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (08): : 4183 - 4191