Endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux associated with paraureteral diverticula in children

被引:32
|
作者
Cerwinka, Wolfgang H. [1 ]
Scherz, Hal C. [1 ]
Kirsch, Andrew J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Urol, Atlanta, GA 30342 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2007年 / 178卷 / 04期
关键词
vesico-ureteral reflux; diverticulum; injections;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.168
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Paraureteral or Hutch diverticula are congenital bladder diverticula that occur at or adjacent to the ureteral hiatus and are associated with vesicoureteral reflux in the majority of cases. Surgical treatment has traditionally been ureteral reimplantation with or without diverticulectomy. We present our experience with endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux associated with paraureteral diverticula. Materials and Methods: Of 745 patients undergoing endoscopic treatment for vesicoureteral reflux between 2002 and 2006, 17 (2.3%) had paraureteral diverticula located at the refluxing ureter. The hydrodistention implantation technique was used and dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer was used as bulking material. Success was defined as vesicoureteral reflux grade 0 on postoperative voiding cystourethrogram at I to 3 months after a single treatment. Results: A total of 20 refluxing ureters with associated paraureteral diverticula were treated in 17 patients. Of the cases 14 were unilateral and 3 were bilateral. Reflux was grade I in 6 patients, grade II in 4, grade III in 8, grade IV in 1 and grade V in 1. A mean of 1.2 ml bulking agent was injected per ureter. Overall success was 81% (13 of 16 patients) after a single injection. Success per vesicoureteral reflux grade was 100% (6 of 6 patients) for grade 1, 100% (3 of 3) for grade 11, 63%.(5 of 8) for grade 111, 100% (1 of 1) for grade IV and 100% (1 of 1) for grade V. Endoscopic treatment failed in 3 patients. Multivariate analysis identified large diverticular size and high bulking agent volume as predictors of treatment failure. Age, reflux grade and the presence of unilateral vs bilateral paraureteral diverticula did not impact outcome. Conclusions: Endoscopic injection of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer is an excellent choice for the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux associated with paraureteral diverticula because it has a high success rate and avoids open surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1469 / 1473
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux
    Lackgren, Goran
    Kirsch, Andrew J.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 105 (09) : 1332 - 1347
  • [22] ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT OF VESICOURETERAL REFLUX
    GELET, A
    SALAS, M
    MARTIN, X
    FAURE, JL
    DUBERNARD, JM
    JOURNAL D UROLOGIE, 1987, 93 (05) : 263 - 268
  • [23] Endoscopic Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux
    Arlen A.M.
    Kirsch A.J.
    Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports, 2017, 12 (3) : 217 - 224
  • [24] ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT OF VESICOURETERAL REFLUX
    SCHULMAN, CC
    SASSINE, AM
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 1992, 2 (01) : 32 - 34
  • [25] ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT OF VESICOURETERAL REFLUX
    SCHULMAN, CC
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1986, 135 (04): : A328 - A328
  • [26] Endoscopic Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux with Dextranomer/Hyaluronic Acid in Children
    Cerwinka, Wolfgang H.
    Scherz, Hal C.
    Kirsch, Andrew J.
    ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2008, 2008
  • [27] Outcome of endoscopic treatment for vesicoureteral reflux in children using polydimethylsiloxane
    Al-Hunayan, AA
    Kehinde, EO
    Elsalam, MA
    Al-Mukhtar, RS
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 168 (05): : 2181 - 2183
  • [28] Endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux in children
    Rahimi, Mohsen Mohammad
    Nazarbaghi, Surena
    Valizadeh, Rohollah
    Fakour, Sanam
    Haghmoradi, Meisam
    JOURNAL OF RENAL INJURY PREVENTION, 2018, 7 (02): : 89 - 93
  • [30] Endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children with posterior urethral valves
    Oktar, Tayfun
    Acar, Omer
    Sancaktutar, Ahmet
    Sanli, Oner
    Tefik, Tzevat
    Ziylan, Orhan
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2012, 44 (05) : 1305 - 1309