Exploratory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections: Is Linezolid or Daptomycin Favored Over Vancomycin?

被引:3
|
作者
Vu, Michelle [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Smith, Kenneth J. [3 ]
Aspinall, Sherrie L. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Clancy, Cornelius J. [3 ,5 ]
Buehrle, Deanna J. [5 ]
机构
[1] VA Ctr Hlth Equ Res & Promot, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] VA Ctr Medicat Safety, Hines, IL USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Pharm, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] VA Pittsburgh Healthcare Syst, Pittsburgh, PA 15240 USA
[6] Optum Life Sci HOER, Eden Prairie, MN USA
关键词
MRSA BACTEREMIA; GREATER-THAN-1; MG/L; THERAPY; HEALTH; NEUTROPENIA; TROUGHS; LACTAM;
D O I
10.1007/s40261-021-01077-8
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background and Objective Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections (MRSAB) cause significant mortality, and often require extended antibiotic therapy. Vancomycin, the most common initial MRSAB treatment, carries significant monitoring burden and nephrotoxicity risks. Our objective was to compare the cost-effectiveness of vancomycin and other antibiotic regimens against MRSAB. Methods We estimated the cost-effectiveness of intravenous antibiotics (vancomycin, daptomycin, linezolid, ceftaroline/ daptomycin) for Veterans Health Administration patients with MRSAB using an exploratory decision-tree model. Primary effectiveness outcome was composite of microbiological failure at 7 days and adverse drug event (ADE)-related discontinuation after at least 7 days. Results In base-case analyses, intravenous linezolid was the least expensive regimen at 4 and 6 weeks. Daptomycin was more expensive and more effective than linezolid, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of similar to$13,000 (4 weeks) per composite failure avoided. With 6 weeks of treatment, daptomycin was more expensive and more effective than vancomycin (ICER similar to$21,000 per composite failure avoided). Vancomycin and ceftaroline/daptomycin were dominated strategies at both 4 and 6 weeks. In one-way sensitivity analyses, vancomycin was favored when its microbiological failure risk was less than 20.1% (base-case: 27.2%), assuming a willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of $40,000/composite treatment failure avoided. In two-way sensitivity analyses, intravenous linezolid was favored if linezolid microbiological failure and ADE-related discontinuation rates were < 22.5% and < 17.3%, respectively. Daptomycin, vancomycin, and linezolid were favored in 50%, 31%, and 17% of 4-week probabilistic iterations, respectively, at $40,000 WTP. Conclusion Daptomycin is likely less expensive and more effective than vancomycin or other initial regimens for MRSAB. More data are needed on the safety of linezolid against MRSAB.
引用
收藏
页码:885 / 894
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exploratory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections: Is Linezolid or Daptomycin Favored Over Vancomycin?
    Michelle Vu
    Kenneth J. Smith
    Sherrie L. Aspinall
    Cornelius J. Clancy
    Deanna J. Buehrle
    Clinical Drug Investigation, 2021, 41 : 885 - 894
  • [2] Cost-effectiveness analysis of linezolid compared with vancomycin for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
    Mullins, C. Daniel
    Kuznik, Andreas
    Shaya, Fadia T.
    Obeidat, Nour A.
    Levine, Andrew R.
    Liu, Larry Z.
    Wong, Winston
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2006, 28 (08) : 1184 - 1198
  • [3] Linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections
    Stevens, DL
    Herr, D
    Lampiris, H
    Hunt, JL
    Batts, DH
    Hafkin, B
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2002, 34 (11) : 1481 - 1490
  • [4] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF LINEZOLID VS. VANCOMYCIN AND TEICOPLANIN IN METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS INFECTIONS IN CZECH REPUBLIC
    Suchankova, E.
    Dolezal, T.
    Hajek, P.
    Kovar, P.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (07) : A422 - A422
  • [5] Cost-effectiveness of linezolid in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin and skin structure infections
    Bounthavong, Mark
    Hsu, Donald I.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2012, 12 (06) : 683 - 698
  • [6] Linezolid versus vancomycin for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections
    Johnson, JR
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2003, 36 (02) : 236 - 237
  • [7] Pharmacoeconomic analysis of the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with daptomycin or vancomycin
    Rubio-Terres, Carlos
    Rubio-Rodriguez, Dario
    Majos, Nuria
    Grau, Santiago
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE QUIMIOTERAPIA, 2012, 25 (04) : 283 - 292
  • [8] Linezolid vs vancomycin in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in children
    Bruss, JB
    Edge-Padbury, B
    Naberhuis-Stehouwer, S
    Kaplan, SL
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2003, 53 (04) : 322A - 322A
  • [9] Cost-Effectiveness of Daptomycin versus Vancomycin and Gentamicin for Patients with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and/or Endocarditis
    Bhavnani, S. M.
    Prakhya, A.
    Hammel, J. P.
    Ambrose, P. G.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2009, 49 (05) : 691 - 698
  • [10] Cost-Effectiveness of Linezolid vs Vancomycin in Suspected Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nosocomial Pneumonia in Germany
    De Cock, E.
    Krueger, W. A.
    Sorensen, S.
    Baker, T.
    Hardewig, J.
    Duttagupta, S.
    Mueller, E.
    Piecyk, A.
    Reisinger, E.
    Resch, A.
    INFECTION, 2009, 37 (02) : 123 - 132